VijayPatel11
Registered User
A 1C for 10 goal Patrik Laine??An established 1C under 25 years old. Do you need more clarity?
A 1C for 10 goal Patrik Laine??An established 1C under 25 years old. Do you need more clarity?
That's not exactly accurate. I said established 1 C wh is under 25. If you don't like that, don't make an offer, because that's what it will take.A 1C for 10 goal Patrik Laine??
In what world is current Patrik Laine worth a young 1CThat's not exactly accurate. I said established 1 C wh is under 25. If you don't like that, don't make an offer, because that's what it will take.
Dude. I could find my game playing with those two. That’s the NHLs 2nd best player and maybe it’s 12th best player.I think Laine could find his game again if he played with either MacKinnon or Rantanen.
It doesn't matter what you think. That's the cost. You look like a Florida fan. Make a proposal that include Barkov. As an example:In what world is current Patrik Laine worth a young 1C
The point of trading for Laine would be to improve our team, not to massively downgradeIt doesn't matter what you think. That's the cost. You look like a Florida fan. Make a proposal that include Barkov. As an example:
To Columbus
Barkov
To Florida
Laine
Lightning 1st 2021
The world in which we don't trade him unless we get what we need.In what world is current Patrik Laine worth a young 1C
And despite that talent you’re taking about, your team is at the basement of the league. I find it hard to believe that all CBJ needs is a top 6 C and everything will be alright again. Injuries play a part too but at some point you have to be realistic. 4 first round picks in a deep draft can do a lot for CBJ
Understandable. The same is also true - for our team - of the point of trading Laine at all.The point of trading for Laine would be to improve our team, not to massively downgrade
It doesn't matter what you think. That's the cost. You look like a Florida fan. Make a proposal that include Barkov. As an example:
To Columbus
Barkov
To Florida
Laine
Lightning 1st 2021
An established 1C under 25 years old. Do you need more clarity?
What NHL GM is going to be dumb enough to trade their young 1C for a 1 dimensional winger?
Coming off a season where he played at a 35 point pace, opposed to a season where he played at a 76 point pace. The very real possibility that no team will have a 1C under 25 demanding a trade this summer. Also, uncertainty of cost until an extension is signed while in a flat cap world. Not saying Columbus necessarily should trade him this summer, but am saying that if they do they are very unlikely to be able to get the same value for him as they paid.& as has the question been why should Columbus trade Laine for less today?
Coming off a season where he played at a 35 point pace, opposed to a season where he played at a 76 point pace. The very real possibility that no team will have a 1C under 25 demanding a trade this summer. Also, uncertainty of cost until an extension is signed while in a flat cap world. Not saying Columbus necessarily should trade him this summer, but am saying that if they do they are very unlikely to be able to get the same value for him as they paid.
Beat me to it. You get a cookie.The point was Jarmo isn’t looking to trade Laine today.
He’s been after Laine since the draft and the entire team had an abysmal season, not just Laine.
They have 3 1st round picks, Laine/Werenski/Jones and most likely a new coach next year.
Let’s see what Jarmo can build around his franchise players
There's only one player that comes to mind and I don't want to mention the name because he's overkill and it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever for the Blackhawks, and those are the sorts of circumstances that can start flamewars.
An established 1C under 25 years old. Do you need more clarity?
Hertl, sure. Couture's contract scares me too much.Couture or Hertl
1 for 1
Miller for Laine was discussed between me and another CBJ fan. What do you think, Viqsi?We're not trading him unless we get our major need (defensively-minded top-6 or even top-line center) filled. Otherwise, it makes infinitely more sense to QO him and see if we can get him rehabbed under new circumstances. Selling low would be potentially disastrous.
(Also, that "demotion to the 4th line" lasted for all of one shift.)