Baksfamous112
Registered User
- Jul 21, 2016
- 8,394
- 5,807
Trading Petry now would be a huge mistake. There's just no way to get value after this disastrous season given how poorly he's played. At the same time, I find it incredibly unlike the guy went from Norris talks to entirely forgetting how to play hockey.
It's better to revist this next season when he, hopefully, rebounds.
I think most teams have a longer memory than us posters - he is done in MTL but he's a great add for a team going for it.
yepthe idea would be to flip klingberg for a more desirable prospect. dallas could do that on their own but than their sending the message their giving up on the season
they'll look at his body of work from the last five years, not the goldfish memory takes of HF postersThe sales job would be in luring teams with how Petry played not even one year ago, not how he's performed in current circumstances on a Montreal team in freefall. NHL GM's are going to look at his body of work and based on how most of them operate, they're expect the older Petry and discount the circumstances of his current situation.
The thing is that he probably won't come to next year's camp in Mtl if we still have him. I think he will get traded this summer if we can't at the deadline.Trading Petry now would be a huge mistake. There's just no way to get value after this disastrous season given how poorly he's played. At the same time, I find it incredibly unlike the guy went from Norris talks to entirely forgetting how to play hockey.
It's better to revist this next season when he, hopefully, rebounds.
Yeah no. As a Habs fan, Girard is better than Petry, younger and cheaper. But you are right, Girard isn't a need for the Habs right now.No it wouldn't because Girard isn't a need for the Habs and Petry is clearly the better player , if they do move him it'll be for a better return than Girard IMO .
We don't, it's just some twisted scenario in which we trade Klingberg for a higher return. It makes 0 sense to me.Why do the Habs need Klingberg anyway? Why not just get a first for Lehkonen and whatever we can for Petry
The thing is that he probably won't come to next year's camp in Mtl if we still have him. I think he will get traded this summer if we can't at the deadline.
This is the actual right answer, especially in a world where top Defenceman are getting 8-9M+ petry is a 3 year gamble where his point totals had him at just outside the Norris race. For a GM who has an average position Lifespan of about 5 years he’s a worthwhile gamble for a team assuming this year is the outlierI think most teams have a longer memory than us posters - he is done in MTL but he's a great add for a team going for it.
they'll look at his body of work from the last five years, not the goldfish memory takes of HF posters
It will be a 3 way trades if Petry is trade to Dallas vs Klingberg. I don’t care at all to acquire a pending UFA in Klingberg wich won’t bring anything to us and leave next summer. We don’t need cap space too for the next 2 years, so to have Petry under our salary cap doesnt bother me at all.. we want futures and we could retain salary on klingberg if it’s a 3 way trade. But thats it. I don’t want to be stuck with himAbsolutely. Hence why Dallas is a great trade partners for a deal including Klingberg and Petry. Both players asked for trades. Both players won't be back next year with their current team. Klingberg will be traded before the deadline. Dallas needs a replacement at least for this year's race.
And there is a lot of time to figure this out with a third team being interested in Klingberg for futures.
I could see Flames, Preds and Toronto as teams interested in Klingberg. Preds could also be interested to Petry directly.
We don't, it's just some twisted scenario in which we trade Klingberg for a higher return. It makes 0 sense to me.
It will be a 3 way trades if Petry is trade to Dallas vs Klingberg. I don’t care at all to acquire a pending UFA in Klingberg wich won’t bring anything to us and leave next summer. We don’t need cap space too for the next 2 years, so to have Petry under our salary cap doesnt bother me at all.. we want futures and we could retain salary on klingberg if it’s a 3 way trade. But thats it. I don’t want to be stuck with him
It makes alot of sense. It's just a matter making it work. Most probably, it won't work, but if they can find a third team to work with, who knows.
Petry won't get many suitors if you ask me. Also, Petry has a 15 teams no trade lists. So it narrows things down alot. But Dallas may be one of the teams that check both requirements. Maybe also Nashville. I can see Toronto and Flames also having interest in Petry but i doubt Petry accepts a trade to another canadian team.
The other interesting thing is in a process of a three way deal, Habs can retain on both Petry and Klinberg.
Yeah no. As a Habs fan, Girard is better than Petry, younger and cheaper. But you are right, Girard isn't a need for the Habs right now.
Why does everyone with any kind of nhl connection say he is generating interest but you don’t believe he will?
If I'm a contending team, I take Petry over Girard every day.
I respect your opinion but I see Girard as a Victor Mete type in a much better situation on a much , much better team , I think that if he played for the Habs the narrative would go something like this - small , weak , overpaid d-man for multiple years that the Habs would have to pay assets to move . Just my opinion though , cheers .Yeah no. As a Habs fan, Girard is better than Petry, younger and cheaper. But you are right, Girard isn't a need for the Habs right now.