@Striiker
He's not wrong, their numbers are improved since that arbitrary date, but he's doing the thing where he's ignoring half the sample, which says they're probably not above average nor are they historically bad. Is that improvement (we don't have to totally discount it) or just fluctuation? It's also a softer stretch of the season, with 10/18 games against below average offenses by xGF/60. As for the PK, they have the highest xGA since Nov 8.
If in what might be the best stretch of the season you're 19th in xGF% at 5v5, because despite the organizational talking point offense still matters, that's not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Not to mention this sample includes the 10 game losing streak! Add in score effects and 19th in CA/60 and 11th in xGA/60 doesn't look as mind blowing. Meanwhile, they're 12th in CF/60 and 26th in xGF/60. Not taking offensive risks can often allow you to be structured going back to your own zone to avoid rush chances, but it's not necessarily winning hockey.
A funny quirk of that sample is: do you know who was mostly driving those defensive stats the last month? Bellows, Sedlak, Deslauriers, Laczynski, Brown, Seeler, Braun. It's ALL fringe players. No joke, it's almost an exact split between the fringe depth guys and the proven NHL guys. Is that even a good thing? Is it a meaningful thing? Is it a sustainable thing?