Boka for a 5th rd pick? I'm glad your not the GM. A 2nd for sure or maybe a a 3rd and a 4th. Dentist's son was a 5th round pick, I think Boka is better than him!!!
It was humor - lighten up.A 2nd for Boka!!!! Damn u better sign WR right now if he gets that. 4-5 is my guess. He has 1 year left OA at that. A 4th and the new team eats his education pkg would fit what the team is doing. You can’t use that idiotic 5th pick as comparison, in jest or not! Frasca is interesting. I’d suspect you may pull a 3rd for him. Heard today Spits aren’t looking to give Affy a no trade clause. That could be interesting.
Heard today Spits aren’t looking to give Affy a no trade clause. That could be interesting.
Taking a shot at a kid who played harder than any other ! Dropped in front of more pucks than any other ! Gave more of a shite than any other and the best you can do is the above ? Do the world a favour and STFUI am sure Boka would think he is worth at least a first round pick.
I am sure Boka would think he is worth at least a first round pick.
Taking a shot at a kid who played harder than any other ! Dropped in front of more pucks than any other ! Gave more of a ****e than any other and the best you can do is the above ? Do the world a favour and ****
Wonder what the price tag is for Douglas & Corcoran? Can see the team keeping them past the deadline.
Douglas was going to be shipped but his nhl team wanted him here. Not sure why but that is what’s happening there. Outsider mind your own. As u quoted me I said even in jest... imho team will need Corcoran, the D is brutal as is, losing him would be brutal.
They would lose more often without him. At least the way I look at it. If you trade him now (suspect he has a NTC) what’s the return. IMHO you need D-men now. Your potential signees are all forwards unless they can get a us flyer to show or Maybe a import that plays D. I’d jump at the chance to trade any /all our O/A for an o/a DCorcoran can go. He's not a bad player but if they can lose with him they can lose without him. He isn't a necessity at this point.
I can see any 1 of the group you mentioned moved. What I would not do is move all of them. For me it is either Purboo or Boka but not both. You need someone around with experience. You could bring someone in but why switch an apple for an apple? I'm sure moves will happen, they always do, but I hope this year moves made make sense.There should be lots of moves between now and the deadline.
All the OAs should be moveable pieces. The problem is if they are simply going to replace them with another OA with slightly higher skill sets at a higher cost there's no reason to move them other than requesting a trade or becoming an issue in the room.
Moving Stevenson makes sense but is it worth moving him for a 6th or 7th only to move a 4th to acquire another OA D to fill a spot on the 3rd pairing? Probably not, especially if this organization is going to look for value moves and ;likely stockpile assets.
Corcoran is likely the most valuable 19 year old on the team at this point in time. Last year, his third year of eligibility and only D in his third year he was the top D, by default. If Windsor can get a solid return for him they have three more D entering their third year of eligibility who should all be able to step up and take on his minutes. There is no reason to keep him again, especially if acquiring assets, looking for value and developing the younger players is the focus.
The D should be Staois, Ladd, Henault, Robinson, Stevenson (if they aren't looking to waste assets) Jodoin and another D from within the system. If these latest structural changes bring "stability" then they should be able to convince another D from within the system, an 02 preferably to report which would give them seven. Take the assets from moving Corcoran and stockpile for next year and beyond. If I'm not mistaken the draft board next year still has quite a few holes to fill.
Same with Douglas unless as was pointed out Dallas is putting pressure on Windsor to keep him. I can see starting the year with both of them but they should both be available come the deadline.
With Piiroinen and Medina, provided Piiroinen returns there is no reason not to move Incze sooner rather then later unless someone looks like they will be desperate for an OA goaltender heading into training camp. In that case hold onto him until August then move him. He's not a star but on a rebuilding team with a young goaltender to split time with he would do the trick.
Boka can be moved. He is replaceable and if Letowski is remaining that crutch needs to be removed. Boka has a very specific skill set that has value, albeit somewhat limited and while he took a lot of heat last year from the fans most of that should be directed at the coaching staff moreso then at Boka. The sooner he is moved the better unless the plan is to play him strictly on the 4th line and PK.
Purboo as well should be moved. I could see waiting until the deadline to move him to see if he can get off to a good start and bring up his value a bit but at the same time the sooner the better may be the way to go just in case he starts slow. Any time he remains here for he should not be playing higher then the 3rd line, some PK and if there are no other options some PP time as well but that should be kept to the second unit.
Garagan… It is what it is. I doubt he returns anything of value and will likely be waived. Brought in as a warm body and that is what his OA year will be if he plays anywhere in the league this year.
That's six or seven players, depending on Stevenson who should be moved by the deadline. There would be some value coming back but not as much as one would hope from that number of players being moved.
Anyone coming in needs to come from within the system and that may be a tough one if being frugal is a priority or they need to be FAs. Unless there is a solid deal with good pieces going both ways to be made any trades for players may be few and far between. The decisions may all come down to the financials involved. Is it cheaper to bring in a player through trade or are the assets better served kept in house and the education packages put out for signing a player already within the organization?
There should be lots of moves between now and the deadline.
All the OAs should be moveable pieces. The problem is if they are simply going to replace them with another OA with slightly higher skill sets at a higher cost there's no reason to move them other than requesting a trade or becoming an issue in the room.
Moving Stevenson makes sense but is it worth moving him for a 6th or 7th only to move a 4th to acquire another OA D to fill a spot on the 3rd pairing? Probably not, especially if this organization is going to look for value moves and ;likely stockpile assets.
Corcoran is likely the most valuable 19 year old on the team at this point in time. Last year, his third year of eligibility and only D in his third year he was the top D, by default. If Windsor can get a solid return for him they have three more D entering their third year of eligibility who should all be able to step up and take on his minutes. There is no reason to keep him again, especially if acquiring assets, looking for value and developing the younger players is the focus.
The D should be Staois, Ladd, Henault, Robinson, Stevenson (if they aren't looking to waste assets) Jodoin and another D from within the system. If these latest structural changes bring "stability" then they should be able to convince another D from within the system, an 02 preferably to report which would give them seven. Take the assets from moving Corcoran and stockpile for next year and beyond. If I'm not mistaken the draft board next year still has quite a few holes to fill.
Same with Douglas unless as was pointed out Dallas is putting pressure on Windsor to keep him. I can see starting the year with both of them but they should both be available come the deadline.
With Piiroinen and Medina, provided Piiroinen returns there is no reason not to move Incze sooner rather then later unless someone looks like they will be desperate for an OA goaltender heading into training camp. In that case hold onto him until August then move him. He's not a star but on a rebuilding team with a young goaltender to split time with he would do the trick.
Boka can be moved. He is replaceable and if Letowski is remaining that crutch needs to be removed. Boka has a very specific skill set that has value, albeit somewhat limited and while he took a lot of heat last year from the fans most of that should be directed at the coaching staff moreso then at Boka. The sooner he is moved the better unless the plan is to play him strictly on the 4th line and PK.
Purboo as well should be moved. I could see waiting until the deadline to move him to see if he can get off to a good start and bring up his value a bit but at the same time the sooner the better may be the way to go just in case he starts slow. Any time he remains here for he should not be playing higher then the 3rd line, some PK and if there are no other options some PP time as well but that should be kept to the second unit.
Garagan… It is what it is. I doubt he returns anything of value and will likely be waived. Brought in as a warm body and that is what his OA year will be if he plays anywhere in the league this year.
That's six or seven players, depending on Stevenson who should be moved by the deadline. There would be some value coming back but not as much as one would hope from that number of players being moved.
Anyone coming in needs to come from within the system and that may be a tough one if being frugal is a priority or they need to be FAs. Unless there is a solid deal with good pieces going both ways to be made any trades for players may be few and far between. The decisions may all come down to the financials involved. Is it cheaper to bring in a player through trade or are the assets better served kept in house and the education packages put out for signing a player already within the organization?
I can see any 1 of the group you mentioned moved. What I would not do is move all of them. For me it is either Purboo or Boka but not both. You need someone around with experience. You could bring someone in but why switch an apple for an apple? I'm sure moves will happen, they always do, but I hope this year moves made make sense.
I can see any 1 of the group you mentioned moved. What I would not do is move all of them. For me it is either Purboo or Boka but not both. You need someone around with experience. You could bring someone in but why switch an apple for an apple? I'm sure moves will happen, they always do, but I hope this year moves made make sense.
Very well thought out post.
** wishing and hopin’...wouldn’t it be great I’f a couple of D-MEN (U.S. Flyers) decided to come to the Spits. It would make life much easier for WR or his replacement...
Speculation last season were players like the following would all be pushing for spots/potentially willing to report.
F Austin Brimmer (01), F Christian Stevens (02), F Tanner Kelly (02), F Cade Lemmer (02), F Johnny Ulicny (02)
D Dominick Fensore (01), D Spencer Evans (02), D Owen Shier (02)
G Daniel Botelho (02)
All seems to have gone quiet on the prospects front. I know a lot of that surrounds Legend not posting anymore but I’m sure (hopeful) someone else would have some tidbits concerning some of these players. This doesn’t even include the real flyers for the most part that the Spits have drafted over the last couple of years.
My point is though that a couple of these players showing up would make the OAs and some of the 2000 born players even more expendable.