Both goaltenders were solid early on. The team turned on Reimer after the DET game where he got no support, and they're turning on him again because of the last four games where he also got no support. If he'd gotten the support Bernier had, we might be talking about how he'd gotten us points in 5/6 games, and how he would take us to the Glory Land of the Playoffs.
Bernier's getting a pass for putting up ****tier numbers because the team gave him extra goal support and What Have You Done For Me Lately Nation only remembers the pre-Olympic run and not the kind of cool Nov/Dec/Jan, while Reimer is getting crucified and e-run out of town while putting up slightly less ****** numbers with less goal support.
And that pisses me off.
I agree and disagree. I agree Reimer is getting crucified. The team has been terrible defensively all year; however it is Bernier's rebound control and ability to deflect pucks out of play when we are in trouble that is the major difference. You cant judge on save %. Reimer has played what 20 something less games that is a big difference.
I think Reimer, is the type of goalie that needs to play a lot and get in a groove to play at the top of his game. Bernier deserves to be the #1. When he is in net the team plays better, and when they dont he saves our butts. While Reimer makes several butt saving saves but the team doesnt adjust their play.
Again Bernier hardly any rebounds, deflects pucks out. So the defense cheat, to get a step ahead in the O-zone BUT with Reimer you cant do that. Reimer has never been good with his rebounds, nor has he been good at controlling where they go. The solution is collapse...4 guys around the net to clear the puck 1 guy to chase the points...or 2 guys to chase the point 3 collapse. That hasnt happened. In fact I said before I think is an eye opener for Dave Nonis. Bernier being so good at controlling the play and rebounds that us being killed in shots, and winning games while playing terrible d fence...well its caught up to us. Who is to blame?? Well the players have to take accountability for sure. Randy is a defensive specialist HOWEVER..our defense on paper isnt as bad as they are playing either...so to me its the Coach and the players.
What is different with our blue line this year vs last?
Fraser go hurt was never the same so got traded. Liles out BUT Gleason is a piece we needed..fearless, tough and blocks shots. Gardiner well he is amazing (makes young mistakes but that is expected) and Reilly the same. Phaneuf has played a lot better this year as well...look at his stats..leads d in plus minus...is up there in d points as well. He logs a ton of minutes...only knock..he cant skate. But should we be this bad with our d zone coverage? and let 30 plus shots almost every game? From bad angle or not..the answer is no.
If we dont make it in. It will be because of what Randy feared from early on. Allowing turn overs for break aways or odd man rushes, bad zone coverage for easy goals...you cant expect to be a playoff team. Bernier merely masked that. To be honest his rebound control reminds me of Brodeur. Or if you want to go with around the same age..Carey Price.