If you check his numbers you will see that he is really high every year when talking about ES producers, you don't end up 4th overall in es points by centers by twisting the stats, you have to be damn good as well. Where he and the rest of the team struggles is the PP. On ES he's an elite point producer while being decent defensively and good at the draw.
PS
That's worth far more than pieces that are getting mentioned in this thread.
I didn't mention a single thing about whether or not the pieces offered were fair or not, I was merely commenting on the fact that he could be deemed inconsistent given his production.
There is a reason why Duchene keeps making Team Canada (Olympics, WCH, etc).
He is a pretty damn good player playing on a pretty bad team. His even strength production has been elite for years now. What is holding him back is the lack of points on the powerplay. Which IMO is mainly an Avs problem. How Tim Army has managed to keep his job for almost a decade now is a complete mistery to me.
Is he as good as Tavares?
No. But he is closer than you might want to believe.
He would be easily the Islanders 2nd best player. Very easily.
So it would need to be a kings ransom for the Avs to even consider.
Hamonic would probably the only legitimate starting point.
And than you would have to add one of Beauvillier or Barzal to get it done.
That price is very steep but everything else does not make any sense at all.
You are not getting the guy that might prompt Tavares to stay and therefore save your franchise for futures and 2nd tier pieces....
He makes team Canada because he's a good player. I didn't say anything about him not being a good player. I also didn't mention Tavares, and he would easily be the second best player on the Islanders. I also never suggested that Duchene should be had for futures and 2nd tier pieces. Furthermore, I'd do Hamonic and Barzal/Beauvillier.
Don't let that fool you. He isn't even a 60 point player, except in his career years.
(43 points in 47 games during lockout year and 59 points in 76 games are being conveniently misrepresented here)
I don't count pace usually. It's too hard to judge. Plenty of guys would have better numbers if seasons were shortened. He produced well in the lockout year, but how do any of us know he actually hits 60 if it were a full season?
Yeah, the only time he played with any real talent on his line he was at ppg. But we are just twisting the stats to make him look better than he really is.
Yes, some are.
Speaking of twisting things to make him appear better than he is, your first sentence is a pretty dishonest evaluation to make him appear worse than he is. Are we going to hold it against Duchene that a 48 game lockout season existed? He was on pace for 75 points in those 48 games. Or last year, when he had 59 points but was injured for 6 games, which means he would have comfortably broken 60 points there too?
No, it's not a dishonest evaluation. That's an accurate description of what he's actually done in the past three seasons. I'm not holding a lockout shortened season against anyone, but it should certainly be treated different, for every player, than other seasons. Injuries are fair, I suppose, but the fact remains that he didn't play and didn't hit 60 points. I'd be fine calling him a 60 point player, but my post wasn't about whether he was or he wasn't. My post was a response to someone using a very obviously cherry picked stat to try to prove that Duchene couldn't be considered inconsistent.