CokenoPepsi
Registered User
- Oct 28, 2016
- 5,359
- 2,729
Are you talking about the Grizzle truth?It will be more like the Showtime documentary about the Vancouver Grizzlies.
Are you talking about the Grizzle truth?It will be more like the Showtime documentary about the Vancouver Grizzlies.
Are you talking about the Grizzle truth?
Balsillie's offer was $212.5 million. Reinsdorf's was like $148 million. That's not revision. Those are just numbers.Fine.... you stick with that little revision of history and I'll stick to the facts.
If he ended up getting the team... YIKES.. considering blackberry/RIM is pretty much dead.Balsillie's offer was $212.5 million. Reinsdorf's was like $148 million. That's not revision. Those are just numbers.
That didn't age well Jimmy!RIM co-CEO Jim Balsillie created a bit of a ruckus on the Web at the Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco last Tuesday, when he downplayed the importance of apps in the mobile user experience. "You don't have [to] make the Web an app," he said, and "I don't need a YouTube app to go to YouTube". There actually is a YouTube app for BlackBerry, but frankly, there is not a lot more to be found at BlackBerry App World. RIM does have over 10,000 apps available, but many are priced at a level that most would consider an "investment" rather than a "novelty".
I'd be fascinated to peak into the world where he bought the team, and then the collapse happened.If he ended up getting the team... YIKES.. considering blackberry/RIM is pretty much dead.
By "other teams", I assume you mean Edmonton & Calgary? I don't know enough about their situations to comment. I'm not seeing how your point relates to the Coyotes & what their entire history has shown. Even a brand new arena where they control all the revenue still isn't enough to make it work without it the entertainment district attached. Full stop. That was the only point I was making. Forget about being profitable, they have proven they lose between $10 & 30M annually. So the only other way forward without relocation is selling them to Ishibia & moving them back in with the Suns.That's non-sense. Literally EVERYONE building new arena/stadiums are trying to do this, simply because it's more revenue. The development rights to the area surrounding the stadium/arena are coveted, because tens of thousands of people are trafficking the area and it's a much higher ROI than an arena.
The two parties negotiating/dividing costs for the arena/stadium are both trying to spend as little as possible, and keep as much revenue as possible.
If an NHL owner builds a $900m area himself, and makes $30m in profit running a hockey team... he's broken even after 30 years, at which point he needs a new arena. This is why teams don't just build their own.
If a city gives a $900m arena to an owner for free, they're out $900m.
Making it a "mixed used" development project brings in outside revenue streams besides the team and city.
The NHL owner and city split the cost of the $900m arena and the owner pays off his part of the arena from being the landlord of the entertainment district, the city pays off their part of the arena by collecting the taxes from the entertainment district. The hockey team has the revenues to be successful because they're not paying off the arena the whole time, and the city is creating revenue out of what was nothing.
The business are fronting the cost, which they can afford to do because the arena is handing them tens of thousands in customer traffic. It's win-win-win.
If he ended up getting the team... YIKES.. considering blackberry/RIM is pretty much dead.
That didn't age well Jimmy!
Actually, the thing is...he was on to something but he was missing the forest for the trees, and using YouTube as the e.g. was literally the worst e.g. he could have picked.That didn't age well Jimmy!
By "other teams", I assume you mean Edmonton & Calgary? I don't know enough about their situations to comment. I'm not seeing how your point relates to the Coyotes & what their entire history has shown. Even a brand new arena where they control all the revenue still isn't enough to make it work without it the entertainment district attached. Full stop. That was the only point I was making. Forget about being profitable, they have proven they lose between $10 & 30M annually. So the only other way forward without relocation is selling them to Ishibia & moving them back in with the Suns.
What you're saying makes total sense, however, the Braves & the Wings are terrible comparisons. Those are two extremely well run teams that have storied histories, winning pedigrees and large, healthy fanbases. Detroit needed a new building, where the Braves did not.My post had nothing to do with the Coyotes. You're combining two things that exist in the world of sports business into one faulty premise.
Owners and cities going to a "Mixed Use" Entertainment District around the arena just makes arena deals better for everyone and more likely to succeed. It's the next logical step from what we saw in the 1990s...
Remember when EVERYONE was talking about building sports venues Downtown to spark urban renewal?
The idea being that the stadium would bring tens of thousands of people, so businesses would want to operate there to cater to that traffic: bars and nightlife, restaurants, shops, etc, which would restore/renew that area of downtown into a thriving area.
The results were hit or miss is because the city was just HOPING it happened: That OTHER entrepreneurs would see the opportunity for dollar signs, invest and profit.
If you're the city, you WANT that to happen so including that in the team stadium deal to guarantees that it does happen is a huge win. And the team owners saw where it did happen successfully, and thought "It's OUR customer traffic. WE brought this revenue here... why is that money being made by SOMEONE ELSE?"
So My objection to your post was that owners are gunning for the development rights because it's smart business, NOT because they "need it or the team would fail."
It's merely extending the principles of revenue generation INSIDE the stadium to the property SURROUNDING the stadium.
The Atlanta Braves, Detroit Red Wings immediately spring to mind as two teams who did this who certainly weren't running the risk of going out of business without it.
Again I fail to see what this has to do with my statement about the COYOTES needing the TED to survive. Because that's who I was specifically referring to. Somehow you took that I was implying that any sports & entertainment district is a bad idea in every market for every sport.And of course, it really all started with AEG's Staples Center and LA Live.
AEG did it because there was huge money to be made doing it, not because the Lakers, Clippers or Kings needed it to survive.
I'd be fascinated to peak into the world where he bought the team, and then the collapse happened.
In this world does he successfully move the team to Hamilton or are they still in Arizona?I'd be fascinated to peak into the world where he bought the team, and then the collapse happened.
War and Peace would be a prologue compared to what the Coyotes book will be when completed.Someone from here was going to write a book, but I think got scared off after it reached War and Peace in size.
AFTER he got the BK rolling.Balsillie's offer was $212.5 million. Reinsdorf's was like $148 million. That's not revision. Those are just numbers.
To be fair, Steve Ballmer said similar things when the iPhone came out.If he ended up getting the team... YIKES.. considering blackberry/RIM is pretty much dead.
That didn't age well Jimmy!
Days of Our CoyotesClearly it's not a 30 for 30, it's a mini-series. Honestly if you want to trace it back to Winnipeg and the WHA-to-NHL transfer chicanery, you'd have a full fledged television show that would go for several seasons.
The app thing still doesn't make any sense. it's a trend-gimmick and the primary reason companies push it is so they can collect your private data, without you realizing it.If he ended up getting the team... YIKES.. considering blackberry/RIM is pretty much dead.
That didn't age well Jimmy!
My understanding is a much better arena location and a much much higher of fandom growth.I don't think it would be much different from Eugene Melnyk to be honest. - his other investments dried up so he was only left with the hockey team - but the hockey team then exploded in value.
Is anyone else confused by @Lady Stanley vs @LadyStanley?
I'd be fascinated to peak into the world where he bought the team, and then the collapse happened.
QC's only an easier market to predict if you can predict the future CAD-USD exchange rate. That, and the relatively small corporate base in Quebec, killed the team once, and can do so again.I want the Nordiques back but would also be okay with Houston, SLC or even Hartford for old times sake. The problem with those US cities though, is the same problem faced by Arizona. How do you attract and retain a market.
QC would be an easier market to predict. Although a smaller market, it would be a die hard market.