JiricekSaveUs
Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
- May 2, 2018
- 19,326
- 12,289
So 5 of the next 6 games, all at home:
Penguins
Hurricanes
Jets
Leafs
and
Oilers
Not only losing these 5, but looking bad doing it, and I don't know what is going to happen.
Some interesting changes by the coach today, I guess this will be popular around here.
Boldy removed from the 1st PP unit, Gaudreau in. Rossi to the 4th line.
I mean what can we do other than just keep shuffling and hope something changes? We’re not going to trade to bring in guys if we’re already that far behind the 8-ball. I think maybe you write it off as a lost season and trade UFAs Gaudreau and Dumba.So 5 of the next 6 games, all at home:
Penguins
Hurricanes
Jets
Leafs
and
Oilers
Not only losing these 5, but looking bad doing it, and I don't know what is going to happen.
Boldy hasn't been given anyone to work with either, yet still has 11pts, only 5pts off Zucc's passenger points.Boldy hasn't produced much lately, so I can understand Evason. Boldy still has a lot to learn. He should join Zuccarello and Kaprizov on the ice after practice, let the experienced guys teach him.
Heat will certainly increase on Dean.So 5 of the next 6 games, all at home:
Penguins
Hurricanes
Jets
Leafs
and
Oilers
Not only losing these 5, but looking bad doing it, and I don't know what is going to happen.
I had mold growing in my knee and elbow pads when i played.One does not simply wash their equipment. You wash away all the talent.
Question from someone who never played and found hockey in his late 40s, so basically a casual fan. I’ve been following the Wild going back to Mike Yeo and Fletcher. Those guys are gone, significant players are gone, Fenton came and went, and it is still some of the same stuff happening like struggles with the power play etc. My question is this, how does Darby Hendrickson and Bob Woods keep their jobs through all of this change? Usually in other sports when a coaching change is made, they bring in different assistants? If Hendrickson was that good, after 12 years, wouldn’t he be a head coach somewhere? Could that be part of the problem? Not looking to get flamed for this, but am genuinely curious. The assistants must have a lot to say?
This is a great analogy. Do we put it in the positivity thread? lolThe turnover in coaching staff isn't that large when there is a new head coach. Like in the NFL a new head coach might bring in a new O, D, and special team coordinator; but the positional (RB, QB, LB, etc.) coaches will (mostly) stay the same. For the NHL the new head coach (offseason hire) might bring a bench coach with him, but it's not a whole entourage that follow them from place to place.
To put it in a (basic) business setting terms:
CEO = GM
Upper management = Head coach and Associate coach
Middle management = position coaches
9-5 workers = players.
When there is turnover at the top (GM/head coach) or bottom (players) the middle management pretty much stays the same.
Darby might just prefer the stability of staying where he is instead of moving every couple of years chasing the brass ring of head coaching jobs. MN keeps paying him (I'm guessing fairly) to do his thing. He (probably) likes his job. He (probably) likes where he lives. So there isn't a need for him to do anything except show up, punch his timecard, and do his job.
I don't think he's good at his job. But in fairness I only see a very small portion (6 mins of PP time a game) of what he actually does for his job. It's also on the players on the ice to execute. The PP has the same setup but has a completely different flow just by changing from Spurgeon to Addison on the point.
Boldy played with our best players on the PP, but he got demoted.Boldy hasn't been given anyone to work with either, yet still has 11pts, only 5pts off Zucc's passenger points.
Who does he play with 5v5?Boldy played with our best players on the PP, but he got demoted.
Anyway, I don't pay attention to stuff like this anymore, and I advise @Idlerlee to do the same. Zuccarello is on pace for 82 points, and he leads the team in assists. He's of great value to the team and contributes more than his salary would suggest. Off the ice as well, for example Evason said he had no idea what a great leader Zuccarello is. So he's just fine.
I do appreciate the analogy, but if that's passing for positive we're in a dark place.This is a great analogy. Do we put it in the positivity thread? lol
Hendrickson is a local guy, and more of a cheerleading, pick up and feed the pucks to players in practice type guy. He knows where all the bodies are buried in town, which can be useful to a new coaching staff coming in. As long as he isn't a character problem, you can always use a guy like that. To help run a practice, and bench, sometimes you just need guys, not hockey geniuses...no offense to Darby. If i had to guess, he is not doing a lot of X and O's, and will be more of a helping hand rather than a designer of the practices and skill work.Question from someone who never played and found hockey in his late 40s, so basically a casual fan. I’ve been following the Wild going back to Mike Yeo and Fletcher. Those guys are gone, significant players are gone, Fenton came and went, and it is still some of the same stuff happening like struggles with the power play etc. My question is this, how does Darby Hendrickson and Bob Woods keep their jobs through all of this change? Usually in other sports when a coaching change is made, they bring in different assistants? If Hendrickson was that good, after 12 years, wouldn’t he be a head coach somewhere? Could that be part of the problem? Not looking to get flamed for this, but am genuinely curious. The assistants must have a lot to say?
I still like him. Just not a fan of the implication that the franchise is beholden to him.Boldy played with our best players on the PP, but he got demoted.
Anyway, I don't pay attention to stuff like this anymore, and I advise @Idlerlee to do the same. Zuccarello is on pace for 82 points, and he leads the team in assists. He's of great value to the team and contributes more than his salary would suggest. Off the ice as well, for example Evason said he had no idea what a great leader Zuccarello is. So he's just fine.
I agreed with you on Zucc right now. But I don't think Deano playing him 21-22 minutes per game, help him or the team in any way.Who does he play with 5v5?
Boldy is a better overall player than Zucc... and Zucc is not playing well at all anymore. Zucc is showing his age right now.
Only 15 minutes at 5v5 and he doesn't kill penalties. Shouldn't be an issue.I agreed with you on Zucc right now. But I don't think Deano playing him 21-22 minutes per game, help him or the team in any way.
I agreed with you on Zucc right now. But I don't think Deano playing him 21-22 minutes per game, help him or the team in any way.