River Meadow
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2016
- 6,994
- 9,378
I think the vast majority of people are actually indifferent, because he is extremely forgettable on the ice.
mid as the kids would say
mid af no cap
I think the vast majority of people are actually indifferent, because he is extremely forgettable on the ice.
mid as the kids would say
I don't understand how you expect people to take what you say seriously with takes like this one, not to mention the fact that you seem to really take a lot of joy from criticizing Slafkovsky's play.
Do you have video evidence of him not looking like a total pied-de-celeri ?You, rehabs, and maybe 1-2 others are the only one thinking that. Maybe it’s blind hate at this point or an inability to be objective.
He’s looking better than last season. The last game was better than the game prior. But he’s not “great”.serious question for all the people who think Slaf look great, at what point is it important to you that his play translate to points? Will you change your mind at 1-3 points in 20 games? 5 points in 40? Just wondering
Pretty much every game he’s played this year. What’s your point?No, I take joy from seeing Cole Caufield score goals in bunches. Xhekaj destroying people left and right. Carey Price being one of the most dominant hockey player Ive seen.
I take in no joy from the Habs sucking, lol.
If you believe he looks more confident and better right now than he did in his D year, its probably because you did not follow his draft year.
Do you have video evidence of him not looking like a total pied-de-celeri ?
Show me video evidence. You know that cognitive bias can go either way ? You can choose to see good thing in a player and ignore the bad, you can choose to be overly positive. You also know that this happens way more often in the case of fans of a team, right ? Well, choose isn't the right word.Pretty much every game he’s played this year. What’s your point?
Would you be happier if he had 4 points in 5 games but was not actually playing good?
The question was when one should be worried about his lack of production. Certainly a pace of 1 point per 6 games would be a disaster at 36 games in, but I was making a point about sample size. 36 is close to his 39 last year and would be a good barometer for his development and his production. There should still be a good chunk of AHL games and hopeful postseason left if he's not cutting it.So were gonna waste 6 more months of development because "its too early to see".
Jack Hughes had and has way more offensive potential than any current Habs though.
serious question for all the people who think Slaf look great, at what point is it important to you that his play translate to points? Will you change your mind at 1-3 points in 20 games? 5 points in 40? Just wondering
Not sure for reason behind Hughes / Slaf comparison.Man this Hughes talk needs to stop. Hughes is one of the best skaters in the league and had skill to burn. Yes he needed time to put it all together but he always had those elite traits. Slaf on the other hand had a very questionable skillset and besides size and compete, not sure what you can say he's elite at. Definitely need to wait and see because he's gonna be creating offense through his size and compete moreso than his skill like Hughes.
I disagree. It's exactly the fundamentals that are the problem with him.The discussion here is quite different from that when Galchenyuk was a young player.
AG27 had outstanding production, but worries began to accumulate about his weak defensive play and some of his lazy habits like not moving often enough.
With Slaf, he's not producing, but the fundamentals appear more positive.
One: Initial breakaway, nice, but he fans on the shot and it's an easy stop for the Sabres goaltender.
I said it was nice , no? Good instincts and burst of speed.Funny how you focus on the missed shot but you ignore that he stole the puck from, and outskated Rasmus Dahlin.
I said it was nice , no? Good instincts and burst of speed.
The shot though is laughable at best.
Not really.The point is simply that it took him 100 games before really going.
Anyways, KK did get miss managed by both Julien and Ducharme.
" great shift , he did a normal pass"No, I take joy from seeing Cole Caufield score goals in bunches. Xhekaj destroying people left and right. Carey Price being one of the most dominant hockey player Ive seen.
I take in no joy from the Habs sucking, lol.
If you believe he looks more confident and better right now than he did in his D year, its probably because you did not follow his draft year.
Do you have video evidence of him not looking like a total pied-de-celeri ?
I said the exact same stuff last week but he was very good last night. He shouldn't be in the NHL, that's the problem. I do see some good progress though." great shift , he did a normal pass"
He's getting there.
Quoting from last GDT.
How about something on the scoreboard or we just jump of joy because of normal nhl basic plays.
Im like you , We don't see any WoW factor
" great shift , he did a normal pass"
He's getting there.
Quoting from last GDT.
How about something on the scoreboard or we just jump of joy because of normal nhl basic plays.
Im like you , We don't see any WoW factor
Trying him out with Caufield and Suzuki could flush out what he needs to work on. They’re good offensive players, and if he can’t work well with them, we’ll see why. They’re good at finding space, supporting, going to the middle of the ice … and how they time it all, which is key.Newhook has produced with 5 different players, Slaf has produced with no one.
When do we start blaming Slaf for actually not producing ? I haven't watched last game, but Slaf is an anchor out there. He doesn't tilt the ice, he doesn't make positive plays, he's not good at retrieving pucks, he doesn't shoot, he doesn't drive the net, he doesn't intimidate, he doesn't play good defense, basically whats his strength ?
The sneering! The bleating! The gloating!If Slaf had scored the goal Pearson scored, that would have been talked about here for a month by some..
Because scrub Pearson scored it though, it's meh.
You are seeing more plays that result in scoring chances, and much fewer plays that result in scoring chances given up, compared to last year, but also compared to our other forwards this year. Slafkovsky is getting the 4th most ES time on ice among forwards, and the scoring chances for the club are much greater than the scoring chances against." great shift , he did a normal pass"
He's getting there.
Quoting from last GDT.
How about something on the scoreboard or we just jump of joy because of normal nhl basic plays.
Im like you , We don't see any WoW factor