member 71782
Guest
i dont really know if any of those guys would be anything other then more will sirman types, probably could play but would be moved out when it was time to win. if one of the 03s show up and show something id rather invest in them. the americans could probably come in and play well, but when was the last time we spend the money or was able to sign a us player? was it boka? and that was right after the draft, not a year later.
depending on the coach i actually think that this team could take a step, but there are significant questions with player usage, goaltending and guys like staios and henault stepping up. personally id keep corcoran, but much like boka he needs to be use effectively, not run into the ground, kid hasnt had a chance to thrive based on how much the play him.
piroinen/medina
staios/corcoran
import/ladd
robinson/henault
jodin
cuylle/fouty/afan
douglas/angle/purboo
d'amico/playfair/mcdonald
zito/johnston/?
?
you can always find good players after training camp to fill depth roles from other teams, get one or two of them on the cheep to fill out the roster
the bad thing is there doesnt really seem to be much depth in the prospet pool, no room for error with guys like johnston/zito, no room for error on the import pick.
Don't disagree, was just basing things on Windsor looking to do things as cheap as possible. I certainly would rather see most/all the OAs and a couple of others moved but if it turns out they're not willing to invest more then the minimum in the on ice product, both financially and asset wise then what I posted could be the direction they go.
I would like to see some youth from within but as you pointed, they haven't had much luck with US born players. Is it based on financials? Not willing to spend or is there more to it? I have no idea personally but getting just a couple of those players to report could turn their fortunes around pretty quickly.
Lots of good young talent in the prospect pool and on the roster, just hoping the new structure in place will focus as much on the product as they likely will on potential financial returns.