IPS
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2017
- 16,710
- 27,647
No, definitely not. But that of course doesn't fit his narrative that he's trying to drive home. Marner was 100% not a dog on a bone, battling, and taking hits to get the puck. He was getting hit because his decision making slowed down due to his nerves. He handled the puck like a grenade out there. Hence the eye popping 5 over the glass penalties in his young playoff career. So giving a small shifty guy credit for getting hit due to brain farts...is an odd one. High end, undersized players, typically don't take punishment. They spin out, they're elusive, they're shifty. Guys like Patrick Kane. Or guys like....regular season Mitch Marner. Notsince67 also wants to give credit for the low percentage muffin shots Marner threw at the goal. None of which put any fan on the edge of their seat (outside of the 2 on 1 that Price robbed Marner on). Why did he throw low percentage shots on goal? See the grenade statement. When Marner is going, he's making plays you don't see, he's thinking one step ahead....he didn't do that in the playoffs. Hence getting hit more than usual, 2 over the glass penalties, and a plethora of Marner Muffins (he should patent that, see if Timmies will get that going for him) on the net. Marner is an exceptional talent. I wanted us to draft him, and I'm still happy we have him. But trying to spin anything into this being a redeemable series for him is absolutely laughable.
It also completely excludes the fact that the Habs clearly had no problems shifting their coverage and conceding Mitch getting open looks. Good move on their part too, cause Mitch couldn't put home a single goal. Who honestly thinks that the Habs felt threatened by Mitch getting open shots from the perimeter?
This is precisely the same reason he was underwhelming against Columbus.