Speculation: Kucherov Will Not Attend Training Camp

Status
Not open for further replies.

Volodya Krutov

Lost Cosmonaut
Jan 18, 2012
8,135
1,036
Its just over because he actually has a spot on the team. Said alot about him when he became the biggest crybaby in America just because he had to go to the AHL for a short time.

Like people, particularly young adults, never change, once a spoiled brat, always a spoiled brat ?

Gimme a break.
 

tjs*

Registered User
Mar 18, 2016
2,103
0
Drouin's teen years seems to be clearly over. He's behaved like a true pro and a mature person since coming back. If he wants to win, I have no doubt he'll highly consider staying with Tampa, even on a bridge deal.

He seems to have grown up quite a bit (or at least learned to act like it in public), but I wouldn't go so far as to say that he wouldn't jump at a bigger deal if one were offered to him. The ceiling for a first and a third as compensation is a little over $5.6M; if he has a big season and postseason at an absolute minimum somebody will offer that for a couple years knowing we'll match just to keep us from bridging him cheaply. More likely though somebody will make a serious play for him with a higher AAV and possibly a longer term as well.
 

Volodya Krutov

Lost Cosmonaut
Jan 18, 2012
8,135
1,036
He seems to have grown up quite a bit (or at least learned to act like it in public), but I wouldn't go so far as to say that he wouldn't jump at a bigger deal if one were offered to him. The ceiling for a first and a third as compensation is a little over $5.6M; if he has a big season and postseason at an absolute minimum somebody will offer that for a couple years knowing we'll match just to keep us from bridging him cheaply. More likely though somebody will make a serious play for him with a higher AAV and possibly a longer term as well.

He made a big mistake, apologized and reported back to Syracuse. Only time will tell whether it was posturing but honestly, the past months have been very encouraging.
 

tjs*

Registered User
Mar 18, 2016
2,103
0
He made a big mistake, apologized and reported back to Syracuse. Only time will tell whether it was posturing but honestly, the past months have been very encouraging.

Encouraging, yes, but do you really think he's changed so much as to become the sort of guy who would leave money on the table? It's a pretty big leap from him possibly having learned to handle delayed gratification to him actually turning down gratification when it is available.
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Like people, particularly young adults, never change, once a spoiled brat, always a spoiled brat ?

Gimme a break.

Difference between beeing young and making mistakes and behaving like an idiot. Everyone knew including himself that what he did was incredibly dumb but he just didnt wanna play in the AHL. Going out publicly asking for a trade because you dont have a secure spot on one of the best teams in the NHL as a 20 year old is extremely arrogant. Specially after only scoring 4 goals in 70 games the season before. Sure he didnt get top line minutes but he had all the time in the world to impress them and he didnt.

It has nothing to do with beeing young, he behaved like an idot, his agent and people around him did aswell. Expecting a spot on a top NHL team as a 20 year old and not listening to the advice the coaches and management gives you is nothing else than arrogant as hell.
Im not saying he cant change etc but using the he is young so its ok to be an arrogant idiot is stupid imo. Its ok to make mistakes but he clearly knew what he was doing and had no problem doing it. I like him as a player, great offensive talent but man did he behave like an idiot for beeing sent down for a month or two...
 

Volodya Krutov

Lost Cosmonaut
Jan 18, 2012
8,135
1,036
Encouraging, yes, but do you really think he's changed so much as to become the sort of guy who would leave money on the table? It's a pretty big leap from him possibly having learned to handle delayed gratification to him actually turning down gratification when it is available.

The beef he had with Tampa's management hasn't had anything to do with them dough tho. So maybe Drouin is a greedy mother***** too, who knows, I'm just saying it's highly speculative for the moment.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,924
24,272
NB
Encouraging, yes, but do you really think he's changed so much as to become the sort of guy who would leave money on the table? It's a pretty big leap from him possibly having learned to handle delayed gratification to him actually turning down gratification when it is available.

The idea that TB players are leaving huge chunks of money on the table is a myth.
 

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
Got a text today(family member somewhat in the know) saying "If you haven't done your draft yet heads up, expect Nikita Kucherov to be signed for season opener"
 

CupsOverCash

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
16,533
7,305
Exactly. And Drouin's certainly not going to be the one to do so.

I don't think we can say this with certainty as of yet. I can see him taking a bridge deal like the rest of his teammates have. Palat and Johnson took bridge deals, Kuch is about to take a bridge deal from the sounds of things.

Economically and from a cap standpoint it makes sense from a team that is good and stays competitive. If he has a successful season and the team goes far again in the playoffs this a great situation for him to be in no?

Look we all know he acted like a brat last year but it sounds like he had some points to why he did what he did but he handled it like a brat. I think he has matured and learned that it wasn't the right way to do things. Coop seemed to learn what he did so I think that relationship is good now.

You know what fixes relationships and builds strong ones? Winning. And for a guy like Jo I think he has a lot of pride being able to be on a winning team and helping that team win.

Like Kuch I bet he does enjoy it here and if the team keeps winning it will help team stay together. They won't want to go elsewhere. But the no instate tax does help guys make up for the change they would get elsewhere. So it kinds of works out in the end.
 

Sky04

Registered User
Jan 8, 2009
29,687
19,021
Exactly. And Drouin's certainly not going to be the one to do so.

What large money would Drouin be leaving? The best position he could put himself in for a payday is to do a bridge deal because as of right now 2/3 years on his ELC have been weak performances.

Even a "greedy" player would know this, he has little leverage on his next contract even with a big season this year.
 

DFC

Registered User
Sep 26, 2013
47,924
24,272
NB
I don't think we can say this with certainty as of yet. I can see him taking a bridge deal like the rest of his teammates have. Palat and Johnson took bridge deals, Kuch is about to take a bridge deal from the sounds of things.

Economically and from a cap standpoint it makes sense from a team that is good and stays competitive. If he has a successful season and the team goes far again in the playoffs this a great situation for him to be in no?

Look we all know he acted like a brat last year but it sounds like he had some points to why he did what he did but he handled it like a brat. I think he has matured and learned that it wasn't the right way to do things. Coop seemed to learn what he did so I think that relationship is good now.

You know what fixes relationships and builds strong ones? Winning. And for a guy like Jo I think he has a lot of pride being able to be on a winning team and helping that team win.

Like Kuch I bet he does enjoy it here and if the team keeps winning it will help team stay together. They won't want to go elsewhere. But the no instate tax does help guys make up for the change they would get elsewhere. So it kinds of works out in the end.

A bridge deal makes more sense for drouin because of where he'll be at in his career. His personality doesn't really matter, I think.
 

tjs*

Registered User
Mar 18, 2016
2,103
0
I don't think we can say this with certainty as of yet. I can see him taking a bridge deal like the rest of his teammates have. Palat and Johnson took bridge deals, Kuch is about to take a bridge deal from the sounds of things.

Economically and from a cap standpoint it makes sense from a team that is good and stays competitive. If he has a successful season and the team goes far again in the playoffs this a great situation for him to be in no?

Look we all know he acted like a brat last year but it sounds like he had some points to why he did what he did but he handled it like a brat. I think he has matured and learned that it wasn't the right way to do things. Coop seemed to learn what he did so I think that relationship is good now.

You know what fixes relationships and builds strong ones? Winning. And for a guy like Jo I think he has a lot of pride being able to be on a winning team and helping that team win.

Like Kuch I bet he does enjoy it here and if the team keeps winning it will help team stay together. They won't want to go elsewhere. But the no instate tax does help guys make up for the change they would get elsewhere. So it kinds of works out in the end.

You could well be right; I just don't see him settling for a Palat/Johnson-like <$4M bridge deal like some of the guys on the Lightning board insist that he'll get. I think that (assuming he stays healthy and this season/postseason continues to build on what he did in the playoffs) he's too good and our cap situation too precarious for some team not to offer him either a more enticing bridge deal or a long term deal in an effort to either steal him away from us or to at least force us to lose somebody important to keep him. In the end I think he'll either be signed long term or at a minimum bridged in the high $5M range like it's looking like Kucherov might be.

Think of it this way: suppose we try to bridge him at $4M x 2 years. Another team could offer him as much as $5.6M x 2 and only give up a first and a third if we didn't match. Even for a highly risk adverse GM that's a pretty safe bet: the odds are very much in favor of Drouin outperforming or at least living up to that contract, if he does you've got an elite player at a reasonable salary for a ridiculously cheap asset cost and another two years of team control remaining once that initial contract ends, and if for some reason he underperforms that deal (say he keeps skating with his head down, gets lit up, and develops severe concussion issues) you're only on the hook for two seasons and only lost a first and a third. Drouin's potential is easily worth that risk (again, assuming he stays healthy and performs at a high level this season/postseason.) Of course the Lightning would match that offer - we aren't going to lose him that cheaply - but it would stress our financial situation further and force us to lose another top six forward, and we wouldn't have the security of having him signed to a long term deal.

That's just if somebody wants to screw with our cap situation with almost no chance of actually stealing Drouin from us, but also very little risk and high potential reward if for some crazy reason we decided not to match. If a team really wants to try to grab him from us they can offer him a long term deal at a price they hope we won't match. As with the previous scenario unless the offer were completely unreasonable we'd likely still match it, but it would once again prevent us from bridging him cheaply and cost us one of our other top six forwards in the process.

So basically I think we're going to be best off signing Drouin to a long term deal if we can at all afford to do so. I simply don't see us bridging him at a level that would allow us to keep all of our top six forwards anyway and rather than pay him in the mid to high $5M range for a couple years I'd rather throw another million in there to get him on a fixed cost long term.
 

tjs*

Registered User
Mar 18, 2016
2,103
0
What large money would Drouin be leaving? The best position he could put himself in for a payday is to do a bridge deal because as of right now 2/3 years on his ELC have been weak performances.

Even a "greedy" player would know this, he has little leverage on his next contract even with a big season this year.

Like I've said several times you have to look at the trend. While you might want to pay him only for what he's done in the past, some team is going to look at what he did in the playoffs this year and (assuming he continues to build on that performance) what he does this upcoming season/postseason, anticipate that he will at least continue to perform at that level and quite possibly keep getting better, and make him an appropriate offer accordingly. Drouin took a while to get going but unless he regresses this year it's pretty clear that he's going to be an elite player going forward; if we lowball him somebody will gladly pay him what he's worth and we'll be forced to match or lose him. The leverage doesn't come from Drouin - it comes from other teams recognizing his elite talent and our cap situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad