Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
Looking at it from an outsiders perspective I find the organizational tone re: Nylander to be a little inconsistent over the past two weeks. Very protective of the player for the Covid incident, vague on information cone of silence. Then very harsh on a vague late for a meeting stance and extremely public. From a philosophical POV which is it, deal with things in house behind closed doors and present solidarity or is it run through the media in a showy way?
If you’re going to be a disciplinarian be a disciplinarian. If you’re going to keep the door closed keep the door closed.
Though seems more likely they didn't view the covid contact situation as being fault of the player (ie non intentioned accident) while being late to a meeting is more directly on him. Would explain the difference in tone fairly simply