$10m only due to the players age, as he can be bought at at 1/3 instead of 2/3, and the cap hit would be $8.8m spread over 12 years, so less than $1m/year cap hit.As a Hab fan who was arguing that KK was extremely overrated for over a year before he left, this is extremely satisfying.
Of I'm counting correctly with the buyout KK will have cost them 25.7 million $ plus first and third round picks for three years of mediocre play. That is exactly the same cost per year as the original Aho offer sheet which their owner was so mad about.
Couldn't have happened to a better bunch of jerks.
Not the canes it wouldn’tI've thought for a while that something around KK + picks/prospects for Kadri could benefit both sides
I believe the poster is saying the buyout of 10 million plus a season of 6.185 and 2 seasons of 4.85 = 25 some million and a 1st and a 3rd.$10m only due to the players age, as he can be bought at at 1/3 instead of 2/3, and the cap hit would be $8.8m spread over 12 years, so less than $1m/year cap hit.
10.2 for the buyout + 1 year at 4.5 + 1 year at 4.0 + 1 year at 6.1 = 24.8M for 3 years of play...$10m only due to the players age, as he can be bought at at 1/3 instead of 2/3, and the cap hit would be $8.8m spread over 12 years, so less than $1m/year cap hit.
u can have Campbell for him.And if Pittsburgh then buys out Kotkaniemi there's a retained salary slot on the books for twice as long. See Arizona with OEL: Vancouver's buyout takes up a retained salary slot for Arizona, not a buyout slot.
Carolina's much more likely to use retained salary slots in the future than buyouts. So if they can't unload Kotkaniemi without retaining salary, they're likely to buy him out directly rather than retain salary.
A contract swap is also more likely than retained salary: send Kotkaniemi for a shorter-term similar cap hit. The other team could try him out before deciding on a buyout or just buy him out, while Carolina takes the cap hit for the next year or two.
Would a team that doesn't spend to the cap be willing to do the buyout for them? Get a pick out of it?
I think the canes have almost no choice. They have to buy him out, or pay someone else assets to do it for them. He's going to be a massive anchor if they wait longer and miss the 1/3 cost window.
Obviously False... No one would want Kotkaniemi...
That's the least surprising news of all time.
The 1/3 cost window is for players under the age of 26. KK is 23. They have time
No interest in MikheyevNecas and Kotkaniemi for Hronek and Mikheyev.
I don’t see any way Vancouver would take on KK without moving out Mikheyev. Just my opinion.No interest in Mikheyev
Probably but I think that would need to be a different deal.I don’t see any way Vancouver would take on KK without moving out Mikheyev. Just my opinion.
You can “fit” the roster but not fit the cap.So here's the thing
6 years left at 4.82
He's overpaid this season by 2m
So you overpay a player by 2.0 m for 6 years vs having 800k on the books for 12.
The only reason you buy him out is if he doesn't fit on your roster.
Strengths include his accurate impression of bambi on ice.What are this players strengths exactly?
They’d rather ask for a first.Would Canes give up their first for team to take KK contract?
Why would they when his buyout is stupid cheap?Would Canes give up their first for team to take KK contract?
No. The sweetener to take Kotkaniemi will not be that large, if we need one at all.Would Canes give up their first for team to take KK contract?