Proposal: Lindholm for Ceci and 1st round pick

internetdotcom

11 + 15 + 19 = 666
Jun 23, 2009
12,640
6
Capital O
lindholm? lol

Ah yes, here comes Legend123 to rag on the Sens once again in a thread that has less than nothing to do with any team he/she cheers for.

I really need to block you, but your posts are so out in left field that its good comic relief. :laugh:

Is this a joke?

Ottawa has nothing worth Lindholm

Really? I didn't realize that Karlsson and Stone had both retired.

Learn something new every day, I guess.
 

Sting

Registered User
Feb 8, 2004
8,096
3,323
Always love the good player + 1st round pick for superstar proposals...

Is Lindholm a superstar? Absolutely not. He's a star player that is pumped up around these boards. Great in his own zone, so-so in the offensive zone.

To be fair, the reason such an offer is made is because Anaheim can't take the cap on of a regular star player.

I don't think Ceci + 1st gets it done, and I don't think Ottawa is in a position to trade for him. They don't have the excess assets.

If I were Winnipeg, however, I'd be all over this.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,768
39,729
Is Lindholm a superstar? Absolutely not. He's a star player that is pumped up around these boards. Great in his own zone, so-so in the offensive zone.

To be fair, the reason such an offer is made is because Anaheim can't take the cap on of a regular star player.

I don't think Ceci + 1st gets it done, and I don't think Ottawa is in a position to trade for him. They don't have the excess assets.

If I were Winnipeg, however, I'd be all over this.

The problem is he isn't for sale
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,476
9,875
:huh:

Lets trade a potential franchise defensemen who is already a #1 for a top ten pick that might work out.

Saying it a bazillion times doesn't make it true.

Lindholm is good, but his ceiling is below the 'franchise' level for sure.


Sens and Ducks aren't good trading partners at this time. Neither can really take on any salary....so what's the point?
 

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,774
9,990
Vancouver, WA
Can't believe people don't see the problem with this trade. Ottawa is getting a massive upgrade in D, only for a 1st round pick that will most likely top out around the 5-15th pick. Adding Lindholm to Sens pretty much means they are not going to win the lottery.

And the Ducks downgrade in D, while we're trying to go all in. Then we end up having to pay Ceci when his contract is up and we end up back were we started, with just a worse player than Lindholm. What do we get in return? A player that may never pan out or will take a year or two to be able to play in the NHL.

Once again, people overrate a 1st round pick, thinking it'll be the next McDavid.
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
Saying it a bazillion times doesn't make it true.

Lindholm is good, but his ceiling is below the 'franchise' level for sure.


Sens and Ducks aren't good trading partners at this time. Neither can really take on any salary....so what's the point?

I don't think his ceiling is below franchise level "for sure."

Realistically? Maybe. Debatable, but for the sake of argument let's go with that. But to say it is below franchise level for sure suggests it's impossible for him to be that.
 

thedoughboy

Registered User
Feb 22, 2015
1,594
5
Tinyest of the fifty
As far as I care Anaheim can keep letting linholm play in sweden it's no skin off my back.

They are going to have to pull a bickell+teravainen, Datsyuk+12th overall(or w/e pick), Bolland+crouse type deal to even get SOME room, and even that probably won't be enough for them to get room for Lindholm.

IMO the ducks are in a worse position than those 3 teams, and haven't made a trade because other teams know it and are asking to take the cap hits for an absolute premium.
 

Vipers31

Advanced Stagnostic
Aug 29, 2008
20,393
2,206
Cologne, Germany
Lindholm is good, but his ceiling is below the 'franchise' level for sure.

Why? Would you call guys like Keith or Weber franchise defenders? When they were Lindholm's age, they certainly weren't on a different level "for sure". When talking about ceiling, there's pretty much no argument for him not having franchise level upside.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,280
10,205
Saying it a bazillion times doesn't make it true.

Lindholm is good, but his ceiling is below the 'franchise' level for sure.


Sens and Ducks aren't good trading partners at this time. Neither can really take on any salary....so what's the point?

with the way he dictates play, you would be very wrong
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,734
10,622
Montreal, Canada
This thread is delicious! HF at its best

First, I have learned today that the Sens are supposed to be a lottery team. They finished with 99 pts 2 years ago while being one of the youngest teams and the least experienced. And last year, despite everything going badly and KEY injuries, they ended up with the 12th OA pick. With the improvements and the hiring of a professional coaching staff, if things go bad this year they might end up with the 15th OA pick at worst

Even with Anaheim's situation, it's going to take a LOT to pry him away

Well, Ceci + a 1st is A LOT to begin with. Not saying that's the package Anaheim would like or that it would be enough, but the value isn't as far as some people are making it seem to be.

Watch Ceci against the Habs last night. Very solid both ways, I believe he will be seen as a strong #2 later this season. And his shot when he hit the post :amazed: a real bullet

Is this a joke?

Ottawa has nothing worth Lindholm

Yeah right...

On a serious note, Chabot, Brown, White, Perron, Chlapik, Dahlen, Englund already are or are establishing themselves as top prospects

Pair that with one of the many quality players on Ottawa's team, and you have many possible packages

But a trade isn't likely between those teams. Ottawa doesn't really need Lindholm as he would be a luxury, and with MacArthur and Lazar being out, the Sens can't afford to trade offense and that's what the Ducks need, they don't need defense.

Its one way or the other folks either the team is terrible and all its players are. Cant have it both ways hf.

The team 2-0 is a total fluke and have you seen Ceci play last night? What an absolute train wreck :sarcasm:

except Karlsson, but like most teams they could package some pieces like Stone + Ceci. That would work for Ana, i guess.

Stone PLUS Ceci? :laugh:

not even close, still.

Ceci is significantly below lindholm, and a 10ish OA pick doesnt come close to bridging the gap.

Stone + 1st would get the ducks attention

Offensively, they produce about the same and defensively, Ceci is progressing fast. This thread might look silly by the end of the year. The gap will get closer and some of the comments here will be useless

Stone + 1st would get the ducks "attention"??? :laugh:

Lol they wouldn't take Trouba and our 1st, nevermind Ceci. While Ottawa's 1st could be alot higher Ceci may not have the hockey IQ to keep up with alot of the Ducks good players.

What is this? lol HF

How does Ceci keep up then with players like Stone, Brassard, Ryan, Turris, Hoffman, Karlsson, etc?

The Ducks would do this if the Sens add Hoffman.

Ceci + 15th OA + Hoffman? :laugh:

Last year he had an unlucky on-ice sh% and a low PDO (unlucky). Accoridng to stats.hockeyanalysis he only had 9 even strength points. You can't judge him off of that one unlucky year.

Well, not a good season for a #1... Ceci had 19 ESP last season, tied with Gostisbehere

Ah yes, here comes Legend123 to rag on the Sens once again in a thread that has less than nothing to do with any team he/she cheers for.

I really need to block you, but your posts are so out in left field that its good comic relief. :laugh:.

Don't... It's posters like this that makes HF such an incredible place. Free dopamine!

Can't believe people don't see the problem with this trade. Ottawa is getting a massive upgrade in D, only for a 1st round pick that will most likely top out around the 5-15th pick. Adding Lindholm to Sens pretty much means they are not going to win the lottery.

I dunno.

Lindholm-Karlsson
Methot-Phaneuf
Chabot/Borowiecki-Wideman

That defense plus an already VERY GOOD forward group would make the Sens as a contender and far from a 5-15th pick IMO

Sens seem to finally have a competent coaching staff.
 
Last edited:

ohcomeonref

#FireCronin
Sponsor
Oct 18, 2014
7,005
8,204
Alberta, Canada
As far as I care Anaheim can keep letting linholm play in sweden it's no skin off my back.

They are going to have to pull a bickell+teravainen, Datsyuk+12th overall(or w/e pick), Bolland+crouse type deal to even get SOME room, and even that probably won't be enough for them to get room for Lindholm.

IMO the ducks are in a worse position than those 3 teams, and haven't made a trade because other teams know it and are asking to take the cap hits for an absolute premium.

The Ducks at any time they choose have a couple players they can send down as well as a couple they will probably be putting on LTIR. Pretending the Ducks are in some immovable, desperate situation doesn't make it so.
 

harrisb

Registered User
Oct 6, 2009
2,217
952
I would offer Nylander + 2018 1st from the Leafs for Lindholm. Any takers?

That would get it done considering the pick is likely top 3-5 at worst. Remove Nylander and that offence is getting thin beyond jvr, Matthews and Marner.
 

LeafsNation149

Registered User
Feb 4, 2013
7,386
1,264
That would get it done considering the pick is likely top 3-5 at worst. Remove Nylander and that offence is getting thin beyond jvr, Matthews and Marner.

Leafs 1st in 2018 will be a mid 1st round.

JVR, Matthews, and Marner are just the 1st line players, Leafs have many other prospects as well as Kadri.

Adding a 1st pairing dman to play with Rielly is Leafs biggest need right now
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad