aufheben
#Norris4Fox
2 goals in 68:00~ min of PP time. So, if we played an entire game 5-on-4, we could still lose. Cool.
BRB, I have a gripe with both ES and the PP. However, I have more of a problem with the PP. ES has not been awful, though I think a lot of everything that happen stems from ES. The inept ability to have a transition game from playing a collapsing defense never allows this team to carry momentum or get into an offensive groove that they can then carry onto a PP possession. They have zero confidence with the puck and they constantly fall back on the dump and chase. They collapse so low that they don't have numbers going the other way and therefore all the puck carrier can do is dump it in. And then when we dump it in we lose the puck battle because we don't have the numbers. It is a trickle down effect. I think they get away with the good enough ES play because of the goalie they have and their top 4 defensemen. I really believe the positive feeling for the Torts supporters about strong ES play is clouded way too much. The inadequacies are there. Their whole system restricts their offense.
But even so, going back to the PP, if Torts was a strong offensive coach or if he had the PP units performing then I could lay off on their loose collapsing defensive strategy because at least their PP units would be winning games. However, they aren't. The Caps series should not have went 7 games. They shouldn't have played as many playoff games last year as they did with a good PP. But this year's PP is even worse. 5%. That's awful. They could've taken Game 1 and last night with just an average PP. It is sad. Very sad. They've need a PP coach during Torts' entire tenure. He refuses to let anyone in.
I honestly, do not hate Torts. You cannot blame him for what has happened to Richards. I think Torts has great defensive qualities, as does Sullivan. I think Torts makes certain players tougher and prepares them better. But certain players he does not work well with and he just pushes them away rather them integrate them. You need to score goals to win the game. You cannot rely on a grind it out game with a lucky bounce or garbage goals all the time to win.
I agree with virtually all of this. So what is with the hate? What is with the need to see him gone with no viable replacement just to start this whole thing over again?
Im on board with forcing Tortorella to employ an offensive X & O's/PP guy for next season. If he refuses, then give him the boot.
Im not even a huge Tortorella fan, but I find this movement to get rid of him to be nothing more than a knee-jerk reaction stemming from frustration.
The the plan is essentially to tank?
Compare our cluster**** of a coach with this guy.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nhl--f...light-approach-with-young-team-175504835.html
You don't need to be a jack-ass to be a tough coach.
But in this no accountability (dis)organization even a 4 and out embarrassment won't guarantee we look for alternatives.
Yes.
It's the only way to get franchise centers and even franchise defensemen.
If I was in charge (5 yr rebuild plan)
1. Fire Sather, Gorton and Clark
2. Hire management from a winning organization that are content with youth movement. (Hextall)
3. Full roster turnaround. Lundqvst, Nash, Girardi, Brassard, Staal, Callahan, Pyatt, Boyle, Richards all moved. Keep MDZ, Moore, Stepan, McDonagh, Kreider, Hagelin along with other young players bought in from trade.
4. Sign hired mercenaries from FA and move them at TDD unless they play well.
5. 3 yr rebuild plan from the draft. 3 straight top 3 picks, hopefully picking up a few franchise players.
6. Compete for playoffs in yr 4.
7. Add finishing pieces in yr 5 and open up a 3 yr window for competing with ELCs and bridge contracts in place.
That's just a ridiculous statement. Tons of "franchise centers and defenseman" have won Cups with teams other than the one that drafted them.
Messier
Borque
Chara
Stevens
Niedermayer
Carter
Richards
Etc.. etc...
Tanking isn't the answer and it certainly won't work in NY.
If I was in charge (5 yr rebuild plan)
1. Fire Sather, Gorton and Clark
2. Hire management from a winning organization that are content with youth movement. (Hextall)
3. Full roster turnaround. Lundqvst, Nash, Girardi, Brassard, Staal, Callahan, Pyatt, Boyle, Richards all moved. Keep MDZ, Moore, Stepan, McDonagh, Kreider, Hagelin along with other young players bought in from trade.
4. Sign hired mercenaries from FA and move them at TDD unless they play well.
5. 3 yr rebuild plan from the draft. 3 straight top 3 picks, hopefully picking up a few franchise players.
6. Compete for playoffs in yr 4.
7. Add finishing pieces in yr 5 and open up a 3 yr window for competing with ELCs and bridge contracts in place.
If the defense for Tortorella is, "Well then Glen Saver deserves to go too," then okay. I'm down with that. Both are living off past laurels.
That's just a ridiculous statement. Tons of "franchise centers and defenseman" have won Cups with teams other than the one that drafted them.
Messier
Borque
Chara
Stevens
Niedermayer
Carter
Richards
Etc.. etc...
Tanking isn't the answer and it certainly won't work in NY.
Thank god you're not in charge then Kershaw. I get some of what you would want to do. Others leave me scratching my head. Why move Brassard? Young, skilled, cheap. Makes no sense. Why fire Gorton? He's largely responsible for where Boston currently stands, and has proven he knows what he's doing. I hand the reigns to Gorton if anything. Move Lundqvist? I guess only so you can be guaranteed to draft high?
Brassard is not a long term fixture as a 2C in my eyes. He is also not good enough offensively to hide his defensive deficiencies to be a shutdown C. Gorton has worked under Sather and was the director of player personnel for many years during the Rangers years of mediocre early playoff exits and low seedings. I just want to clean house completely and start with a change in team direction. And moving Lundqvist guarantees a Lotto pick.
Mark Messier trade was how many years ago? 22? 25?
Raymond Bourque was 39 at the time he was traded.
Zdeno Chara wasn't NHL quality with the Isles before the Yashin trade. No one expected him to turn into one of the greatest defensemen of this generation.
Stevens was over 23 yrs ago I'm thinking. So long ago to even think about.
Neidermayer only left the Devils after his Norris Trophy year to play alongside his brother to finish his career, which he openly admitted to doing so. The Devils offered him the Max contract.
Carter and Richards are far from superstar players.
The last franchise #1C moved in a trade and under contract must've been Joe Thornton, 7 seasons ago.
Whatever the 'Rangers way' is, it's clearly proven to be inefficient this millennium. I guess we can merely accept the fact that this team will continue to overpay players past their primes to search for elite talent.
brass is a 2C regardless of your irrational dislike for him. Gorton built boston. moving lundqvist? yea you get a lotto pick but the best goalies in the world dont exactly grow on trees
Brassard is a 2C by default on offensively incompetent teams like the Rangers and Blue Jackets.
you making excuses for everything doesn't change the fact that all of the above, just off the top of my head, were franchise type players that won cups on teams that didn't draft them. it proves, however, that your statement was false.
nice try, though.
He hasn't been playing like one here.
The time for what Kershaw is proposing was 2004. Sather just couldnt bring himself to go through with a true rebuild.
Retained Jagr who re-emerged. Stuck in purgatory ever since.