admiralcadillac
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2017
- 7,609
- 6,908
Yeah you're absolutely right.
It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact he's 34 years old and looks terrible.
Honestly no - this is beyond the player
Yeah you're absolutely right.
It couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact he's 34 years old and looks terrible.
Trading assets for Petry is something a fool like Fletcher would do, instead of securing the best draft pick possible.I don't see his acquisition cost being very high after the year he's had as well as age.
A team I could see interested in him is Philly TBH. They have a large core of their defense hitting Free Agency this summer and without Ellis in the lineup their top 4 is complete shambles (hence their record this year). I think a top 4 of Provorov, Ellis, Sanheim, and Petry would be a lot more consistent than what they have now. Also if Ellis were to suffer another injury Petry is capable of playing those top pairing minutes in his place.
I don’t see why the reason for him signing in Montreal was to be close to Michigan. It’s a 10 he drive and or an international flight.
there are many closer places he could have signed in the states.
Ok it just seems really weird. 10 hrs and a border is not close to drive.Just an FYI Petry himself listed it as one of the reasons he signed in Montreal like 7 years ago.
Ok it just seems really weird. 10 hrs and a border is not close to drive.
Pretty much the whole eastern conference is closer.
If you take into account borders for flights I would say the western us teams too?
I mean if the man said it he believes it. Which is all that counts in this case. But very odd….
honestly if Petry had less term I would agree with this return
That being said he is a 34 year old dman who is signed for 3 more years at a 6.25 million cap hit, outside of the budget teams actual salary doesnt matter only cap hit does and that is rough for a dman that is looking like he regressed this year (but it could also be because montreal has not played great this year). Could Petry recover sure, objectively do i think he will recover yes, if I was gm and i was going for a dman i would not pay that price as a bet though at least not with Petry's contract
Sabres definitely not including Levi but I would up the pick up to one of our late 1st rounders and a B prospect. Maybe even a mid pick in 2023 as well.I could see Buffalo having interest...
And with the Sabres having loads of cap space to take on Petry's salary, the Habs wouldn't have to take back a cap dump
To Buffalo: Petry
To Montreal: 2022 2nd
Or maybe there's a way to get Levi in the deal if Buffalo has decided UPL is their goalie of the future
To Buffalo: Petry
To Montreal: Levi
Isn't Petrys game built around good skating/mobility and having a good hockey brain. The few Habs games I have watched those both appear to be there still. Someone is going to get a very capable top4 dman for I'm guessing pretty cheap.
Depends on whether montreal wants to retain or not to make it happen. With retention I might call it even. otherwise I think at least a 3rd rounder or a prospect may be in order.Yeah.. because Petry wanting to be close to Michigan is the main thing that is wrong with that proposal /s
I'm just curious which team @golffuul thinks should be adding to this "starting point"
It is a weird situation for sure, I wouldn't be surprised to see a shift similar to the Dubois shift in CBJ last year. On the other hand, MTL just waived Niku, which seems to indicate they are keeping Petry for now...I am a bit confused - yesterday it was reported that Hughes said he told Petry he would trade him when he got a decent offer in return but that Petry hadn't requested a trade, but Francois Gagnon came out yesterday on Hockey 360 (RDS) to say that Petry for sure asked for a trade. Which is it? And shouldnt you bench a player you think of trading in favour of protecting him from injury?
If management feel there isn't a deal worth making Petry won't be traded .I am a bit confused - yesterday it was reported that Hughes said he told Petry he would trade him when he got a decent offer in return but that Petry hadn't requested a trade, but Francois Gagnon came out yesterday on Hockey 360 (RDS) to say that Petry for sure asked for a trade. Which is it? And shouldnt you bench a player you think of trading in favour of protecting him from injury?
Girard is one of the leagues best transition Dmen, is 11 years younger, and signed at a lower caphit for his entire prime. And you think a 3rd round pick is all it would take to bridge the gap in value?Depends on whether montreal wants to retain or not to make it happen. With retention I might call it even. otherwise I think at least a 3rd rounder or a prospect may be in order.
No way on Levi, you don’t trade a goalie prospect that hot. Not sure if petry fits the Sabres youth going forwards- depends on what he wants, but if he’s disinterested in mtl I think Buffalo becomes a difficult sell.
a starting point for who? lolCould see Petry for Samuel Girard as a starting point.
I think he's still capable of performing at a high level as he did last year. He's not slower this year. It's simply his desire, judgment and concentration that seem to be lacking.
At 34, he can still fill in the role of a No2 or No3 defenseman on a team with a two or three year window. He has a style of play that fits in well with a team like Pittsburgh or the Rangers although I don't think he'll end up there.
Detroit, Chicago and Columbus are close to Michigan. Of course, flight options and times are probably more relevant. If Petry has a no trade list, that is going to factor in quite heavily.