I'm not saying those models don't show Seeler is having a good season. I'm saying I think Dom's market value thing feels like a gimmick. So, Seeler has a negative GSVA every season, but 29 games puts his market value at $3.7 mil? And I'm supposed to believe the guy below has a market value of $2.7 mil? I don't see how that's possible unless it's entirely based around a 20-ish game sample.......which is why I think it seems gimmicky. Probably so they can have wildly fluctuating cards through the season for article fodder.
I got a chuckle this summer when JFresh ran a rough NHL comparison tool and every skilled defender's least similar comparable (Girard, Hughes, Dahlin, even Sanheim) was "Nick Seeler." I mean, we watch Seeler -- his skill-set looks fringe as ever, with a background that shows him as fringe (his career numbers are as negative as they are presently positive). He's a big beneficiary of these team adjusted stats as well, having a good 3rd pairing start with most of the defensive group getting slaughtered statistically. That's where I imagine the xGAR, WAR, etc. overstate things.