Ah yes. The dark side is strong in them as well.You’re forgetting the Oilers and Bettman, too!
Ah yes. The dark side is strong in them as well.You’re forgetting the Oilers and Bettman, too!
No it was a door opened and now you want it closed
The thing is my friend we need to discuss and learn from each other. In todays world we are always to quick to shut down progressive discussionYou're saying this like I have any power to make it happen. People are entrenched in their own beliefs, and aren't going to move for the sake of other people. It's a waste of time to argue. That's it. You're not going to change my mind, and I'm not going to change yours. I've been terminally online far too long to see how these discussions play out. Nothing changes.
The thing is my friend we need to discuss and learn from each other. In todays world we are always to quick to shut down progressive discussion
I think this is way too low. They’d ask for Heinola, Perfetti and probably a 2ndSee, I was thinking actually a high pick plus Lambert or Lucius. Not crazy about giving up the pick but Chychrun would be a great add who fits our window well. Not sure how far off either of our proposals are.
Yeah, probably. The price is likely somewhere in the middle or Chychrun goes elsewhere. Perfetti is basically untouchable.I think this is way too low. They’d ask for Heinola, Perfetti and probably a 2nd
I’ve noticed over the last few years in my area of business that people are getting more and more polarized. I think there is a direct correlation to people not feeling comfortable discussing and become entrenched in extreme views.Discussion is great. What a boring world this would be if we all agreed on everything. It’s how we do it that’s the key.
You’re right, we shut down conversations far too quickly these days. My feelings aren’t hurt when someone disagrees with me. If anything, I have more respect for them because they’re willing to stand their ground and think instead of just resorting to name calling.
My brother and I are on the complete opposite sides of the political spectrum but we have absolutely the best times having those discussions. It’s because we respect each other as another human being, not because we always agree with other, but because a lot of thought goes into each of our points. And of course, we’re willing to admit that occasionally the other person might be right. Occasionally.
There is no more "agree to disagree"
Your entitled to your opinion these days, as long as it's what the masses deem is the correct opinion.
In some countries it's quite acceptable. Stop projecting your ideals on everyone else.I agree that there's no more agree to disagree, especially as it pertains to the rights and privileges that we invoke and revoke. Used to be that stoning and burning people because we thought they were a witch was appropriate. Now we don't. In fact, it's quite clearly murder. It's no longer culturally appropriate or acceptable to be a racist, homophobe, transphobe, etc.
In some countries it's quite acceptable. Stop projecting your ideals on everyone else.
Canada is part of the world, not the center of it.
There is no more "agree to disagree"
Your entitled to your opinion these days, as long as it's what the masses deem is the correct opinion.
Well first, he's Russian Orthodox.Provorov is a practicing Catholic first and foremost.
You are politicizing and being presumptive as to Provorov's motivations. Completely unfair and extremely biased on your part.
He chose to express his belief in his faith and respect it, nothing more.
If you don't like it too bad.
My faith guides me as well... and no one is going to make me go against my beliefs.
At the same time my faith compels me to forgive you Corgis'... and I do.
He's exercised his free speech. That' has nothing to do with anyone taking a critical thought to what his speech means. Is anyone saying he should be jailed? Did he get charged today? That's what free speech is about, not being able to say or do anything with nobody criticizing it.It would be really interesting to see how many people who are ok with Provorov exercising his free speech are also not ok with players kneeling during the national anthem. For those people they are just supporting the cause they support, which in this case would homophobia. Labeling it as supporting free speech is just a flimsy spin.
Ahhhhh. The ol’ Nuremberg Defence. Usually not a recommended strategy but these are strange times we live in.His actual profession is about presenting whatever management deems best to appeal to advertisers and fans. His refusal to participate was bad for the business. The professional thing to do would have been to put his personal beliefs aside and do what management decided was best for the organization.
I say this as a conservatively minded individual who hates these "virtue signaling" events.
Byram is looking more and more like a bad pick. You love to see it, really.Looks like the As have a complete squad apart of Landeskog who has missed most of the year and Byram who is injured more than he plays, they have a long way to go to make the playoffs but if any team can make up ground it's them
Ahhhhh. The ol’ Nuremberg Defence. Usually not a recommended strategy but these are strange times we live in.
Byram is looking more and more like a bad pick. You love to see it, really.
For me, it’s just the way Byram fell into their laps that makes me bitter. Everyone was publicly fellating Sakic for that trade when he was quite lucky all things considered that Ottawa a) didn’t protect the pick and b) fell off a cliff."I'm only here so I don't get fined."
Call me bitter and petty, but I'm totally on board with picks not panning out for opponents.
Why? I thought the Canucks were trying to loseBoudreau might get fired during the 1st intermission