The Grim Reaper
Registered User
I don't know why posters feel it necessary to punch down on Ovechkin to lift Crosby, or vice versa.
well i'm just reminding the one guy who was on about .05 goals per game"i dont really have any agenda to troll about ovechkin" ... "im just reminding the people every month on the dot"
The hero I didnt know I needed
Ovechkin adjusted, Ovechkin is higher.Funny that Crosby has a higher shooting % all time though eh?
14.6 is higher than 12.8 right?
There is one guy who goes around looking for ways to shit on Crosby. It creates a lot of backlash.I don't know why posters feel it necessary to punch down on Ovechkin to lift Crosby, or vice versa.
Lets be honest though, MJ is to Crosby what Wetcoast is to Ovechkin. The main difference is MJ is usually reactive to other posters whereas WC has been in this thread consistently putting down and shitting on Ovechkin.There is one guy who goes around looking for ways to shit on Crosby. It creates a lot of backlash.
Not in the last 5 pages (he’s actually been quite good) but the first 50, different story.I didn't think wetcoast was shitting on Ovechkin. I thought he was giving a fair opinion, even if I or you don't agree with it. Top 10-15 all time is not an absurd take for Ovechkin, imo. Not that I have a ranking.
This is the shit I’m talking about lol.Ovechkin is gonna have a healthy season below 20 goals. Already has multiple healthy seasons with points in the 60s. Both these things have not happened with Crosby in 19 years. 19 straight years over a ppg is actually insane to think about and might just become the hardest concrete record ever to beat
This has turned into a crosby vs ovechkin thread literally what the last 3 pages are. I'm staying in topicNot in the last 5 pages (he’s actually been quite good) but the first 50, different story.
This is the shit I’m talking about lol.
Completely irrelevant to any discussion being made, with the sole purpose to shit on Ovi and suck off Crosby solely because of either (or both), your insecurities about Crosby, or your hate for Ovi.
And you know very well that what Ovechkin does at 38 years old has nothing to do with where he stands in an all-time sense.This has turned into a crosby vs ovechkin thread literally what the last 3 pages are. I'm staying in topic
One player consistently falls under a ppg all starting at the age of 26. While the other has been Over a ppg every season for 19 straight years. Idk how much more logical it can get.And you know very well that what Ovechkin does at 38 years old has nothing to do with where he stands in an all-time sense.
Even if it was on topic, you made 0 logical arguments for why Crosby > Ovi.
You literally only wanted to throw Ovi down a peg and then brag about a stat. Get out of here with your reasoning lol.
A lot of smart hockey folk place OV in the 5-7 range as well as Crosby. Sounds like you are biased in who you think smart hockey people are I suppose. As we all are biased, as the poster you quoted pointed out.I have larger concerns when people make rankings that are based on ignorance as it relates to the grand scheme of hockey history and this main board often shows a complete lack of awareness when it comes to anything prior to the current/ or maybe DPE.
Biases are only biases if you allow them to be. Data and the eye test are my weapons of choice and considering we're talking about an active player, both are more readily available than players of past eras. Biases are not taking volume and efficiency into account in any goal scoring discussion. Biases are taking any raw number and thinking it is the end of the story/debate.
Ranking Oveckhin 10th to 15th all time is certainly reasonable and where a lot of really smart hockey folks put him. And that ranking probably ends up closer to 10 or even above that when his career is completed.
Bias would be allowing my fandom of Pittsburgh cloud where I place Ovechkin in an all time light. I'm not doing that. Just like I'm not ready to place Crosby at 5, as many casual observers do. He's somewhere in the 7 to 10 range for me, higher than Ovechkin simply because his body of work is more impressive beyond the regular season and NHL, by quite a lot and most won't debate that point.
I'd also wager this forum spends too much time watching the wrong people but that may be a biased statement.
One player misses games if he’s not 100% .. the other doesn’t miss games unless he’s 0%One player consistently falls under a ppg all starting at the age of 26. While the other has been Over a ppg every season for 19 straight years. Idk how much more logical it can get.
I hereby propose Godwin's Law, HFBoards version:If I had anyone here guess the subject of this thread, none of you would get it even if I gave you each ten tries.
Suck it up buttercup.This is the shit I’m talking about lol.
Completely irrelevant to any discussion being made, with the sole purpose to shit on Ovi and suck off Crosby solely because of either (or both), your insecurities about Crosby, or your hate for Ovi.
you can only talk about if someone will hit 20 goals or not so much lolIs there a pinned thread somewhere where all of you can go CJ about Crosby vs Ovechkin for the rest of time, while the rest of us stay on topic and CJ about whether Ovechkin is cooked or not?
Just checked, 6 points in his last 5 games, 1G 5A. He's still contributing, that team just stinks though.
I mean, he's the greatest goalscorer ever at this point, even if he doesn't pass Gretzky.According to Ovechkin enthusiasts he's already passed Gretzky no need for 8 to keep playing.
How does a team stink being only 6 points out of 2nd place in the division while having 2 games in hand? Do you mean 75% of all teams in the eastern conference stink, and if so why?