Around the League 39: Will Kessel Sign in Winnipeg? The World Waits with Dogged Breath!

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm also not convinced Zegras is as good as advertised. Sure he has 10/10 skill, but is he the forward that can help your team win a championship (assuming he has a good surrounding cast)? I don't know. Defensively he leaves a lot to be desired.

In any case, I think this is a good deal for both parties. A lot of the really long term deals that fans love these days are way riskier than we think. It's possible that young players don't progress the way we think they will to age into the contracts.
He’s so much flash at this point he seems like he may just be a luxury to have. He puts Butts in seats and that makes him worth keeping until they’re a contending team. I really like this deal for the team, they’ll know a lot more about who the player is later on. It’ll be more expensive then but then it becomes the cost of doing business you need to get done. Verbeek did well to flex his power here.
 
Like most times there isn’t much of interesting players on waivers but, Ottawa’s (Y)egor Sokolov is really interesting. 2020 2nd round, RW. 6’3 224lbs. Looked decent in his end of year 5 games with Ottawa last season.

Im not expecting us to get anyone on waivers but I would definitely put in a claim. Let him play on the 4th line with Noesen until Svech really is ready. If he is good then keep him, if not offer him back to Ottawa
 
I'd gladly take Laf and give him the KK treatment. Bring him in, give him one year to prove it, and then offer him long term at a pretty reasonable rate in hopes he breaks out in a way that makes that contract stupidly cheap. Worst case, he's a middle 6 player who makes a reasonable contract with long term stability in his career. Best case, he breaks out and is on one of the most team friendly contracts in the league.
 
He looks like he could be a PF type. Just another player who wasn’t a great skater that was rushed to the league. He just needs to focus on his skating and learn to be just a net front presence guy until his skating improves.

If he struggles again this season, i would take a flyer on him as a 3LW to see if he comes around to his potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cptjeff
For those that have watched him more, what does Laf have that could make him stand out?

His skating seems average. His shot isn't great but IIRC, he was known as more of a playmaker than a goal scorer coming into the draft.

His puck skills and hockey sense were his strength's coming into the draft, yet those have yet to show up at the NHL level.

Just curious as the times I watched him, he seemed underwhelming to me (in terms of where he was drafted). I'm not saying he won't still be a very good player, just commenting on what I've seen to date when I watched him.
 
For those that have watched him more, what does Laf have that could make him stand out?

His skating seems average. His shot isn't great but IIRC, he was known as more of a playmaker than a goal scorer coming into the draft.

His puck skills and hockey sense were his strength's coming into the draft, yet those have yet to show up at the NHL level.

Just curious as the times I watched him, he seemed underwhelming to me (in terms of where he was drafted). I'm not saying he won't still be a very good player, just commenting on what I've seen to date when I watched him.
his shot is decent and his puck skills are above average. I don't consider his hockey sense a strength. He's a guy that got by and won CHL POTY 2 times because he was physically just about fully mature at 16 and out-muscled everyone else in the Q and WJC with strong enough shot and puck skills to get by. He hasn't figured out how to adapt to the NHL where basically everyone is on his level physically or better, the game moves faster, and those moves that he could do where he had the time to pull them off aren't working at this level. Nobody in the NHL is going to give him the time or space to make those moves, and he isn't the kind of skater that McDavid or even Hall is to create the kind of space for himself to do them.
 
It’s seemed to me that he isn’t an exceptionally fast skater, but is a strong one. I don’t think he has the pace to create a lot of dangerous one on one situations. That could just be a style issue in that he has to adapt to being a different kind of scorer. He could be a good net front/rebound guy.

He looks like a second line power-ish winger. He could be an excellent complement to higher skilled linemates if he learns how to take advantage of that complimentary role.
 
It’s seemed to me that he isn’t an exceptionally fast skater, but is a strong one. I don’t think he has the pace to create a lot of dangerous one on one situations. That could just be a style issue in that he has to adapt to being a different kind of scorer. He could be a good net front/rebound guy.

He looks like a second line power-ish winger. He could be an excellent complement to higher skilled linemates if he learns how to take advantage of that complimentary role.
Honestly, he sounds like he would be a good fit with the Canes, and would bring us the kind of player that would complement what we already have very well.
 
It’s seemed to me that he isn’t an exceptionally fast skater, but is a strong one. I don’t think he has the pace to create a lot of dangerous one on one situations. That could just be a style issue in that he has to adapt to being a different kind of scorer. He could be a good net front/rebound guy.

He looks like a second line power-ish winger. He could be an excellent complement to higher skilled linemates if he learns how to take advantage of that complimentary role.
A Nino style player?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
It’s seemed to me that he isn’t an exceptionally fast skater, but is a strong one. I don’t think he has the pace to create a lot of dangerous one on one situations. That could just be a style issue in that he has to adapt to being a different kind of scorer. He could be a good net front/rebound guy.

He looks like a second line power-ish winger. He could be an excellent complement to higher skilled linemates if he learns how to take advantage of that complimentary role.
Thing is, he has to WANT to play that way and accept that it's going to be what it takes to make a bigger impact in the NHL. I have no idea what's going on in his head, but I could see how accepting that role may be difficult for a former 1st OA pick.
 
I'd gladly take Laf and give him the KK treatment. Bring him in, give him one year to prove it, and then offer him long term at a pretty reasonable rate in hopes he breaks out in a way that makes that contract stupidly cheap.
I don't really think this is how it worked, though. There has to be a mutual commitment beyond the initial 1xLOT offersheet with a clear understanding in what vicinity the years 2 to X will be.
 
Laf would have to come cheap, much cheaper than the Rags would want for a former 1st overall pick. I'd be open to it but like BBA asked above I don't actually see any potential big strengths or potential there. The Koko comparison makes sense on the surface but I think Koko showed much more potential with the habs than Laf has with the rags, and we needed a C. Laf would have the same issue here he has in NY, which is lack of opportunity due to better wingers ahead of him on the depth chart. His best landing spot would be somewhere he can play clear top 6 minutes and first PP minutes to try to get him to gel with other talented guys and get his confidence going. That's not here.
 
Laf would have to come cheap, much cheaper than the Rags would want for a former 1st overall pick. I'd be open to it but like BBA asked above I don't actually see any potential big strengths or potential there. The Koko comparison makes sense on the surface but I think Koko showed much more potential with the habs than Laf has with the rags, and we needed a C. Laf would have the same issue here he has in NY, which is lack of opportunity due to better wingers ahead of him on the depth chart. His best landing spot would be somewhere he can play clear top 6 minutes and first PP minutes to try to get him to gel with other talented guys and get his confidence going. That's not here.
Kotkaniemi flashed potential, but it certainly didn't come through in terms of numbers with Montreal. Both of them had 1 solid playoff run (9 points in 20 games in 21-22 for Laf, 8 points in 19 games in 20-21 for Kotkaniemi) but otherwise Kotkaniemi was trending backwards in regular season scoring while Lafreniere has at least been trending up in regular season scoring.

I won't argue with the issue of where Laf would play here, which would be an issue. OTOH, many feel Kotkaniemi is being forced into the 2C spot here as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
I don't really think this is how it worked, though. There has to be a mutual commitment beyond the initial 1xLOT offersheet with a clear understanding in what vicinity the years 2 to X will be.
Technically such an agreement would be in violation of the CBA, could anyone prove it. Technically.

But there's no reason the situation has to be structured identically. It's certainly possible he'd agree to the one year overpayment without the same sort of non assurance assurances we gave to KK. Remember, he'd still be an RFA and the outcome for him if we don't want to keep him is he becomes a UFA a couple years early. But it's two seasons before he's anything but a trade target.


As for RFA shenanigans more broadly, somebody really should go after Shane Pinto. 20G scorer, and Ottawa is in a cap jam and trying to sign him for an utter joke of a $1M contract. He wants $2.5 and is easily worth it. Up to $4.29m is only a 2nd. Sign him for a 1y, $3.5m contract, Ottawa probably can't match. We don't have the cap space with our overloaded D, but that situation is just ripe for the picking. If I'm, say, Detroit, I'm all over that. And even if they do match they have to move a player out at a huge discount to get under the cap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad