Yes, Zaitsev is off the books by the time they need to pay Sanderson. My point was related to Zub though. If they're paying Sanderson and Chabot big money, is their room to pay Zub 5+ a year? I'm talking in 23-24. That's when he needs a new deal. That's 110 games from now and jbd and Thomson should be ready to enter their primes.
I'm not knocking Zub. I'm looking at chess pieces on the board. I just don't think it's a foregone conclusion that we sign him long term, nor is it a foregone conclusion that we need to
It's a good question. I think to be a contending team, you're likely budgeting between 20-25 mil on the backend, some teams might come in a touch below that or a touch above but that seems like the target range.
If Sanderson hits his potention, with Chabot and Sanderson eating ~15-17 mil of out backend budget, Zub at 5 puts us at 20-21, leaving 4-5 to fill out 4 spots and that's if we are on the higher end.
I really like Zub, but I think if we have two 8 mil dmen, he's more of a luxury than necessity, and we're probably better off trying to fill things out with cheaper options like Holden, and prospects like JBD, Thomson, Kleven, and maybe Guenette
edit:it's worth pointing out that while I'm very high on Sanderson's potential, i might be getting ahead of myself with 8 mil a year for his next deal. He's not as flashy as Chabot, which might result in a slower assent in contract demands, we also might go shorter term and have a lower cap hit, maybe he gets a deal like Slavin, which would make fitting him in far easier, maybe Zub comes cheaper than 5, who knows.