Kcb12345
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2017
- 31,487
- 25,023
Is this confirmed? Haven't seen anything else posted. Sorry if it was earlier just couldn't see it when I went back.
Is this confirmed? Haven't seen anything else posted. Sorry if it was earlier just couldn't see it when I went back.
I don't think he gets moved but calling him a 70-80 point player is a bit misleading.
He's like top 10 in scoring since joining the nucks.
This has been a tough season for us nuck fans but at the end of the day we are a point out of the playoffs despite not icing a full lineup once this season and two games with our 5 best players.
Demko should only get better and if the team can build off Saturday's win there is zero reason to trade a legit 1C, especially for a shit package.
I doubt stars fans feel the need unload Robertson for a loss despite a poor season by his standards with the only difference being the absolutely shit media causing shit here.
JTM had a career high of 56 playing for the Rangers over 5 years, pretty mid at the time too. I'd love to get Laf, not writing his upside off at all. Bruins got the least appealing pieces to me.There’s nothing from the Rangers that interests me. Chytil is 1 real hard body check away from ending his career, Schneider is not a good defensive player, and Lafreniere is about as mid as you can get. KAM screams Tyler Myers 2.0. No real good prospects.
Bruins and Stars are better.
There’s nothing from the Rangers that interests me. Chytil is 1 real hard body check away from ending his career, Schneider is not a good defensive player, and Lafreniere is about as mid as you can get. KAM screams Tyler Myers 2.0. No real good prospects.
Bruins and Stars are better.
If a deal with the Rangers can become resurrected, I think it's very difficult. I don't think it's a fit between these teams.
Essentially the only way it makes sense for the Rangers includes Zibanejad. Maybe that's with a futures sweetener back to the Canucks, but that's still a difficult deal to make happen.
The discussed "Chytil, Sykora, Chmelar for Miller deal" people were talking about may not be bad from a value perspective for the Rangers, but it still creates all sort of cap problems going into next year with three high priced 32 year old centers, two of which are very risky propositions (and that's a generous way of putting it for Zibanejad).
I really don't see how it makes any sense to include Lafreniere or Schneider like the Canucks want. That doesn't solve any of the Rangers problems to make that deal. The team isn't in this "panic, spin the wheel and find a trade" mode people think. They're playing their best hockey all season. Arguably the best hockey in the league the last few weeks. No team makes some "YOLO' trade then.
8 million in 3 years will be nothing. NHL removed escrow from players and cap going way up next 3 years. In fact the discussion is the NHL may have to say how high before trade deadline so GMA know.
Miller's is a top 10 player ... his cap gets gets cheaper ... meanwhile look at what Marner wants and then Mc David and in and in. so stop your nonsense mate
Here is the thing, this is real life not NHL 25. Dressing room dynamics and team make up are an important factor.. so on paper your reasoning makes sense and I agree but in real life it won't happen. Jim Nill will not make that trade.
The entire reason these guys are available is because of the dynamics of players/issues.. so why would a GM go out to create an issue for his own team?
You have to actually consider the players on both rosters that could be traded. This isn't only about JTM.This is J.T.'s world now, we're just living in it. He controls everything in this process. "Fits" don't exactly matter anymore when a player speaks his mind about where he wants to spend the next 5+ years to grind for a Cup.
I, for one, think NYR & VAN make just fine trading partners. Rangers have spending money and the Rangers have a ton of chips to throw in the pool. Rangers have been trying to make that one "big move" for about 4 years straight. Unfortunately all of this hinges on who's playing greedy and who's playing fair given the situation and the drama surrounding it. Allvin, Rutherford, & Drury need to come to an agreement that doesn't further exacerbate the drama to the media and fanbase on both sides. That's not easy in today's world.
Feel like last season was definitely forgotten there.
Yup. Could be a lot worse than the Kakko trade.I'm afraid of what Drury might do here. Seems out of his depth.
Yeah, id take Miller in a swap for Zib, but that's a win for the Rangers.You have to actually consider the players on both rosters that could be traded. This isn't only about JTM.
The Rangers quite literally have their top 6 centers. They simply aren't good enough. Actually, one of them isn't good enough (Trocheck is a decent 2C). Unless it's an exchange there involving Miller and Zibanejad, there's no sense in that from the Rangers perspective.
What do you do after this season when the team doesn't win the Cup and they have over 22M locked up in 3 centers who are 32 years old and declining? That's not a tenable situation. I trust that Drury isn't trading for that. Trading Chytil and some crap for Miller doesn't advance the team forward.
The deal would have been done yesterday if it was the rangers IMO. You guys are safe now lolI'm afraid of what Drury might do here. Seems out of his depth.
You mean the trade that shored up his defense and has the team flying since making the deal?Yup. Could be a lot worse than the Kakko trade.
Whether the Canucks choose to move JT Miller, Elias Pettersson, or keep both is none of my business, I have no preference for the team to choose one or the other or to keep them both and make it work, nor do I think my team would be in a position to acquire either.
All I'm saying is with the drama involved, if there's a motivated seller on Vancouver's end, and it's Miller going out the door, the eBay listing isn't going to be a "top 10 scorer in the NHL."
If a deal with the Rangers can become resurrected, I think it's very difficult. I don't think it's a fit between these teams.
Essentially the only way it makes sense for the Rangers includes Zibanejad. Maybe that's with a futures sweetener back to the Canucks, but that's still a difficult deal to make happen.
The discussed "Chytil, Sykora, Chmelar for Miller deal" people were talking about may not be bad from a value perspective for the Rangers, but it still creates all sort of cap problems going into next year with three high priced 32 year old centers, two of which are very risky propositions (and that's a generous way of putting it for Zibanejad).
I really don't see how it makes any sense to include Lafreniere or Schneider like the Canucks want. That doesn't solve any of the Rangers problems to make that deal. The team isn't in this "panic, spin the wheel and find a trade" mode people think. They're playing their best hockey all season. Arguably the best hockey in the league the last few weeks. No team makes some "YOLO' trade then.
Blockers to that are getting Zib to waive and how much do the Rangers have to add to him to get Miller. No idea how much value each of them has with their ages, contract lengths, NTC and cultural issues. Zibanejad probably has negative value at this point. Does Miller as well?Yeah, id take Miller in a swap for Zib, but that's a win for the Rangers.
It kind of is because you can't just will your way into trading a player with a NMC. I guess Drury thinks he can and has had success in doing so, but I think with Zibanejad it'll be even more difficult because it's a bigger contract with more years, a worse buyout (making the threat more hollow), and unlike Trouba he actually seems like he's doesn't give a f*** about his career anymore and is completely content in his mediocrity. Trouba wasn't even saying no to waiving in the past. It was that his wife was saying no.I'd obviously like it taken care of sooner than this, but for the Rangers the cap situation would be taken care of during the summer. That would be the latest, but it really isn't a barrier to making the trade now even if Zibanejad isn't going the other way (I wish he would).
Have the moves the Rangers have made since Drury became GM really struck you as those of a team with a good plan or concern for the future or good cap management? They've been a reactionary mess basically his entire tenure with the brief exception of last season. They absolutely would commit 22M locked up in 3 centers who are 32.You have to actually consider the players on both rosters that could be traded. This isn't only about JTM.
The Rangers quite literally have their top 6 centers. They simply aren't good enough. Actually, one of them isn't good enough (Trocheck is a decent 2C). Unless it's an exchange there involving Miller and Zibanejad, there's no sense in that from the Rangers perspective.
What do you do after this season when the team doesn't win the Cup and they have over 22M locked up in 3 centers who are 32 years old and declining? That's not a tenable situation. I trust that Drury isn't trading for that. Trading Chytil and some crap for Miller doesn't advance the team forward.
There’s nothing from the Rangers that interests me. Chytil is 1 real hard body check away from ending his career, Schneider is not a good defensive player, and Lafreniere is about as mid as you can get. KAM screams Tyler Myers 2.0. No real good prospects.
Bruins and Stars are better.
Yup and these rumors will die down with it.If they can find the same fire and intensity they played with last night? Everyone stays. Miller played well, Pettersson played well, Demko had one of his better games.