Joe Hallenback
Moderator
- Mar 4, 2005
- 15,714
- 22,980
Waiting for the inevitable post at some point when they've lost 2 - 3games in a row eventually of, "I've been saying this all along to everyone that their metrics are not sustainable and they were pretenders".
look back a few pages there is 1 fan claiming that we can regress in defense and offenseI haven't seen anyone say anything about their metrics this year being unsustainable. Their shooting percentage as a team is 10.7% which is completely within a normal range.
if our special teams were good we would have a 10 point gap on the rest of the league lolThat's a thing about this team, normally I'm very cautious about things. Even last year when the Jets were rolling, I wasn't sold on them because their underlying metrics were just a smoke screen. There was two weeks in the middle of January where I finally decided to buy into the team, only for them to fall off.
I see none of that in this iteration. They are playing an incredible brand of hockey, and it's sustainable. All they need to do is fix their special teams.
Okay, that's enough of everybody waxing about the Jets. Please go back to underrating and ignoring us.
Yes Nibelheim. No one is safe.Not Nibelheim!
Is it bandwagon?f***ING WAGON BOYS
If the Jets were to win a Stanley Cup, they would hold the distinction of being the only city to have won both the Avco and Stanley Cups. (A completely irrelevant and useless statistic, but the
But as a 50 year plus Jet fan I love it.If the Jets were to win a Stanley Cup, they would hold the distinction of being the only city to have won both the Avco and Stanley Cups. (A completely irrelevant and useless statistic, but there you go)
He didn’t mean bandwagon.Is it bandwagon?
I've been a Jet fan since 1972.
I've lived in Edmonton since 1980 but always a Jet fan.
I watch every single Jet game since they returned to the league. The way the Jets ended the season last year I was seriously thinking to not renewing my NHL TV package because I thought they were a PO bubble team at best. Then the PLD trade happened and I loved the return that Chevy got for PLD but it was not enough for me to be a believer in this team. 2 days before the season started I had not renewed my NHL subscription of 11 years. Then Chevy resigned Scheifele and Hellebuych long term and removing all the doubt about what happens to them for this season. I couldn't help myself, I resigned for another season of Jets pain. While I thought that the Scheif/Helle deal would make the Jets a PO team I still expected them to be a wildcard team at best. I never expected to see this team. So to get back to the bandwagon, I was always on it, I just never thought that this team that I cheered for over 50 years could be doing what they are presently doing. I never dreamed they could be this good. History keeps me from going all in. I am still waiting for the eventual losing streak.
He didn’t mean bandwagon.
Wagon is a new term that the best I can figure means really great team.
Thank you. I get it now!They're rolling over everything.
They lost in OT the day this thread was created and then won 6 in a row since then. Not much of a jinx.Jinx thread is jinx
You must be new to jinxes. Historically speaking, most jinxes take in effect 3 months after the thread, which is why pre playoff threads are frowned uponThey lost in OT the day this thread was created and then won 6 in a row since then. Not much of a jinx.
By who?You must be new to jinxes. Historically speaking, most jinxes take in effect 3 months after the thread, which is why pre playoff threads are frowned upon
Don’t worry. I already reversed said jinx a page back.By who?
Teams with shit goalies always seem to dock teams with great goaltending. I had to laugh at the post you replied to. oilers fans have 1 trying to discredit the nucks all year based on nerd created algorithm's and the first post I read in this thread has one using the he same bull-shit for the the jets.It's as silly to say that the Jets get "bailed out by helle" as it would be to say that the Oilers get "bailed out by mcdavid"
Goaltending is one of 6 positions on the ice, and being stronger in that position and winning games is no better or worse than outshooting/outplaying opponents (which would be reflected in the "underlying stats" you're referring to)
I have no idea why some people forget that the goaltender is a part of the team, and having strong goaltending is every bit a valid strategy to build a team around as strong defence or strong centres. In fact, there are teams that are stacked at other positions that learn every season (sometimes many seasons in a row) that having a guy like helle back there would probably be a good idea
It's as silly to say that the Jets get "bailed out by helle" as it would be to say that the Oilers get "bailed out by mcdavid"
Goaltending is one of 6 positions on the ice, and being stronger in that position and winning games is no better or worse than outshooting/outplaying opponents (which would be reflected in the "underlying stats" you're referring to)
I have no idea why some people forget that the goaltender is a part of the team, and having strong goaltending is every bit a valid strategy to build a team around as strong defence or strong centres. In fact, there are teams that are stacked at other positions that learn every season (sometimes many seasons in a row) that having a guy like helle back there would probably be a good idea