keonsbitterness
Registered User
If I were a mod, you'd be banned a week for that post.I bet his favourite band is ...
Neckleback
I’ll kindly usher myself out now
If I were a mod, you'd be banned a week for that post.I bet his favourite band is ...
Neckleback
I’ll kindly usher myself out now
LmaoLOL!
I really think is favorite band is Neck Deep! But 'Neckleback' could be a close second! lmfao!
Not sure honestly. There are nights where they are easily our best pairing (no question they are the most physical) but the B2Bs they have looked like chickens with their heads cut off out there.Seems like they fatigue easier than the rest of our team. Wonder if it's skating related, Muzzin is just slow and Holl is a bit of a laboured skater even if speed isn't an issue
The Habs were worse. That is the type of team you can't enjoy having to watch every night.
Rielly's job here isn't to have a tight gap though - the forwards are the forecheckers, he's there for insurance if someone gets through.
For Rielly to have a tight gap here, before the forwards both gamble, he would have had to be up with them near centre ice, which is terribly risky, just asking for a breakaway against. One guy has to be back playing it safe, and it's the dman.
Before the forwards both gamble, all 3 Leafs are in good position. In this situation one of Matthews/Marner can pressure the puck carrier, but the other one must stay back - they totally bif that by both pressuring the puck. In that half second the play goes from "the 3 of us are in great position to defend the rush" to "potential 2-on-1". But even then, Matthews still could have saved it by simply back-checking hard, but he was lazy in a crucial moment.
Blaming Rielly here is blaming him for not pulling out some magic to save boneheaded plays by the forwards. The real issue is the boneheaded plays by the forwards. You want him to have a tight gap here ... that means him being up in the neutral zone during the Flames breakout, which is just
You know with all of our additions it’s going to be a bottleneck for shifts and playing time on that 4th lineIf I were a mod, you'd be banned a week for that post.
playoff lines
Marner - Matthews - Gally
Hyman - Tavares - Nylander
Mik - Foligno - Simmons
Thornton - Kerfoot - Spezza
Nash and Robertson would be next up
All players have off games.The most frustrating thing about this team is when there star players feel like they don't have to try and just rely on their skill. Marner and Matthews are incredible players but it's nights like tonight that frustrate the living crap out of me. They need to have that killer instinct and bring it every night. Very rarely do you see the greats take days off. Don't get me wrong, I'm not expecting them to light it up every night but for Tavares, even when he wasn't scoring, his effort level never dropped. Marner and Matthews tend to have these nights off here and there being our best players, that's a problem. Let's hope playoff time is a different story.
lmfao , Engvalls fav song! lol
Rielly's job here isn't to have a tight gap though - the forwards are the forecheckers, he's there for insurance if someone gets through.
For Rielly to have a tight gap here, before the forwards both gamble, he would have had to be up with them near centre ice, which is terribly risky, just asking for a breakaway against. One guy has to be back playing it safe, and it's the dman.
Before the forwards both gamble, all 3 Leafs are in good position. In this situation one of Matthews/Marner can pressure the puck carrier, but the other one must stay back - they totally bif that by both pressuring the puck. In that half second the play goes from "the 3 of us are in great position to defend the rush" to "potential 2-on-1". But even then, Matthews still could have saved it by simply back-checking hard, but he was lazy in a crucial moment.
Blaming Rielly here is blaming him for not pulling out some magic to save boneheaded plays by the forwards. The real issue is the boneheaded plays by the forwards. You want him to have a tight gap here ... that means him being up in the neutral zone during the Flames breakout, which is just
Ha ha ha ha ha
tonight’s game
rub·ber·neck
(rŭb′ər-nĕk′) Slang
intr.v. rub·ber·necked, rub·ber·neck·ing, rub·ber·necks
To look about or survey with unsophisticated wonderment or curiosity at a bad sight
For all those blaming Rielly for that OT goal, it was clearly, clearly just a terrible defensive effort by Matthews and Marner:
Garbage/useless gambling in the neutral zone, both forwards gambling on the puck carrier so unnecessarily. Then Matthews stops skating when, even after the bad gambling, he could have caught up with Gaudreau.
He was fine.How was Rittich in this one?
can he challenge Campbell for playing time or not really?
Yeah, agree to disagree I guess. I can see the argument for him being a touch higher there, before the forwards both gamble, but at the same time when both forwards are back and in good position playing it safe is very reasonable. The big issue is both forwards inexplicably gambling, then Matthews not even back-checking after screwing up - IMO Rielly's positioning before they gamble is at worst a very minor issue in comparison.He shouldn't be ontop of someone, but he needs to take back ice so he can match some speed and adjust as needed to play it properly . He's flat footed instead and too deep in his end. He can't charge the redline, but needs to come out to at least above the Blueline before retreating. I don't see him as in proper position for either a 2on2 or 2on1 because of it.
Last I'll say on it, because we won't agree, but I do understand the point you're trying to make about the other failures putting him in a tough spot.
I'd try Holl.Brodie is a pretty safe choice. You could also try out Holl or Sandin