I’m talking in a vacuum. Miller at 26 with 5 years left on a team friendly contract is worth more than Miller at 29 with a year and a half left until UFA. That factors in. Just like other things like hiscimproved play, potential retention, and taking cap dumps back factor in. It’s not as simple as saying he’s better now so he’s worth more than Vancouver gave up to get him
well obviously it all factors in. Dont you think if that wasnt factored in the ask for Miller at 50% would be even higher?
Player A makes 5.25M 5 more years and is a 50point immature 25 year old
Player B makes 2.625M for 2 years and is a 75 point vocal leader 28 year old
All else considered, they are equal. Who would cost more in a trade? Obviously player B. Player A is Miller when we got him, player B would be Miller today. So why would we take the same price or less for him?
To further demonstrate recent example as to why he's worth around what i've said. Blake Coleman is the most recent trade that would match Miller's 50% value. Same age, half a season less left on contract, 1.8M vs 2.625M. He returned a 1st projected to be a 10-20 overall pick + a recent 1st rounder whom was not even 1 year removed from the draft. So i actually lowballed the original value of Foote.
Coleman returned 2 1sts 0 cap coming back
Miller should return more than 2 1sts given that he costs 625k more BUT Ritchie has 0 value and this trade would cost the Leafs only 125k in cap space per year vs 1.8M it cost the Lightning
2 late 1sts and a late 2nd is minimum value Miller at 50% should be returning