RayP
Tf
- Jan 12, 2011
- 94,103
- 17,878
NHL: Around the League 49
- Thread starter No Fun Shogun
- Start date
- Status
- Feb 1, 2009
- 2,695
- 3,942
Drumman44
Kyle Beach Deserved Better
- May 2, 2017
- 1,960
- 2,836
Good point. I imagine they are going to flip him at the deadline for a tidy sum. on the one hand, I wish the hawks had been in on that but we want to be as bad as possible.
Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 22,584
- 29,266
RayP
Tf
- Jan 12, 2011
- 94,103
- 17,878
What an oddly structured deal on the surface. I’m sure they had their reasoning but 3 of the first 4 years of that deal his yearly cash is 13 or 13.5M. Outlier being year 2 where he “only” took home 9M.
5 more years at a 9.85M hit…. Woof. Not very good last year, and only played 3 games year prior.
Yet did that list seriously stay SJ’s contract was worse?
RayP
Tf
- Jan 12, 2011
- 94,103
- 17,878
Darnell Nurse tied for 3rd highest paid player.
Imagine having McDavid on your team and his pay for the year is the same as Darnell freakin Nurse.
Imagine having McDavid on your team and his pay for the year is the same as Darnell freakin Nurse.
- Aug 24, 2011
- 28,781
- 13,797
The Nurse and Jones comparisons are always funny to me too. As if they’re the same low quality of player or something. Another GM caving into giving a middling talent a superstar contract. They’ll never learn.Darnell Nurse tied for 3rd highest paid player.
Imagine having McDavid on your team and his pay for the year is the same as Darnell freakin Nurse.
Big LOL at the Karlsson deal too. Saw that one coming from a mile away. These GM’s can’t help themselves
ChiHawks10
Registered User
I argued forever about Karlsson being an absolutely terrible contract the second it's signed for any team that did it. I argued with quite a few people here who wanted him signed here, also. It was a terrible idea. When a guy's biggest asset is his speed/skating, and his legs are absolutely destroyed by injuries, it didn't take rocket science to see that contract was going to be disgustingly bad for whoever paid him. Damn happy the Hawks didn't do it. Could you imagine having the Toews, Kane, Seabs, and Karlsson contracts all on the books at once?
clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 25,475
- 24,199
I still remember when @JaegerDice was all for giving Karlsson a big money deal despite his injuries. Whoops.
madgoat33
Registered User
- May 16, 2010
- 17,792
- 2,002
Are you familiar with his Corsi numbers? Fenwick!?!?
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,581
- 10,272
Big money but low term. I wouldnt have gone past 5 years.
My reasoning was simple. This team is going to be trash in 3 years (from his trade/ufa year) anyway due to aging curves for the core, we may as well blow our load now in a hail mary to win now. If it works, great, one more cup. If it doesnt, we were going to be shit for years post ‘dynasty run’ anyway.
8 years would have been too much for me though, cause then you’re interfering with the real-build post Kane/Toes/Keith etc. Irritatingly, they went ahead and made that mistake anyway with the Seth Jones deal.
A 5 year Karlsson deal would be ending next season, instead of just beginning.
Styles
No Light, No Signal
- Apr 6, 2017
- 8,389
- 13,597
Virtual venue of where the Coyotes will play next year. You can click around for different views of what it will look like from the stands.
coyotes.io-media.com
Arizona Coyotes Virtual Venue™ by IOMEDIA
3D Interactive Seat Views for the Arizona Coyotes interactive seat map using Virtual Venue™ by IOMEDIA
No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
I know it's a clownshoes thing, and both teams will stink, but I'm looking forward to probably paying out the wazzoo to watch a Hawks game down there this season.
- Dec 15, 2015
- 5,452
- 3,258
I am also hitting it when the Hawks are in town (as long as I am not away for work) since I live in AZ.
ChiHawks10
Registered User
Imagine still trying to defend the Hawks signing EK. He was trash from the second that contract was signed, and continues to be trash. So the Hawks would have had an additional tank commander right now, and nothing more.
BobbyJet
The accountability era?
With the exception of McD and perhaps Barkov, all of those contracts are overpayments... a few ridiculously so. It makes me just shake my head at the stupidity of some GMs.
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
Kaners Bald Spot
Registered User
As bad as the EK contract is, and as good as Jones is as a player.....I would rather have signed EK to that deal than traded what they did for Jones. Why? because neither player really matters to the Hawks.
I was in agreement that the EK contract would be terrible. The Jones trade set the Hawks back 2-3 years. Signing EK would have just accelerated the rebuild process.
BK
"Goalie Apologist"
Not a chance. I admit I wanted to sign EK to a 2-3 year deal (yeah yeah). I would much rather have Jones.
Everyone would rather have Jones. What he said is that he’d prefer EK, Boqvist, the #11, and the #6 to Jones and his contract. The Jones trade was an absolute disaster. I can’t think of a worse nhl trade by a floundering team.
RayP
Tf
- Jan 12, 2011
- 94,103
- 17,878
- Status
