LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
Is this just a cap-type move? Or does this signify a more significant injury?
Injured reserve just frees up a roster space. Tippett’s cap hit still stays on though.
Is this just a cap-type move? Or does this signify a more significant injury?
Thanks. I never cared to look into how roster moves work.Injured reserve just frees up a roster space. Tippett’s cap hit still stays on though.
No problem. They have so much cap room they never put Ellis on LTIRInjured reserve just frees up a roster space. Tippett’s cap hit still stays on though.
Fedotov is a lost cause at this point. In the worst-case scenario that Hart is no longer a Flyer after this season, they are left with Ersson, Petersen, and Sandstrom (if re-signed). They would also be looking at the better part of $16.7 million of cap space (as you have pointed out), with RFAs Tippett, Zamula, Brink, and (maybe) Poehling to re-sign. Of this group, Tippett's increase should be the only significant jump. Decisions on Walker and Seeler, but if they start the season with Sanheim, Drysdale, York, Ristolainen, Andrae, Zamula, it wouldn't be the end of the world. So a decent veteran G could be added for $2-3 million if necessary and leave plenty of room for deals with cap dumps or other more interesting trades involving taking on high salary.If Hart is gone, Flyers have a short-term issue.
Peterson is under contract for next season, so if you're rebuilding you can live with that for a season while Kolosov spends the season in the AHL.
The two draft picks are years away, the Russian will probably spend next year in the KHL, but figure at least two seasons there, the CHL goalie has another year in juniors, then to the AHL in 2025-26.
So in the long-run they seem pretty set, in the short run it's a little iffy.
I'm sure they'd love to pry Fedotov away if possible.
If Hart is gone, Flyers have a short-term issue.
Peterson is under contract for next season, so if you're rebuilding you can live with that for a season while Kolosov spends the season in the AHL.
The two draft picks are years away, the Russian will probably spend next year in the KHL, but figure at least two seasons there, the CHL goalie has another year in juniors, then to the AHL in 2025-26.
So in the long-run they seem pretty set, in the short run it's a little iffy.
I'm sure they'd love to pry Fedotov away if possible.
Don't tend so close to me.I'll take Nabokov purely for his namesake.
Contract to 2027 would be a fine use for a 7th rd pick, the rights would slide and you'd have a great value pick who'd be training in a top "minor" league and NHL ready four years after being drafted - which is how long it takes an 18 year to be close to NHL ready.If they want to bolster the goalie pool easily, quickly, with less of a waiting time?
They should probably just draft one of:
Ilya Nabokov (20 years old, 6'0, .926 sv% in KHL, KHL contract expires in 2025)
Dmitri Gamzin (20 years old, 6'2, .949 sv% in KHL, KHL contract expires in 2025)
and sign one of:
Artemi Pleshkov (21 years old, 5'10, .926 sv% in KHL, KHL contract expires in 2025)
Maxim Motorygin (21 years old, 6'0, .919 sv% in KHL, KHL contract expires in 2025)
Pavel Moysevich is very interesting too as a 19 year old... and Belarusian to add to Flyers being THE destination for Belarusians aha... but has contract until 2027.
Got to be careful with Sv%, often a factor of the team in front of a goalie.That Moysevich guy has only played in 10 KHL games.
That said, Kolosov's .904 is disappointing when you consider there are 13 KHL goalies this season with at least a .925 save % with a minimum of 20 GP.
I agree, but man that's quite a disparity, and Kolosov's backup's numbers are virtually identical.Got to be careful with Sv%, often a factor of the team in front of a goalie.
I look at the backup's numbers as a check, if an experienced backup is playing much worse, it's probably the team.
Th Fedotov boat has sailed.
His current (arguably illegal) KHL contract does not expire until summer 2025.
His Flyers rights expire in summer 2024 and he will be an NHL UFA.
If he wants to come to North America:
A. It would probably only be in summer 2025.
B. He could then choose any team he likes.
Some other options.
Contract to 2027 would be a fine use for a 7th rd pick, the rights would slide and you'd have a great value pick who'd be training in a top "minor" league and NHL ready four years after being drafted - which is how long it takes an 18 year to be close to NHL ready.
Got to be careful with Sv%, often a factor of the team in front of a goalie.
I look at the backup's numbers as a check, if an experienced backup is playing much worse, it's probably the team.
Surely they can at least try to make the argument for an exemption to this, considering the circumstances?
Will we ever see another 5’10 goalie in the NHL?
Yeah, what I want my GM to do, is definitely tell all of our competitors that we are definitely trading two players, and there is 0 interest in re-signing them. Just to make sure there is absolutely no leverage in a trade negotiation.