arttk
Registered User
Jim Benning would pay that for MyersSorry, Jim Benning got fired.
Jim Benning would pay that for MyersSorry, Jim Benning got fired.
No way Petry waives for Vancouver. He was traded out of Montreal because he wanted to go back to the USA.
Btw, my solution for a right-handed PK center is: Offer sheet Rasmus Kupari at $2.1M this summer.
Either we get a 21 year old forward who is already able to win faceoffs and kill penalties at the NHL level and may still have some offensive upside, with the only compensation being a 3rd round pick in 2024.
Or we force a capped out LA team we're potentially competing for a playoff spot with to waste even more money.
-some have speculated the Penguins offered two first round picks and he's heard that as well but hasn't verified it
-doesn't think it was a firm offer but the teams had multiple conversations
-talked on Thursday and Friday about a trade
-Canucks were involved in some of the brokering of moving a Pittsburgh player to a third team; was a requirement to make the trade work
-not sure how the Canucks would get a centre in return; speculates there may have been another team as part of the process
-the player the Penguins wanted to move "wasn't any of the big boys" but was a veteran player who was being shopped to, at least, two different teams
-believes that the Hurricanes and another Western Conference team could have been involved (not clear if this is direction connection to the Penguins talks or another trade scenario)
-says he doesn't think the Canucks are happy that these talks got leaked (heavily implying all this info came from the Penguins)
-there's a lot more pressure on Hextall and the Penguins; the new ownership is very invested
-wasn't much talk with the Penguins about Boeser
Do the Canucks look to trade their first+ for PLD? You would have to get some kind of contract done or at least have some kind of assurance you could get a deal done. If the Canucks could move Miller it would make sense money-wise. Assuming they don't take on a lot of money coming back in the Miller trade.
I think people need to get over the Miller trade fantasy. They had their chances during two TDL's and an entire off-season, the odds they get it done between now and when his NTC kicks in this July are slim as f***.Do the Canucks look to trade their first+ for PLD? You would have to get some kind of contract done or at least have some kind of assurance you could get a deal done. If the Canucks could move Miller it would make sense money-wise. Assuming they don't take on a lot of money coming back in the Miller trade.
I think people need to get over the Miller trade fantasy. They had their chances during two TDL's and an entire off-season, the odds they get it done between now and when his NTC kicks in this July are slim as f***.
It's fantasy because moving out a contract that significant is extremely difficult in a league where most teams are in cap hell, including the Canucks themselves, and the Canucks themselves are in a win-now mode. Those parameters make a trade pretty unlikely. This has been echoed by pretty much every insider when asked about a potential Miller trade.How is it a fantasy when they literally had talks this deadline to trade Miller?
Are you sure you're not the one living in fantasy right now?
It's fantasy because moving out a contract that significant is extremely difficult in a league where most teams are in cap hell, including the Canucks themselves, and the Canucks themselves are in a win-now mode. Those parameters make a trade pretty unlikely. This has been echoed by pretty much every insider when asked about a potential Miller trade.
When's the last time a player with that much money still owed on his contract got traded? Especially one at Miller's age?
They haven’t been able to do it after 2 TDL’s and an entire off-season, I’m guessing the odds of them being able to do it before his NTC kicks in is slim. It’s likely a combination of his contract size, age, and the Canucks valuation of him vs the league’s, plus again the Canucks themselves being in cap hell while wanting to win asap with multiple roster holes to fillSeth Jones?
Bo Horvat? Hampus Lindholm? Jonathan Huberdeau? Matthew Tkachuk? Mackenzie Weever? Kevin Fiala? Not exactly the same but they signed a big extension right after being acquired (basically equivalent as your argument is that big contracts can't be moved).
There's literally more movement than ever before in NHL history when it comes to trades. A JT Miller trade is certainly feasible - we just need to take some money back.
How does it make sense that you're telling other people that trading JT Miller is completely fantasy land when they LITERALLY had multiple discussions/frameworks about a JT Miller deal literally a week ago???
They haven’t been able to do it after 2 TDL’s and an entire off-season, I’m guessing the odds of them being able to do it before his NTC kicks in is slim. It’s likely a combination of his contract size, age, and the Canucks valuation of him vs the league’s, plus again the Canucks themselves being in cap hell while wanting to win asap with multiple roster holes to fill
If you believe the rumours, the deal with the Rags last TDL never happened because the Canucks didn’t feel like they were offered enough(valuation difference hurdle). And the rumours out there about why the deal didn’t happen this TDL was either because the Canucks weren’t willing to take on a cap dump that extended past this season(cap hell hurdle) and that the Canucks wanted a Center to replace Miller that fits into the 20-25 age gap they’re targeting(so the win now and age gap hurdle).
I’m not saying they won’t discuss deals, I’m saying that the odds of them finding a deal that works for both teams involved are slim. They need a very specific type of return.
So again, the Canucks need a lot of things to line up to pull the trigger. Hence, slim odds. It’s not easy to make a lot of things line up in the nhl. Either you bite the bullet and pull the trigger which they clearly prefer not to do, or you you holdMiller instead which they seem to be fine withThe last TDL, the thinking was that they could hold on and find a trade in the offseason for equivalent or better value. This made some sense... more suitors... more cap space and the ability to discuss an extension.
They assumed they would get an extension done with Horvat so they could pivot to trading Miller. For whatever reason, Horvat couldn't nail down an extension with the team, so JR/Allvin pivoted to sign Miller instead. Horvat ends up pricing himself out of Vancouver and the year completely spirals out of control. Now, a JTM trade does make sense if the return is appropriate.
There were several reports that the Miller to Pittsburgh deal can still be done in the offseason. Vancouver just needs to find a young centre to target.
It's really not fantasy land because multiple reports have indicated that there were significant talks. It could be a case that the Canucks targeted someone who's on a playoff team, but they don't want to give them up (KK for example).
Offer sheets are a lose-lose prisoner’s dilemma. You nearly always guarantee a retaliatory offer sheet from the same team the next time you are in an RFA bind. You might get Kupari, but you’ll lose Podkolzin. Or maybe worst of all, match an offer sheet equivalent to the Kotkaniemi contract.Btw, my solution for a right-handed PK center is: Offer sheet Rasmus Kupari at $2.1M this summer.
Either we get a 21 year old forward who is already able to win faceoffs and kill penalties at the NHL level and may still have some offensive upside, with the only compensation being a 3rd round pick in 2024.
Or we force a capped out LA team we're potentially competing for a playoff spot with to waste even more money.
Amen! I’ve been waiting for horrific contracts to expire ever since we signed Loui Eriksson. If we can get out of those two deals then we can finally start to move forward with a relatively clean slate. Boeser is overpaid but not to that level and likely also gets moved.First priority for me this off season is buying out OEL. The fact that he’s been replaced and outperformed by a number of farmhands joining the lineup should be the death knell there. It’ll hurt for a couple of years in particular, but still save us in terms of cap, and not trotting him out there each night.
That, and trading Myers should clear the slate for new bodies to take their place.
I would rather trade him at 50% retained. I think someone would take him on a deal that's 4 years @ $3,630,000.First priority for me this off season is buying out OEL. The fact that he’s been replaced and outperformed by a number of farmhands joining the lineup should be the death knell there. It’ll hurt for a couple of years in particular, but still save us in terms of cap, and not trotting him out there each night.
That, and trading Myers should clear the slate for new bodies to take their place.
First priority for me this off season is buying out OEL. The fact that he’s been replaced and outperformed by a number of farmhands joining the lineup should be the death knell there. It’ll hurt for a couple of years in particular, but still save us in terms of cap, and not trotting him out there each night.
That, and trading Myers should clear the slate for new bodies to take their place.