First time, right?Hopefully this is the first time Dubas says no to a demand for a ridiculous contract.
Maple Leafs at crossroads as Zach Hyman nears exit - Sportsnet.ca
The Leafs are believed to have extended the pending unrestricted free agent a max term eight-year offer carrying an annual value a little over $4 million. But that’s still almost a million less per season than Hyman is being offered by the Edmonton Oilers, assuming a sign-and-trade with Toronto can be worked out to facilitate an eight-year deal.
Should that fall through, a seven-year contract in Edmonton carrying Hyman’s signature is expected to land in the neighbourhood of $5.5 million annually.
That’s why Dubas recently granted Hyman’s agent, Todd Reynolds, the freedom to speak to other teams before free agency officially opens on July 28. It could potentially land the Leafs an asset should a sign-and-trade scenario emerge, but it also allows both sides to start properly planning for an amicable end to their union.
As of early Thursday afternoon, Dubas said that he hadn’t heard from Reynolds about needing to negotiate anything with the Oilers. Hyman travelled to Edmonton on Wednesday to tour the team’s facilities -- even requesting to work out in the gym, a testament to his don’t-miss-a-day approach -- and all signs pointed to the Oilers emerging as the leading candidate for his services.
Toronto is willing to facilitate a sign-and-trade before the deadline to do so expires at 11:59 p.m. ET on Tuesday.
“We’re open to anything that can help to make our team better,” said Dubas. “If there’s fair value to be had there then we’ll certainly explore it.”
Ideally, he’d be calling a press conference instead to announce a new contract for the 29-year-old winger. That would almost certainly be the outcome if the NHL wasn’t governed by a hard cap system that requires tough decisions by teams carrying an outsized amount of established talent.
Probably something to do with taxes. It's pretty unfair a player can sign for 8 or 9 million in Tampa and end up making more money than if he signed 11 million in Toronto. Really favours the markets like Tampa with no tax and I'm surprised the league hasn't come up with a fair solution considering the cap is supposed to create parity.It's funny that players want to get as much money out of Toronto as possible .
Boston always seem to get sweet deals on there players.
They love playing there.
Toronto nope.
He still couldn't get it done in the playoffs. They got swept and he didn't play like worlds best player should in the playoffs. We have demanded results. McDavid got even worse if you compare him to our stars.
I can say that Marner is also trying, but that isn't good enough for him, why is it good enough for McDavid?
It's funny that players want to get as much money out of Toronto as possible .
Boston always seem to get sweet deals on there players.
They love playing there.
Toronto nope.
It's funny that players want to get as much money out of Toronto as possible .
Boston always seem to get sweet deals on there players.
They love playing there.
Toronto nope.
Whatever number Dubas set as the max for Hyman for the love of God just stick to it. Let agents know that bluffing isn't going to work anymore.
So help me if Dubas caves here and goes to 4.75 X 8 or whatever then just give agents a blank contract from now on and let them fill in their own amount.
If Leafs are offering a little over $4 mil per X 8 years and Edmonton is rumoured at $5-$5.5 mil X 8 years.
If you split the difference a pretty common negotiating tactic to meet in the middle ground of $1.5 mil difference on the high-end that makes it $750k /year difference or $4.75 mil X 8 years to stay in Toronto for Hyman..
You might just be nearly spot on what the Hyman camp might to trying to draw out of Leafs and then can also claim a hometown discount was given, and Zach took less to stay showing his loyalty to the team.
For most fans it seems to the term is the greatest concern (as no more than 5 years), but it seems 8 years is not a problem for Leafs nor Edmonton as both teams have extended him offers on full term, its just down to the dollar amount that needs finalizing now.
Which side is going to flinch now?
Why would he retire and walk away from 5 years of salary? That doesn't make sense.So bizarre to me that so many of you think it's a bad deal because of its length and his bad(-ish) knees and playing style. That perversely makes this quite a good deal. Hyman gets his well-deserved upfront payday with a lower AAV for Edmonton, he'll be great for around 3 years and then be forced to retire because of injuries, and only the insurance company suffers.
Let's be honest oilers have to overpay - our GM has all kinds of leverage but fails to use it
It would be hilarious after all this and he ends up staying.