JojoTheWhale
"You should keep it." -- Striiker
- May 22, 2008
- 35,962
- 111,116
You can't trademark Good. Who do you think you are, Ohio State?!
Their branding could really work here.
THE Dead Franchise ®
You can't trademark Good. Who do you think you are, Ohio State?!
Does anyone really believe that JVR at $5 mil for 1 season can't produce 25 goals and 50 points, with some managed play-driving ability, on a team with real structure and roster sensibility? Visually, I didn't really see a difference from his 62 point pace the year prior. He graded out as one of the best in relTM stats in the couple years before this one. It was a perfect storm of one of the worst offenses in the league, with horrific centers, no transition play, and the worst PP in the league. JVR can be a line/PP accelerator, but there is not a worse environment to utilize his strengths and flaunt his flaws.
Moving contracts is a lot about optics. The Flyers are so bad at that part. You can practically smell their disdain for certain players; they lower their usage and sink their value and air dirty laundry for seemingly no self-serving motive. Even if you want to dump someone, they don't grasp the idea of pumping them first. It's not a creative league, and what one team believes, other teams are willing to believe. Gostisbehere was a perfect encapsulation of it. And even if a few teams do plausibly want JVR, they know the Flyers are desperate, so what's the rush? Their asset management is a horror show.
By the time tomorrow is done, they're likely no longer able to strip things down anyway.
4 more years of Hayes
5 more years of Risto
5 more years of Ellis
8 more years of Couturier, but he should be tradeable.
Sanheim will be heading to UFA and have limited trade value.
4 more years of Laughton who may or may not be tradeable without retention.
3 more years of Atkinson.
5+ more years of the big free agency signing.
The credit cards are hitting their max unless the coming cap increases are significant.
Don't care about Risto as talking about this trade. Not ignoring anything. Guess you are ignoring the offensive side to his game. . Was a top 20 D man points wise in what 64 games? Adds no value.This reasoning was used to justify signing Ristolainen. You're ignoring the defensive side of the game, where he does a ton to cancel his offense.
A dman who has to be carried as hard as Slavin carried him isn't worth that haul or that contract, especially because our only dman who can carry him is already chained to Risto.
Let's say it again folks...
f*** Fletcher, f*** Scott, f*** AVs corpse, f*** stupid fans, I love you Lindblom, and f*** the Flyers
Cuck steers the helm of the SS Flyers about as well as the helmsman steered the TitanicAsking for a friend, would you consider this to be good management?
When Ghost was producing years ago were people complaining about this defense? If Tony D doesn't produce offensively then his positive contributions will be minimal at bestAgain, the people that complained about Ghost's defense better be ready to complain about Tony's. I have a feeling that won't happen though
I feel bad for Lindblom, but I can see why you could buy him out (as his 3M against the cap is gone and the buyout saves the Flyers an extra 333,333 in cap space).
Just to be clear here, most (from my vantage point) of the anger towards buying out Lindblom comes from the position that Chuck has put the team in where it's required. He's backed them into a corner because of his moronic decisions.
Do the optics suck with buying out a cancer survivor? Oh yes, very much so but they're made so much worse knowing that we got here buy extending players like Rasmus god damn Ristolainen.
Ypu sont need 333K in cap space if you're a bottom 5 team.
Or if you sont sign not one, but TWO bottom 4 defenders to 5M contracts.
Or if you don't sign a tweener 3C to 7M a year.
Or if you dont trade for a 6.7m cap hit thats never going to play.
Or if..... this can go on for a while.
Bad optics aside, Lindblom was a decent bottom 6 player who had decent stats the back half of the season. One of the few people on that team who WASNT overpaid.
How do you feel about Chuck paying to get rid of a 50 point defenceman last season?Don't care about Risto as talking about this trade. Not ignoring anything. Guess you are ignoring the offensive side to his game. . Was a top 20 D man points wise in what 64 games? Adds no value.
I know he was propped up. He isnt any good and all the other stuff.
Wonder if Sanheim will be inducted into the should have been hall of famer hall of fame.
*sigh*
OR...hear me out for a second...that guy talks directly out of his asshole and has no real insider infoConsidering the frequency of offseason injuries while training with this team, maybe Ustimenko said, "Yeah, I'm not following your regimen."
No, I am not ignoring the offensive side of his game. I have to specifically ponder it while gauging whether it's enough to cancel him being a black hole on defense.Don't care about Risto as talking about this trade. Not ignoring anything. Guess you are ignoring the offensive side to his game. . Was a top 20 D man points wise in what 64 games? Adds no value.
I know he was propped up. He isnt any good and all the other stuff.
Wonder if Sanheim will be inducted into the should have been hall of famer hall of fame.
I'm starting to wonder what Danny "special advisor to the GM" Briere is actually doing ... or not doing because he likes to watch Chuck digging his own grave with this org.
What current 50 point dman did he get rid of?How do you feel about Chuck paying to get rid of a 50 point defenceman last season?
Not possible. It is. He's far surpassed Holmgren, who at least spent assets on some good players.