Yes, because despite the popular memes around here, 20 goals/40 points is a solid floor for complementary top-six production, even disregarding the "****ty Kings offense" tax, and that's going with Toffoli's worst season rather than his best or average.
I think the jury is still out on Kempe obviously but I like his odds of being at least a 50 point guy.
Do I wish they could be better? Absolutely. But I'm also not as eager to totally drain them as non-top-six-forwards just to fulfill an arbitrary "kings suck at drafting" meme.
Edit: For perspective, the Tampa Bay lightning were far and away--by 19 goals over Winnipeg--the best offense in the league last year. After Kucherov (100) and Stamkos (86), their next forwards were Point (66), Gourde (64), Johnson (50), Killorn (47). Then 44, 35....
Tyler Toffoli's WORST full season is as a 2nd liner for the best offense in the league.
Please understand I said the issue is with drafting or development, because if the best we can get from 2010 and 2016 is Toffoli, Pearson, and Kempe, then there are valid questions on what is the organization doing. In the same time, the Kings have developed/gave extra hope to:
Jones (starting in the NHL)
Campbell (salvaged him into an NHL backup after he was an ECHL healthy scratch)
Bernier (was still developing with the Kings, then he got worse after he left the organization)
Ben Scrivens (was a solid backup and then fell off the face of the earth joining Edmonton)
Jhonas Enroth (put up respectable numbers on the Kings then fell off the face of the earth with Toronto/Europe)
Peter Budaj (Actually was a starter on the Kings, was cannon fodder in TB, and then is being resuscitated again)
The only two players in the same time which have shown no hope in the NHL even with the Kings are:
Jeff Zatkoff
Erik Ersberg
I'm not saying the Kings need to develop 5 or 6 top six forwards, but if we are considering Toffoli and Iafallo as top six forwards developed in a six year span, that's not enough. It would take 18 years for the organization to say they have fully developed their own top six.
I think the problem is we're not establishing a metric of what is considered acceptable as far as drafting, development. I have HOPES for Amadio, Wagner, JAD, Vilardi, etc. But I am unsure of the organization's capacity to truly develop a top line talent.