Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
He MAKES 4.5 mil. Try again.
Look at his money owed, aka his salary.
Not his SB
Not his AAV
He MAKES 4.5 mil. Try again.
True. Only a contender should be interested in him as a 3c and they should mainly care about fitting him under the cap. I was thinking he had 1 year left though. For 2 years salary and cap will be relevant.Look at his money owed, aka his salary.
Not his SB
Not his AAV
The point was that you called him a 40 point player when he’s never actually achieved 40 points.Thanks for proving my point.
He’s negative value. How negative? No idea. But he’s not even worth a 7th rounder. .How much do fans from other fan bases feel Dvorak is worth via trade?
For what Dvorak brings, his AAV is not reasonable at all. *maybe* if the Habs ate half of his contract, but at a hit of 4.45, that’s not a guy teams will line up for.I think whenever JT Compher signs what will seem like overpayment for too many seasons, a 2 year commitment at reasonable AAV will be far more attractive to some.
Basically a slightly above replacement level player making 4 milAt best, someone would buy in on Dvorak's age and take him for next to nothing. More realistically, his value is probably negative.
His issue is that he's not good enough offensively to be an offensive 2C but not good enough defensively to be a defensive 3C. He's a decent 2-way center, but he's just not good enough at either end of the ice to actually fill a role that his ability would fit in. Combine that with his pretty hefty salary for what he provides and it's not a very valuable asset.
40 pts two-way center who's good on faceoffs making 4M a year = trash
Well, once Compher has signed, I think Dvorak won't seem too bad. Likely too steep for what he brings to a contender constantly up against the cap, but some mid-level team will prefer 2x4.5 with Dvorak to 5x5 for Compher.For what Dvorak brings, his AAV is not reasonable at all. *maybe* if the Habs ate half of his contract, but at a hit of 4.45, that’s not a guy teams will line up for.
There’s a difference between simply signing a guy to a contract and having to give up Habs fans valuation of a player. Compher at 5 has zero acquisition cost, and a Cup ring and a 50 point season under his belt. Dvorak might get those things, but their value is not close until he does.Well, once Compher has signed, I think Dvorak won't seem too bad. Likely too steep for what he brings to a contender constantly up against the cap, but some mid-level team will prefer 2x4.5 with Dvorak to 5x5 for Compher.
Negative asset.How much do fans from other fan bases feel Dvorak is worth via trade?
Right its us not you. Hahaha a second...He's a solid 3C who will put up 15 goals and 30-40 points. People saying negative value are off their rocker. It's not a lot of value but it isn't negative (I'm a Habs fan, but I'd guess he's worth a second)
When was he a 40 point two way center?... He's never scored 40 points in a single season in his career. Slow, over paid 3rd line center. At best returns a similar type player. It won't cost much to unload him but no one is giving anything of value right now. Maybe next year at the deadline when he is about to be a UFA and Montreal retains.40 pts two-way center who's good on faceoffs making 4M a year = trash
I guess you don't understand what semantics means or how to spell it.He's litterally been on pace for 40+ pts in 3 of his last 4 seasons.
But I guess you want to argue sementics, just as about everytime I read anything on here. This board is a shithole.
The ironyI know you're from Texas, but COVID was real and happened. I guess it's Dvorak's fault if the NHL cut 2 seasons short and he couldn't play more game to reach that precious treshold of yours.
Anyway, this debate is boring me. You're all so predictable.
"Two-way Center"
He's litterally been on pace for 40+ pts in 3 of his last 4 seasons.
But I guess you want to argue sementics, just as about everytime I read anything on here. This board is a shithole.
Letting Danault walk.