In what sense? All I'm pointing out is that the Rangers, recently, have had two top 5 guys in their prime who are/were considered elite players and they didn't get it done. I didn't get into team building, draft comparisons, level of "eliteness", or anything else. There isn't any dishonesty in that.
And, I'm sure if I were to expend the time and energy, I could find a whole host of teams with two top 5 picks, either their own or traded for, that weren't successful.
It's easy to make an argument when teams win around a generational player (Crosby) who plays with another almost generational player (Malkin) or a Toews/Kane combo where one was taken 3rd overall and the other 1st within a close timeframe and both became as successful as they are in the NHL. The fact is that most top draft picks will never be a Crosby. That's why he's "generational".
Draft as best as you can. Make trades to make the team better. Hire the right coaching staff. That's the best you can do.