Is he big enough?
The Jets top pp unit had one of its best stretches last year with him there. But I'd rather he be in KC spot and have KC down low.
Is he big enough?
Then where do we move Vilardi?The Jets top pp unit had one of its best stretches last year with him there. But I'd rather he be in KC spot and have KC down low.
Then where do we move Vilardi?
I'd have perfetti QB the second unit
That will never happen -The Jets top pp unit had one of its best stretches last year with him there. But I'd rather he be in KC spot and have KC down low.
ExactlyI'd have perfetti QB the second unit
He's a righty, so you'd have to run it through the right side then?Vilardi in the bumper
That will never happen -
KC is not going low to set up the bumper - he's a shooter and has shown that he can put them in from there.
He's also able to skate or reverse out of trouble when the PK is pressuring our PP.
As long as 55 on PP1, it's all going through him - and KC will be the one timer.
Cole should be QB'ing the second PP and find him a shooter and someone in the bumper -
Exactly
I think soIs he big enough?
Really think the toffoli trade was because he's a right shot... and not a perfetti conspiracyHe's a righty, so you'd have to run it through the right side then?
Monahan was the bumper specialist. He played that spot in MTL and assumed it when he got here.Really think the toffoli trade was because he's a right shot... and not a perfetti conspiracy
We dont have enough rh to run 1-3-1 with scheif and vilardi on bumper/halfwall
Yes I think toffoli was a vilardi replacement and not a perfetti replacement... but then vilardi got healthyMonahan was the bumper specialist. He played that spot in MTL and assumed it when he got here.
IIRC toffoli played down low until Vilardi came back from injury then was bumped to PP2
I suppose it could be bothYes I think toffoli was a vilardi replacement and not a perfetti replacement... but then vilardi got healthy
I suppose you could be wrong!!! \m/I suppose it could be both
I hope so too -It hasn't worked in four years with everything going through Mark. I hope they are open to different ideas.
I’m waiting for someone to say face offs are not statistically significant
Oh wait
I’m a believer that they are and can make a difference
That will never happen -
KC is not going low to set up the bumper - he's a shooter and has shown that he can put them in from there.
He's also able to skate or reverse out of trouble when the PK is pressuring our PP.
As long as 55 on PP1, it's all going through him - and KC will be the one timer.
Cole should be QB'ing the second PP and find him a shooter and someone in the bumper -
Exactly
So throw Scheifele on the second PP ? I really hope they don't do that.I hope so too -
And who knows - maybe this is the year they actually make decisions based on need rather than player pandering.
They aren’t going to put Scheifele on the 2nd PP. It is summer and people throw darts at the wall to have something to talk about. Sure we had a bad PP but it was even worse when Scheifele was out of the lineup. Hopefully with Lauer out we see some system changes and we get a better functioning PP.So throw Scheifele on the second PP ? I really hope they don't do that.
I'm not saying that although it is an option - they need to address the issue which might include convincing him to be more active on the PP.So throw Scheifele on the second PP ? I really hope they don't do that.
yes but their current team gets a week to match.Tender mean the players signed?
Ah kk wasn't sure if that meant they signed. But saw STL traded with PIT for their original picks back too this morningyes but their current team gets a week to match.
Kane probably goes LTIR so they have room if they want to keep either or both