Ive seen some people online float the idea of cycling the Winter Olympics through Vancouver, SLC and two European/Asian cities. Its not terrible, it would be in places where they have the facilities/infrastructure which are also countries that are big on winter sports.
Well, things get old and outdated. I don't see anything "wrong" with what Salt Lake is doing...
SLC built venues systematically through the decade while bidding on the 1998 and 2002 Olympics. Now they're looking to do it again.
The important thing is to have actual uses for what you build beyond just the Olympics. Which SLC did great at last time:
Salt Lake Ice Center > aka Vivint Arena for Utah Jazz
Maverik Center > Utah Grizzlies
Peaks Ice Arena > Utah Valley University, BYU club, USPHL hockey.
Ice Sheet at Ogden > Weber St hockey, USPHL tema, junior hockey
Olympic Oval > US Speedskating HQ
Salt Palace > New Convention Center
Olympic Village > University of Utah dorms
Atlanta did it well, too. Georgia Tech and Georgia State got new dorms, the MLB team got a new stadium (which is now GSU's football stadium!) and the NBA team got a new arena.
It paints a completely different picture, doesn't it? The point is that it takes a little more than simply looking at one or the other. This is one way where DMA is a better representation of the market, even though there are some obvious flaws in that method too. This is also why companies looking to expand their businesses don't rely on any of those metrics, but hire people to do true market analyses.
Right. I think the lists and stats are just for "numbers minded individuals" to back up common sense, and not really a "accept the numbers devoid of common sense" thing.
It's always immensely important to know WHY stats are what they are and not just follow stats.