I love this strategy of yours.
Hextall did some wrong things, Fletcher did some (more) wrong things - so who cares and they're equal I guess.
No, Fletcher is much worse than Hextall. He's a net-negative and it's not even close who is total garbage at their job.
what was the right things Flusher did?
nIsky for Gudas he gets a plus.
Wisdom trade probably good
Desnoyers ditto
what else?
If u say Braun trade, then use common sense. Would you rather have drafted Boldy at 11 and use the 2nd and 3rd picks to trade up for Brink(u probably may have had to add another pick say a 4 or 5). Or so do u prefer the combo of Braun, York, and Brink? At best its a C- trade
Ghost trade f
Fisto trade f
Deangelo trade at best d, reality d-/f for a team needs the picks to rebuild
G for Tippett and a 1st down the road. It seems like G hamstrung Flusher. So how can u rate the trade properly? b-/c+? meh trade?
jake for cam its putting a new paint job on pool chairs at the titanic. a nothing trade that added another year of cap headache to whomever takes over a c trade if there ever was a c trade.
Ellis trade f. Talent wise the trade was correct. The question becomes did Flusher know the medicals and ignore them or are flyers doctors stupid? Or flusher just unlucky for those that lick Flusher feet.
Gus signing F lots of suxatude
Nate signing/trade f uber suxatude
Grant d trade but really is so much more AV's misuse that Flusher's mis trade. Grant 4c 8 min a night was fine. Grant at 3c or 4w as Barzal shutdown defender had no shot of working.
Hartman for Pitlick at best D. Now under AV Hartman would have never developed into a 60+ point player. And Pitlick had a an ok 4w season. But it is still fugly trade no matter how u look at it.
Trading down for York is a d at best. Boldy or Caufield (especially on the second go round) was better and obvious choices