Connor Bedard stats good... but...

SwedishFire

Registered User
Mar 3, 2011
5,433
1,905
He’s listed at 5’10” and 185lb which is absolutely fine for the nhl. On top of that, he could potentially grow another inch or two and put on 10+ lbs in the next couple of years.
His weigth is not a concern, it will come with the years, And if to heavy he skates worse. He looks sooo small .He cant be 5"10, must be 5"9. Or is all other players just taller?
Can he grow to 6"0, it would be great for him.
 
Last edited:

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
46,433
44,931
Caverns of Draconis
Completly diffrent personalities.
Nugent Hopkins was also compared to Sakic, although a good comparision

A good compare is hybrid of a small Ovie and Drouin.

And also remember that Drouin looked great at jwc, i see some of Drouin in the sense that Bedard seems to practice same elements all the time in his game. Well see how it fares.

NHL and junior is very diffrent things.

This guy just compared Bedard to Drouin.


Holy shit this thread
 
  • Love
Reactions: SwedishFire

Gold Standard

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
2,385
2,285
Best WJC performance by any player that I have ever seen. And I've seen them all since 1986.

Here endeth the lesson!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ciao

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,250
16,425
Yeah how dare I critique a player and predict how I FEEL he’ll turn out.

I should be instead claiming whoever drafts him gets a cup immediately and he scores 80 goals as a rookie. Some of you have lost it. It’s funny to see how mad people are because I compared him to a hall of famer with a similar style.

I don’t see Gretzky or Lemieux in him. I see Patrick Kane. It’s crazy that is such a controversial opinion apparently.
Bro… you’re one the one who compares him to Eberle.

I simply showed how ridiculous of a comparison that was.

If you don’t want answers like that, don’t make those kinds of comparisons.

It’s like saying Connor McDavid “only had 99pts” while Connor Brown had 120+pts in the same league in 2014 so maybe he won’t be the next Crosby

It lacks zero context which would have thrown that out the window.

If you want to say he might not be the next McDavid then sure. You’re going to need much better reasons than “he’s small” and “Eberle only did a bit worse than him”
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,504
6,226
Visit site
Physicality-wise, he looks more like a Kane/Crosby hybrid than a Kane/St. Louis/Gaudreau type player. I don't see an "excels despite his size" element here.
 

Leafshater67

Registered User
Nov 2, 2019
1,707
2,652
Halifax
Bro… you’re one the one who compares him to Eberle.

I simply showed how ridiculous of a comparison that was.

If you don’t want answers like that, don’t make those kinds of comparisons.

It’s like saying Connor McDavid “only had 99pts” while Connor Brown had 120+pts in the same league in 2014 so maybe he won’t be the next Crosby

It lacks zero context which would have thrown that out the window.

If you want to say he might not be the next McDavid then sure. You’re going to need much better reasons than “he’s small” and “Eberle only did a bit worse than him”
I’m just pushing back against the insane narrative that he’s a lock to become the next Wayne Gretzky with some reality based logic. There’s no doubt he’ll be gold but some on here believe he will be the second coming of Jesus and cure cancer then go hysterical when somebody shares their opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EpiPen

jellybeans

Registered User
Nov 9, 2007
1,351
1,138
Gretzky was 170 lbs soaking wet most of his life and from what I hear had a pretty good career.
It helped a bit having Semenko ready to kill anyone who would touch Gretzky.

I think Bedard will be the best player since super Mario.
 

kevsh

Registered User
Nov 28, 2018
3,635
5,103
From what I've seen Bedard is going to be at worst a franchise talent. The skill, the vision, not lightning speed but that's not a prerequisite for greatness. And for a smaller guy he is not afraid to go to the tough areas, even plays with a bit of an edge too at times. The work ethic is clearly there, and that shot? He'll be fine.

And although I don't think he's going to be a 90+ player in his rookie year, for which fans will immediately cast doubt on his generational status, give him a couple of seasons to mature physically and ideally whatever terrible team drafts him the opportunity to surround him with a few good players and he's going to light it up.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,504
6,226
Visit site
I’m just pushing back against the insane narrative that he’s a lock to become the next Wayne Gretzky with some reality based logic. There’s no doubt he’ll be gold but some on here believe he will be the second coming of Jesus and cure cancer then go hysterical when somebody shares their opinion.

No, you aren't. You got called out on making a questionable comparison to Eberle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevsh and bert

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
He’s incredible but this is the world juniors, not the NHL. Eberle looked like a lock to be an elite point producer during his run too. His size will hurt him. He also tries to do too much and has looked bad in his own end or on turnovers.
Eberle was 18 and 19. He also had some big seasons. Bedard is blowing it away at 17. Goes to the dirty zones and has insane vision. Bad take. Really bad actually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevsh

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
It’s not the total thing but if Patrick Kane or Mitch Marner were 6’2, 220, would they be on another level as players? Probably, yes.

I don’t think he’s going to reach a MacDavid or Lemieux level that some on here are thinking.

I feel he’s much more likely a 100 point guy than a 150 point guy like MacDavid. You know the hyperbole is out of control when guys jump on me for comparing him to a guy who’s a lock for the hall of fame.
You compared him to Eberle. Wtf are you talking about lol..
Next Marner output wise not style wise.
He's so much better than Marner at the same age it's not remotely close. He is also a way harder player with a way better shot. What is going on in this thread? People are new to this sport or something? 17 year Olds don't do.this. it never happens. Literally. Not like the eye test isn't backing it up either.

Why so butthurt.
It's the most appropriate response to an asinine thread.
 

bert

Registered User
Nov 11, 2002
37,576
23,895
Visit site
I’m just pushing back against the insane narrative that he’s a lock to become the next Wayne Gretzky with some reality based logic. There’s no doubt he’ll be gold but some on here believe he will be the second coming of Jesus and cure cancer then go hysterical when somebody shares their opinion.
Thats not what happened in this thread at all actually. Everyone can read the original post.........
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,845
26,781
Five Hills
Lindros rocked. He was never a generational player.

For reference these are my generational skaters since expansion..

Orr
Gretzky
Lemieux
Crosby
Ovechkin
McDavid



Probably watched more Jagr than a lot of people on here..

I never saw a time period as a Penguins fan where Jagr was "the best skater" in the league bar none for a period of 4-5 years.

The above are the only players I think fall in that category.

I'd buy an argument on Lidstrom in there as well, but much like Jagr I think it was more a career thing.

Lindros was considered on that level at the time in 91. His career was absolutely derailed by injuries and he just never became the player that he was expected to be. His nickname back in his early days was "The Next One".

The comparisons were lofty and he lived up to the billing early on as a PPG+ player but a series of concussions basically ruined any chance he had of continuing to be as dominant as he was. In hindsight it's easy to say that he wasn't but in reality all the signs were there and he has absolutely dominant for a short period of time.

You're right though Jagr was never generational. He was a really good player who played in a league that suffered through a bit of a talent drop through the late 90's/early 2000's. That era was extremely physical and featured a lot of clutch and grab. Some players that should have and could have done great things had their careers cut short or were constantly fighting something and the general thought was to just play through it. Guys like Lindros, Bure and Forsberg had trouble staying healthy and Lemieux had his battles with cancer and injuries. Which really allowed Jagr who was an absolute horse and managed to stay relatively healthy to dominate the scoring race for a period of time that I don't think he otherwise would have. A great player for sure but I think he's more in the tier of guys like Mikita, Lafluer and Beliveau than he is in the tier of guys like like Gretz and Orr.
 

BigBadBoar

Registered User
Dec 20, 2017
1,476
1,363
Pardubice
His size would be limiting him more in the 90s or early 2000s. Now he has a great chance to become a generational superstar. I don't dare to say he will be as great or even greater as McDavid, but I am pretty sure he is going to become a superstar player if he stays healthy etc.
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
39,845
26,781
Five Hills
I’m just pushing back against the insane narrative that he’s a lock to become the next Wayne Gretzky with some reality based logic. There’s no doubt he’ll be gold but some on here believe he will be the second coming of Jesus and cure cancer then go hysterical when somebody shares their opinion.

Anyone comparing him to Gretzky is out to lunch. That comparison is far to lofty for anyone to ever live up to and really can't be used for any prospect ever,

But I think it's fair to look at what he's doing in the WHL and his international career and see a player that is doing things that are truly special and haven't really been done before in that case.

He's currently on pace to have the 2nd best scoring season by an U18 player in the WHL ever. The 1st, 3rd, 4th and 5th best seasons are all from the early 90's or earlier during a time when scoring in the WHL was much higher. He's shattering records at the WJC while doing it and his ability to elevate his game on a massive stage is incredibly obvious at this point.

Is he generational? Maybe. Is it fair to think he might be? Absolutely. The rest now is up to him to prove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silky Johnson

Confucius

There is no try, Just do
Feb 8, 2009
23,306
7,894
Toronto
He’s incredible but this is the world juniors, not the NHL. Eberle looked like a lock to be an elite point producer during his run too. His size will hurt him. He also tries to do too much and has looked bad in his own end or on turnovers.
The big difference is Eberle was drafted in 2008, he played in the WJC in 2009, 2010. Bedard isn’t even draft eligible yet. Bedard will be generational.
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,280
24,522
You compared him to Eberle. Wtf are you talking about lol..

He's so much better than Marner at the same age it's not remotely close. He is also a way harder player with a way better shot. What is going on in this thread? People are new to this sport or something? 17 year Olds don't do.this. it never happens. Literally. Not like the eye test isn't backing it up either.


It's the most appropriate response to an asinine thread.
Marner is a .ppg player. That's all I was going for. .ppg rookie seasons as 18 year olds are not that common. I can name more guys that isn't do it then I can that did... Some 18 year olds that weren't .ppg ... Jagr, how Thornton, Lafreniere, draisaitl, Pastrnak. No, not new to the game.lol. Forsberg was in Sweden as an 18 year old.
 

Ciao

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2010
10,219
6,069
Toronto
Connor Bedard is a good player but do the stats even matter ?
He's a pretty small guy, do you think he will excel in the NHL ?

I'm just comparing him to guys like Jordan Eberle or other players records he has beaten this tournament.
Good feat but the players records he broke aren't the best in the NHL, good but not the best.

Link here shows every record he has broken:

Great player but will he be able to compete with his size ? Seem like a small guy and might get run over a lot. Just my take. :)
Funny, but that's exactly how I felt about Wayne Gretzky at the 1978 WJC. Nice little 16 y.o. player, but there's not much meat on those bones, and let's see what happens when he plays against real men like Phil Esposito and Larry Robinson?
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad