Benstheman
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2014
- 7,985
- 4,441
Thanks.Don't think the Bruins would be too keen on trading him. He can play on any line, any position, has chemistry with Pasta... Definitely a down year compared to the last 2 years for him (like pretty much everyone on the team) but don't think they'd want to sell low.
Obviously doubt he's untouchable but I would think the offer would need to be above his value.
Whether it's the right thing to do or not (I'm not sure), don't think there's any indication they're going to completely blow it up and rebuild. Think they traded the guys that wouldn't be here past next season and intend to spend money and fill out the roster, hoping the guys who had a down year rebound and for us to stay healthy next year.Thanks.
Where do you think Boston goes from here?? rebuild or retool?
Agreed. You guys still have a good no.1 D, a solid starting goalie and a top 10 forward in the league. Though to rebuild with those players.Whether it's the right thing to do or not (I'm not sure), don't think there's any indication they're going to completely blow it up and rebuild. Think they traded the guys that wouldn't be here past next season and intend to spend money and fill out the roster, hoping the guys who had a down year rebound and for us to stay healthy next year.
Could also be completely blown up at the draft but I don't see that happening with our ownership and/or if Sweeney stays.
I would give Calgary's 1st and a prospect (Mailloux as D or Kapanen as C). Both prospect are set to make NHL next season imo.Unless the Bruins are getting a 1st+ I would just hang onto him.
I’d do Kapanen and the Calgary 1st.I would give Calgary's 1st and a prospect (Mailloux as D or Kapanen as C). Both prospect are set to make NHL next season imo.