I said I was more interested in a polished player at 5 than a guy who is playing like a globetrotter.
To which I was asked if I would take Demidov.
I then proceeded to suggest that Sennecke and Demidov's numbers have nothing in common, nor do their calibre as draft-eligible prospects.
To which I was then told the MHL was a shitty league.
So then again, what is the point you guys are trying to make exactly? That if I have reserves on Sennecke, that I should have reserves on Demidov?
Are you insane
One just posted a record year in the MHL and is widely seen as the #2 prospect, and the other is seen as a mid-round pick by most scouting services, who conveniently started producing after being put on Ritchie's line.
Are you seriously trying to establish a comparison as to how these two guys are even remotely freaking comparable?