CaptainChef
Registered User
And I'm fine with that. HF prospect ranker had those guys ranked 7.5C which seems fair, exactly same as Petan which I might begrudgingly consider a fair trade in a one for one
Proposal: Ana-wpg
- Thread starter ulf
- Start date
And I'm fine with that. HF prospect ranker had those guys ranked 7.5C which seems fair, exactly same as Petan which I might begrudgingly consider a fair trade in a one for one
lindholmie
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2015
- 1,981
- 63
im sure you would dude. but defensemen are worth more than wingers. montour outscored petan as a defensemen and larsson has more potential than montour. noone else would do that 1 for 1 but jets fans. and for a reason
JetsHomer
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 10,941
- 3,146
Yes we get it, all Duck defensemen are amazing, they likely have 6 top pairing guys in their system, right?
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Good post. Morrissey had 2 goals and 10 points in 28 AHL games in his draft+1 season (mostly playoff games). Lindholm had 1 goal and 11 points in 44 AHL games in his draft+1 season. Lindholm was always a better prospect than Morrissey. Scoring rates in the AHL aren't a great way to assess young defensive prospects. Morrissey has high end skating, skills and vision. He has a chance to be a top end NHL defenseman, as does Theodore.
Ducks Nation*
Registered User
- Mar 19, 2013
- 16,329
- 4
except the fact lindholm is elite defensively and one of the best shutdown defenders in the world and morrissey is an offensive defensemen.....
Theridion
Registered User
They probably do. Depending on the need and team they are on.... and if we are talking about today or 4 years from now.
I can see 4 Ducks dmen hitting top pairing potential with 7 or more of them hitting top 4.
Depends where they play though.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,768
- 39,728
I'll have what he's having
Vatanen Fowler lindholm manson and despres are all already top 4 dmen... that means 2 of Theodore, Montour and larrson have to be top 4 to have 7, it's not unrealistic.
Top pair guys I'd say lindholm and Theodore are the only legit option, larsson still to raw to make that claim
And that by this time in Morrissey's career, Lindholm had already forced his way into 2 full NHL seasons amassing a +54 rating and 64 points. Meanwhile Morrissey has only earned his way into playing 1 singular NHL game.
Can't possibly be any difference between the two prospects nor their upside...
lindholmie
Registered User
- Feb 22, 2015
- 1,981
- 63
I'll have what he's having
lindholm
fowler
vatanen
depres
manson
theodore
montour
larsson
is it really that unrealistic?
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,768
- 39,728
JetsHomer
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 10,941
- 3,146
lindholm is pretty easily better then any of those options
Need a contract to play in the NHL.
He's pointing out the irony of a Ducks fan chirping about Trouba when Lindholm isn't signed either
Maukkis
EZ4ENCE
- Mar 16, 2016
- 10,721
- 7,597
"the irony of a Ducks fan chirping about Trouba when Lindholm isn't signed either"
Wouldn't personally fire shots at anyone if my team gets called out by the player himself for lowballing.
By the way, you can count on me putting that post in my signature, if karma strikes back.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
"the irony of a Ducks fan chirping about Trouba when Lindholm isn't signed either"
Wouldn't personally fire shots at anyone if my team gets called out by the player himself for lowballing.
By the way, you can count on me putting that post in my signature, if karma strikes back.
Go for it.
JetsHomer
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 10,941
- 3,146
Go for it.
which of Lindholm, Randell or Fowler are the Ducks going to be forced to give up for next to no return because they literally don't have enough money to ice a full hockey team?
Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,408
- 24,576
