Dr Quincy
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2005
- 29,370
- 11,686
Should trade him to St. Louis for Shattenkirk.
No they shouldn't.
Should trade him to St. Louis for Shattenkirk.
Should trade him to St. Louis for Shattenkirk.
If he is their best player why they do not sign his first?
Man, Yzerman has been tested as a negotiator/ego manager in the last couple of years with Stamkos/Drouin and now Kucherov. Tampa fans must be clamoring for one of these guys to just go along with the plan
Hedman didn't seem to put up much of a fight. A player like that could easily command over 10 mil. I think at this point Tampa fans probably trust Yzerman. His hardball tactics have worked every time.
true...he's sorta due for a "loss" but still should be able to fit NK into the fold even with just a couple small moves..
He already has a loss, Lindback and Callahan(contract, not initial trade) weren't what I would call "wins" or "draws"
He already has a loss, Lindback and Callahan(contract, not initial trade) weren't what I would call "wins" or "draws"
There was that one defenseman too, what was his name? Catt Marle? It's like I have blocked him from my mind.
We've never had a player named Matt Carle.
No they shouldn't.
Sure Yzerman is going to give up 3 years of control of Kucherov for 1 year of Shattenkirk not happening. Pretty sure you're being sarcastic here but no way does Shattenkirk get you Kucherov.
Pacioretty for Kucherov, but MTL would need some assurance that he's sign and not bolt to the KHL, who are reportedly offering $6-7 M tax-free.
MTL would also have to clear some cap space.
Tampa's salary will be tax free too, and also in the six million dollar territory. It also won't be that ridiculous rubles currency, so...Pacioretty for Kucherov, but MTL would need some assurance that he's sign and not bolt to the KHL, who are reportedly offering $6-7 M tax-free.
MTL would also have to clear some cap space.
If he is their best player why they do not sign his first?
Tampa's salary will be tax free too, and also in the six million dollar territory. It also won't be that ridiculous rubles currency, so...
It's called negotiating. Why sign someone 8M+ if you can get him down to 7-7.5M? May not seem like much cap to hold out on, but that extra money could be used for other players/signings/etc.
They may be stuck on term too, who knows.
Already been discussed in multiple threads. Not only is Kucherov more valuable but the last thing the Lightning need is another LW. There's no deal to be made here.
ummm, no, Tampa's salary will NOT be tax free. Not only would he have to pay federal taxes, but state and local taxes in the other states/cities that he plays hockey games in.
Only problem is they signed stamkos for 8.5 first when kucherov has been their best forward. Might of made sence to try and sign kuch first at 7.5 and then sign stamkos