The thing is who cares if it looks like you're building a team if the team you build never does anything.
No player is ever going to want to go to a team that never commits to trying to win a championship.
I realize I am dating myself, but there are many teams that work to be championship teams and never sell the farm.
Ottawa, NB, are 2 of them. Oshawa is usually never that long out of things. But the players will report because they want to win games and more importantly they want to develop so tht they have a chance at PRO hockey after they leave the OHL.
There's no team other than London that is a consistent contender - every other team has bad years here and there, Peterborough and Kitchener now, Oshawa a couple years back. The difference with those teams is that there's a confidence that they can rebuild.
As far as the coach - I have no idea what Mann's long term plans are - but you run the risk of a coach leaving to the NHL. As a former pro coach I'd have to imagine his end goal is to get back into the pro ranks. The thing you'd want is a consistent system where you develop assistants that can take over if the head coach leaves to go pro.
Kingston has shown in the last couple years that they cannot draft well - the '05 draft was solid but it's been awful in the three years since (jury is obviously still out on the '08s but no 1st isn't a good start). If they can't draft, the only way to acquire players is via trades, and you have to give value to get value.
Based off that Wakely offer posted earlier Kingston hasn't learned anything and if they buy like that the year they "need" will tank this team for at least 2-3 years.
No agent is going to say draft my star player, play him minimally, do not develop him and then trade him as part of a deal to another team so that you can suck for 3 years.
Kingston did that under Mav and Gilmour. How did they do? How many players said that they would not report if drafted? Take a look at the talent that they ended up drafting because stars would not report.
Malhorta might have reported is the team had the developmental skills and a better reputation.
How many people here have talked about you need to trade your 08 to get the stud you need. If that is the attitude of the team, then agents are going to say sorry for not reporting to trade him now Or now move to a different league.
The only reason that you got Shane Wright was that he had no choice he had to report here. I would bet looking at Caputi he probably wished he did not have to.
If you want a fan base, you need to bring in good players. If you want to have a realistic chance at hosting tournaments like the M Cup, you need a team with a consistent plan.
Wakely will want to join a team that will help him develop further or win. Kingston is on that team.
If Kington wants to be treated as a serious place to lay, then they need to set up a serious system. Right now, the rookie GM sees the pitfalls and has learned, we hope, from his mistakes.
Mann is establishing a work ethic and system. The assistants that he has are also learning his system so that if he gets an offer, and I don't see that happening for a couple of years, they can step in.
Kingston fans, and for 21 years, I was one do not care about building and rebuilding. They are not going to buy season tickets if they know the product will be good this year and suck the next 3. It is not worth it.
OHL fans want a night out that will not break the bank. They want a night out where they know they will be entertained. I'm not sure how many people remember MisterDB, but one of the reasons he quit, besides cost, was that the team was going to be pathetic.
You guys are lucky there is only university and military hockey to compete against. But can you say tht if you trade away the future of the team the team will be worth the dollar value next year?