I hate Dater so much.
I do too, but he didn't say anything regarding a trade. We're just having fun speculating.
I hate Dater so much.
Barzal and Hamonic for Landeskog gets it done.
Key word: available. Snow didn't trade Hamonic when he aired out a trade request and Taylor Hall was rumored to be offered, he's not giving him up now that the request has been rescinded and he's DEFINITELY not giving him up with their #1 prospect for a player who isn't as good as Hall (no offense, Landy).
What does the Avalanche forward group look like?
Could they withstand trading Duchene for some quantity like Nelson/Lee/Strome ++ to improve their depth?
Falling in the standings can make teams do crazy ****. lol
At this point I'm nervous that Tavares isn't untouchable.
What does the Avalanche forward group look like?
Could they withstand trading Duchene for some quantity like Nelson/Lee/Strome ++ to improve their depth?
The forward group was the lowest scoring in the league going into last night. It was three top 6 forwards: Duchene, MacKinnon, and Landeskog, and Duchene is easily the best offensive producer of that group right now. Losing him would be a massive blow. Basically, they could use more depth, absolutely, but losing Duchene to do that doesn't seem like much of an option right now. It's robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Barzal and Hamonic for Landeskog gets it done.
Doubt that very much.
Isles wouldn't do it anyway. Overpayment
It is and it isn't. Right now our centers are Tavares-Strome-Nelson-Cizikas. Moving one of Strome or Nelson to wing and adding Duchene would definitely make us have a better roster. Strome played well at wing two seasons ago. Most people think he's struggled because he was playing out of position at wing last year and not center. I think he's playing poorly because of a lack of confidence.
I'd much rather try to acquire MacKinnon and play him on JT's right wing, but of course that's not up to me.
That's what it takes to get a young established forward on that good of a contract lol.
That's what it takes to get a young established forward on that good of a contract lol.
Duchene is the only real good offensive player on the Avs. Avs are screwed for a long time if they do that as Landeskog isn't an offense driver and MacKinnon, well... Would rather trade MacKinnon while he has value. Dude won't put it together. He has zero hockey sense.
Would build the offense around Duchene, Rantanen and Jost.
what do you think you are getting with hamonic? a young established top 4 dman on a good contract. arguably more valuable than a young established fwd would be.
replace forward with defenseman and you could say the same thing about hamonic, no? why would we throw in our best prospect as well?
edit: didnt see the post above mine
What would you be looking for in return for Mackinnon?
Just stop. The Avs are not trading their captain. The Avs are not trading their best offensive player.
We are 7-8-1 with a new coach + system and we've gone through a pretty tough schedule to start the year. Avs management wouldn't make a quality for quantity/futures trade at this point in the season.
From an Avs point of view, the one guy from our core that has seemed to have the most difficult time adapting to the new coach is Barrie. He's having a tough time so far to start the year and it's tough to pinpoint the reasons why but he's making bad decisions with the puck and hasn't been himself. We could certainly use a guy who's stronger defensively even if it meant losing the offensive dimension that Barrie has proven to be able to bring over the past few years.
So for that reason, a Hamonic for Barrie as a base for a deal makes sense for the Avs. I can't say I know the Islanders situation enough to claim whether or not it does on their end.
Just stop. The Avs are not trading their captain. The Avs are not trading their best offensive player.
We are 7-8-1 with a new coach + system and we've gone through a pretty tough schedule to start the year. Avs management wouldn't make a quality for quantity/futures trade at this point in the season.
From an Avs point of view, the one guy from our core that has seemed to have the most difficult time adapting to the new coach is Barrie. He's having a tough time so far to start the year and it's tough to pinpoint the reasons why but he's making bad decisions with the puck and hasn't been himself. We could certainly use a guy who's stronger defensively even if it meant losing the offensive dimension that Barrie has proven to be able to bring over the past few years.
So for that reason, a Hamonic for Barrie as a base for a deal makes sense for the Avs. I can't say I know the Islanders situation enough to claim whether or not it does on their end.
What are you laughing at?