Former Ducks 2022

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ive been a fan of the Ring of Honor for a while. I think there are plenty of guys who would be good for the Ring that wouldnt necessarily rise to the level of having a number retired. Perry and Beauch are great guys for the Ring but not number retirement.
perry is 100% getting his number retired. zero doubt about that. only thing i'm curious about is if they'll wait until he retires to hang both his and getzlaf's numbers up on the same night

no need for a ring of honor really. aside from beauchemin, who else is there to include? jiggy should be getting his # retired, not put up in a ring of honor
 
  • Like
Reactions: FiveHoleTickler
perry is 100% getting his number retired. zero doubt about that. only thing i'm curious about is if they'll wait until he retires to hang both his and getzlaf's numbers up on the same night

no need for a ring of honor really. aside from beauchemin, who else is there to include? jiggy should be getting his # retired, not put up in a ring of honor

Guy Hebert, Steve Rucchin, Beauchemin, Salei, Troy Loney (First Captain), Perry (Hes not a retired # for me, but I know why he is to others). And then because I'm me, I also put Parros and Grimson in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: la patineuse
Guy Hebert, Steve Rucchin, Beauchemin, Salei, Troy Loney (First Captain), Perry (Hes not a retired # for me, but I know why he is to others). And then because I'm me, I also put Parros and Grimson in there.
salei is the only one worth honoring in any way. i'd unofficially retire his # but that's about it. just retire 15, 10, and 35 and all will be right
 
  • Like
Reactions: FiveHoleTickler
Eakins did an interview with The Athletic Hockey Show this week (starts around the 20 minute mark). In classic Eakins fashion, nothing but positivity when talking about the Ducks.

Thanks for posting this. Great interview. Couple things that stood out to me:

Eakins refers to his time with Murray at the helm as "a bit of a grey area" in terms of team direction (i.e. are we competing or rebuilding?) and once Verbeek came in the direction was clear. This really confirms what some of us have long speculated about with the direction (or lack thereof) of the team under Murray - at least during Eakins' tenure.

Eakins also recalls the reasoning behind moving Montour was because he'd cost too much money for us to keep him. It's been argued on here that the motive for the trade was initiating a rebuild. I never bought that argument and now I think it's pretty clear it doesn't hold any water.

Some stuff about Gibson that people will no doubt read too much into. Eakins views him like a son and says all he wants to do is win - win no matter what, got money on my mind, I can never get enough. Ok I added that last part.

Eakins thinks Z is wildly misunderstood. He says a lot of what Zegras is going through is what Terry went though and that he's confident Z will come out on the other side just like Terry has. Says he just needs his reps - "literally."
 
Perry I think is a lock for having his number retired and he deserves it. I believe he’s the only Duck to ever win a major individual award(not including the Smythe) and he’s one of the best RWs of his generation. It’s only maybe a question if he doesn’t get into the hall but I suspect that’s gonna happen too.

That’s part of the reason why it’s maybe a little tougher to retire 35. You’re already looking at 5 retired from the first 30 years with a nonzero chance there’s going to be more coming from this next era. Gotta draw a line somewhere.
Do people not consider the Richard as major?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Static
Thanks for posting this. Great interview. Couple things that stood out to me:

Eakins refers to his time with Murray at the helm as "a bit of a grey area" in terms of team direction (i.e. are we competing or rebuilding?) and once Verbeek came in the direction was clear. This really confirms what some of us have long speculated about with the direction (or lack thereof) of the team under Murray - at least during Eakins' tenure.

Eakins also recalls the reasoning behind moving Montour was because he'd cost too much money for us to keep him. It's been argued on here that the motive for the trade was initiating a rebuild. I never bought that argument and now I think it's pretty clear it doesn't hold any water.

Some stuff about Gibson that people will no doubt read too much into. Eakins views him like a son and says all he wants to do is win - win no matter what, got money on my mind, I can never get enough. Ok I added that last part.

Eakins thinks Z is wildly misunderstood. He says a lot of what Zegras is going through is what Terry went though and that he's confident Z will come out on the other side just like Terry has. Says he just needs his reps - "literally."

Verbeek did cite when he was hired that the next steps were to be contenders. Then we went full rebuild.

Monty had that arbitration thing that Murray doesn't like, apparently. Eakins wasn't the head coach of the Ducks when that happened. Eakins was the Gulls head coach. Eakins doesn't have the full story. Murray took over coaching duties 3/4ths through the 2018-19 season and made his decision.

As for "gray area", the rebuild was a slow rebuild compared to Verbeek blowing up the team. We didn't try adding top talent, but we were ushering the youth, as Eakins identified.

2018-19: Finished with 8th worst record. First time not in the playoffs. Added an extra 1st rd pick.
2019-20: Finished with 5th worst record. Added an extra 1st rd pick.
2020-21: Finished with 2nd worst record.
2021-22: Eakins said the Ducks were at the top of the Pacific when Verbeek got hired. We finished with the 10th worst record as Verbeek blew up the team at the TDL.
2022-23: Finished with the 2nd worst record.

The trajectory was an obvious rebuild since we weren't making hockey trades, but trades for picks & prospects and we weren't trying to sign high-end players during that time. 2021-22 was another development season, but so many good things happened at the same time: Terry finally blossomed, Zegras was an instant superstar, and everyone started off healthy. We still had no depth.

But hey, I guess going from Playoffs, to 8th worst record, to 5th worst record, and to 2nd worst record doesn't mean "rebuild" at all.
 
Thanks for posting this. Great interview. Couple things that stood out to me:

Eakins refers to his time with Murray at the helm as "a bit of a grey area" in terms of team direction (i.e. are we competing or rebuilding?) and once Verbeek came in the direction was clear. This really confirms what some of us have long speculated about with the direction (or lack thereof) of the team under Murray - at least during Eakins' tenure.

Eakins also recalls the reasoning behind moving Montour was because he'd cost too much money for us to keep him. It's been argued on here that the motive for the trade was initiating a rebuild. I never bought that argument and now I think it's pretty clear it doesn't hold any water.

Some stuff about Gibson that people will no doubt read too much into. Eakins views him like a son and says all he wants to do is win - win no matter what, got money on my mind, I can never get enough. Ok I added that last part.

Eakins thinks Z is wildly misunderstood. He says a lot of what Zegras is going through is what Terry went though and that he's confident Z will come out on the other side just like Terry has. Says he just needs his reps - "literally."
Really disappointing to hear about Montour. sounds like being 'tough to play with' wasn't the reason he was shipped out, and in a way, as frustrating as it would've been if that were the reason he was moved, money is even more annoying haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anaheim4ever
Really disappointing to hear about Montour. sounds like being 'tough to play with' wasn't the reason he was shipped out, and in a way, as frustrating as it would've been if that were the reason he was moved, money is even more annoying haha
He's going to get a pay day eventually with Florida or some other team.
I tend to think he's not a fluke because of the amount of minutes he's trusted to play by Maurice and how much energy he appears to have after playing 30 minutes lol. 73 points in 78 games on a team that barely snuck into the playoffs is pretty impressive. I think he does fall back down a bit but will be a 55+ point guy going forward. Theodore still paces for 50+ points but he's even worse defensively than Montour and softer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Rogers
Having the Ducks start the series against the Preds like less than 48 hours after the end of that grueling series vs Oilers was robbery from the league.

Rinne was good but always felt he was overrated, he just played like superman against the Ducks and even then I’m not sure he was why we kept losing to them.
 
rinne was a great goaltender but he always turned into prime hasek against the ducks. my biggest what if from 2017 is perry. that was the first season of his decline and if i remember correctly, he only scored 4 goals that entire playoffs. if he was on his game, good chance they would have beaten nashville

i think 2015 was a far bigger missed opportunity than 2017. don't have any doubt they would have beaten TB if they had gotten past chicago
 
Guy Hebert, Steve Rucchin, Beauchemin, Salei, Troy Loney (First Captain), Perry (Hes not a retired # for me, but I know why he is to others). And then because I'm me, I also put Parros and Grimson in there.
We can hang Parros' 16 jersey in one of the 400s level men's rooms. Dude has shown zero loyalty to this team since he left, broadvasting for the Kings during their bandwagon years, ending Cogs' iron man streak, not punishing several players who crossed the line against the Ducks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anaheim4ever
Having the Ducks start the series against the Preds like less than 48 hours after the end of that grueling series vs Oilers was robbery from the league.

Rinne was good but always felt he was overrated, he just played like superman against the Ducks and even then I’m not sure he was why we kept losing to them.
I'm not privy to the logistical reasoning, but this looks far worse now when you consider the Panthers just had like 10 days off before their next series. Sure, the sweep helps but, hell, Vegas won in 6 and still got 4 days of rest before the Final.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Rogers
We can hang Parros' 16 jersey in one of the 400s level men's rooms. Dude has shown zero loyalty to this team since he left, broadvasting for the Kings during their bandwagon years, ending Cogs' iron man streak, not punishing several players who crossed the line against the Ducks.
Wow I didn't know about that. Definitely put Parros in the hall of shame for sure.
 
1686305053615.png


Congrats to Monty and his family.
 
Eakins did an interview with The Athletic Hockey Show this week (starts around the 20 minute mark). In classic Eakins fashion, nothing but positivity when talking about the Ducks.

Man oh man, when you hear Dallas - great guy overall - talking about Monty, I really do not understand. If it was "just" money what would have it been back then. I think a 5x4.5 was not so far off. I still often think about how a Lindholm - Monty pair could have been. Nevertheless, it took him some time to figure it out. Interestingly Dallas mentioned Cam as the 3rd guy :-)

Is there another Monty guy around?
 
rinne was a great goaltender but he always turned into prime hasek against the ducks. my biggest what if from 2017 is perry. that was the first season of his decline and if i remember correctly, he only scored 4 goals that entire playoffs. if he was on his game, good chance they would have beaten nashville

i think 2015 was a far bigger missed opportunity than 2017. don't have any doubt they would have beaten TB if they had gotten past chicago
2015, I recall the tide seemed to turn in the third period of game 5 in Anaheim. Ducks up 3-0 then Anderson gives up a weak goal and the hawks pop 2 more to tie the game when Freddy was strong All series. Then, ducks win in OT but damage was done as the hawks regained their confidence and won the next 2 handily I think.

2017, Preds lost Johansen late in the series. I recalll the close out game the ducks were down a man late and let the preds rag the puck for half the PP with time running out in the game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad