horner
Registered User
- May 22, 2007
- 8,805
- 5,197
He's a point producer should not be taken out of the lineup only getting better
Yeah, like Brodie and Muzzin. Really dropped the ball there.People forget he was a high scoring D back in OHL and AHL
No reason why can't produce given opportunties
Been a pleasent surprise so far
Great pick up.
As much as a i s***T on Dubas, he has acquired some great supporting players
Spezza, Gio, Kampf and Timmins
It's the key ones he really dropped the ball on
Nylander contract is just killing us!Yeah, like Brodie and Muzzin. Really dropped the ball there.
The value dubas has got in the trades hes won is greater than the value in the trades he's lost. He might have more "lost" trades, but most of them are leivo level losses.
I think that ends up being a fair trade at the end. The leafs got a lot out of Muzzin before the last off season.You can't be serious, there's being a fan but this is just... wow.
1) Marchment for Malgin is a 'minor loss'?
2) Foligno trade is just garbage on so many levels (and almost funny that the one piece we got in that trade - Noesen - is playing pretty well for Canes after being let go)
3) giving up a 1st (Seth Jarvis) for Marleau's contract...
4) I'd argue the Muzzin trade is the most brutal of his trades, sure we got some mileage (in games played, just over 2 full seasons, really) from JM but the price? Grundstrom, Durzi and 1st that became Tobias Bjornfot. Three NHL players for a top4 D.. wow, just wow.
heck even Barabanov to SJ for that nobody Suomela is a loss.
I'd turn your argument around that he hasn't had more than a "minor win" in any of his trades, but the losses have been anything but minor.
Man, I know misrepresenting and massively exaggerating the Marchment, Marleau, and Foligno trades are part of the whole hating Dubas playbook, no matter how many times the arguments are completely dismantled, but going after the Muzzin trade is a whole other level of ridiculous.
Timmins is looking really good so far. Making it real hard to take him out of the lineup.
There is just so much wrong here. I can't be bothered to pick it all apart so I'll just say that the Muzzin trade was great, he was exactly what we needed. Good trade for both teams.You can't be serious, there's being a fan but this is just... wow.
1) Marchment for Malgin is a 'minor loss'?
2) Foligno trade is just garbage on so many levels (and almost funny that the one piece we got in that trade - Noesen - is playing pretty well for Canes after being let go)
3) giving up a 1st (Seth Jarvis) for Marleau's contract...
4) I'd argue the Muzzin trade is the most brutal of his trades, sure we got some mileage (in games played, just over 2 full seasons, really) from JM but the price? Grundstrom, Durzi and 1st that became Tobias Bjornfot. Three NHL players for a top4 D.. wow, just wow.
heck even Barabanov to SJ for that nobody Suomela is a loss.
I'd turn your argument around that he hasn't had more than a "minor win" in any of his trades, but the losses have been anything but minor.
Yes, Dubas deserves major props for this one. I really hope he stays on as GM, he's done a good job for us, much better than any GM we've had in ages.Dubas deserves to go to prison for this robbery, jeez this guy is such a steal.
The record is what it is - overwhelmingly good - but unfortunately you refuse to see the record for what it actually is. Your claim is factually inaccurate. Let's get back to Timmins.Hey the record is what it is. There are no major 'wins' under his belt, but some pretty brutal losses
1) Marchment for Malgin IS a minor loss. Sure he showed some good offensive ability with the Panthers, but after signing his 4.5 million contract with the Stars his offense has dropped off this season. Maybe he'll turn it on and look better going forward, but losing him isn't the end of the world and its likely we wouldn't have the cap space to resign him anyways so we'd have to either let him walk or trade him regardless.You can't be serious, there's being a fan but this is just... wow.
1) Marchment for Malgin is a 'minor loss'?
2) Foligno trade is just garbage on so many levels (and almost funny that the one piece we got in that trade - Noesen - is playing pretty well for Canes after being let go)
3) giving up a 1st (Seth Jarvis) for Marleau's contract...
4) I'd argue the Muzzin trade is the most brutal of his trades, sure we got some mileage (in games played, just over 2 full seasons, really) from JM but the price? Grundstrom, Durzi and 1st that became Tobias Bjornfot. Three NHL players for a top4 D.. wow, just wow.
heck even Barabanov to SJ for that nobody Suomela is a loss.
I'd turn your argument around that he hasn't had more than a "minor win" in any of his trades, but the losses have been anything but minor.
1) Marchment for Malgin IS a minor loss. Sure he showed some good offensive ability with the Panthers, but after signing his 4.5 million contract with the Stars his offense has dropped off this season. Maybe he'll turn it on and look better going forward, but losing him isn't the end of the world and its likely we wouldn't have the cap space to resign him anyways so we'd have to either let him walk or trade him regardless.
2) Foligno trade was bad, but the intention was there. People said the team needed more leadership and toughness and that's what Foligno was suppose to bring. Sucks that it didn't work out and this was probably Dubas' worst trade as Leafs GM.
3) Sucks that Lamoriello gave Marleau that contract with the extra year. Maybe the price to get rid of him was abit high, but perhaps that was the only move Dubas felt he had to get some cap space back.
4) People complained that the Leafs' defense was soft and wasn't very good. The same goes for their goaltending when Andersen wasn't getting the job done. So Dubas went out and addressed both needs with one trade. I don't know much about Bjornfot and it sucks to lose Grundstrom and Durzi, but Dubas went out and got players to help fix our goaltending and defensive issues at the time without giving up the farm.
Also its interesting how some Leafs fans complain about Dubas giving up valuable picks and prospects to add to the team and then you look at the trade thread here and there's other Leafs fan who WANT Dubas to give up major assets to go 'all in' this year. So either way whatever he does, he's likely going to be pissing off some Leafs fans no matter what.
If we gave Marchment 4 x 4.5 and he was producing 21 points in 41 games, you and everyone else with this point of view would be losing their minds.You can't be serious, there's being a fan but this is just... wow.
1) Marchment for Malgin is a 'minor loss'?
2) Foligno trade is just garbage on so many levels (and almost funny that the one piece we got in that trade - Noesen - is playing pretty well for Canes after being let go)
3) giving up a 1st (Seth Jarvis) for Marleau's contract...
4) I'd argue the Muzzin trade is the most brutal of his trades, sure we got some mileage (in games played, just over 2 full seasons, really) from JM but the price? Grundstrom, Durzi and 1st that became Tobias Bjornfot. Three NHL players for a top4 D.. wow, just wow.
heck even Barabanov to SJ for that nobody Suomela is a loss.
I'd turn your argument around that he hasn't had more than a "minor win" in any of his trades, but the losses have been anything but minor.
It's funny how badly some people hate Dubas that they are pathologically compelled to double down in the face of overwhelmingly being wrong.
Someone made a ridiculous claim that (paraphrasing here a bit) the worst trade Dubas made was the Leivo deal... ironically enough, that's the move that matters the least in grand scheme of things, Leivo was and still is a fringe NHLer, nothing more. I just pointed out all the other moves that seem way worse than that one.The record is what it is - overwhelmingly good - but unfortunately you refuse to see the record for what it actually is. Your claim is factually inaccurate. Let's get back to Timmins.
If you think about it none of it really matters anymore. It is what it is
This year really is the breakpoint year. If we dont' do well in the playoffs, well Dubas won't be here
If we do, then we can review what worked
No point of beating the dead horse
Timmins. This thread is about Timmins
It's funny how badly some people hate Dubas that they are pathologically compelled to double down in the face of overwhelmingly being wrong.
If we gave Marchment 4 x 4.5 and he was producing 21 points in 41 games, you and everyone else with this point of view would be losing their minds.
That's the thing I disagree with. I get that playoff success is very important, but that shouldn't be the be all end all in deciding whether or not Dubas should continue being GM of the Leafs. I just don't think that it makes sense that the difference between Dubas losing his job this year and being safe for a season or two more is if the Leafs beat Tampa in game 7 last season. That one playoff series win means his job is safe for at least one more season.
Timmins for Douglas are the kind of moves that we rarely saw from previous Leafs GMs. The same goes for his drafting where the Leafs had very few prospects to look forward to before Dubas came on board.
That wasn't me, and if you realized it wasn't me, I don't know why you added a note on the end instead of not posting the false accusation in the first place, or removing it.Buddy, you're the one who made this ridiculous claim that (paraphrasing here a bit) the worst trade Dubas made was the Leivo deal... ironically enough, that's the move that matters the least in grand scheme of things, Leivo was and still is a fringe NHLer, nothing more. I just pointed out all the other moves that seem way worse than that one.
(correction, it wasn't you - apologies for that)
I just did - again, apologized.That wasn't me, and if you realized it wasn't me, I don't know why you added a note on the end instead of not posting the false accusation in the first place, or removing it.
It is true though that trades of fringe NHLers that age out of prospect status and don't have much team control left aren't very notable, like Leivo, or Marchment.