HolyHagelin
Speed? I am speed.
- Jan 8, 2024
- 864
- 1,278
“This player’s contributions are overrated due to this reason. Also i am not downgrading said player for said reason.”
Ok.
Ok.
Sure but context is different than this“This player’s contributions are overrated due to this reason. Also i am not downgrading said player for said reason.”
Ok.
How can you slag on a guy for generating shot volume, when there is literally a long-running and frequently used offensive philosophy in the NHL (funnel) that is all about generating shot volume and capitalizing (pun intended) on opportunities presented thereby?
Leading the league in shots time and time again is ABSOLUTELY a mark in OV’s favor and spinning it otherwise just tells everyone reading that you really don’t know what you’re talking about. “There is no such thing as a bad shot on goal.”
FTR - I am a Rangers fan, no skin in the OV conversation.
ETA - if we regard SOG as a negative, then the entire premise of modern analytics is wrong, and corsi and fenwick need to be burned down.
LIndros was tougher than OvechkinThe whole “Russian machine never breaks” moniker became a thing because his durability is exceedingly rare… especially with the type of game he plays/played.
In his prime he was this generation’s Eric Lindros; the player plowing over others at full speed.
The difference is Lindros was strong but not tough. Ovechkin is strong and tough.
It’s one of the things that sets him apart from contemporaries like Crosby and Malkin. You can’t help your team when you’re sitting out.
LIndros was tougher than Ovechkin
Better fighter and harder hitter
He played with his head down to mucj though in an era where head shots were legal
He got injured b/c og the era he was in and b/c he tried to play like a bullLindros was the antithesis of toughness. Toughness is the ability to take punishment and not let it affect you.
His career was overflowing with injuries of every kind, even before his concussion problems. He played over 70 games only 4 years his entire career. Lindros was strong as an ox, but more brittle than a light bulb.
Some people are also more susceptible to concussions than others for unknown reasons…or perhaps known but just not to meLIndros was tougher than Ovechkin
Better fighter and harder hitter
He played with his head down to mucj though in an era where head shots were legal
He got injured b/c og the era he was in and b/c he tried to play like a bull
Cam Neely is another PWF/physically gifted dude of that era who got injured despite being tough
This is falseIndeed Bossy was the 2nd or 3rd best player on his team, sometimes first though.
Nobody ever would have mistook Ovechkin for anything other than the best player on his team, even if he was playing with Bryan Trottier. At his best, Ovechkin was quite obviously the best player in the NHL over your boy Crosby - who was superior to Trottier.
So again, your desire to dishonestly denigrate Ovechkin by pretending he's on Bossy's level is blatant. The two of them are not close.
This is false
You are in denial then.
Ovechkin's 2008 season is far superior to any season Sidney Crosby has ever had.
I'd take Golden boy over 2008 Ovechkin if I had to pick one for the duration a playoff to try and win the cup. And this is all that matters.You are in denial then.
Ovechkin's 2008 season is far superior to any season Sidney Crosby has ever had.
I got Crosby over Ovechkin for their careers but Ovechkin clearly has the better peak of the two. Ovechkin from 2008-2010 won 3 straight Ted Lindsay's.This is false
I'd take Golden boy over 2008 Ovechkin if I had to pick one for the duration a playoff to try and win the cup. And this is all that matters.
And 84 assists for Crosby's 2007 season is as impressive has 65 goals.
Isn't this thread about whether OV will score 20 goals this year or not?I would take 2008-2010 Ovechkin over any version of Crosby to win a cup. He was better than Crosby in the regular season and in the playoffs.
That wasn't even the most assists by a player that season. Thornton had 92.
Ovechkin's goal total is the highest raw and adjusted total since the lockout despite scoring being down in 2008 relative to 2007, 2006, and these past few seasons.
Great question... most participants seem to have lost that point about 55 pages ago lolIsn't this thread about whether OV will score 20 goals this year or not?
When both of these guys retire, I'll participate in the discussion or even ask the question, who ranks higher on the all-time list, but until then, will defer because they both still have games to play.
If I had anyone here guess the subject of this thread, none of you would get it even if I gave you each ten tries.
Isn't this thread about whether OV will score 20 goals this year or not?
I would take 2008-2010 Ovechkin over any version of Crosby to win a cup. He was better than Crosby in the regular season and in the playoffs.
That wasn't even the most assists by a player that season. Thornton had 92.
Ovechkin's goal total is the highest raw and adjusted total since the lockout despite scoring being down in 2008 relative to 2007, 2006, and these past few seasons.
And this is why Crosby has 3 and Ovechkin has 1 .......
Wrong.Indeed Bossy was the 2nd or 3rd best player on his team, sometimes first though.
Nobody ever would have mistook Ovechkin for anything other than the best player on his team, even if he was playing with Bryan Trottier. At his best, Ovechkin was quite obviously the best player in the NHL over your boy Crosby - who was superior to Trottier.
So again, your desire to dishonestly denigrate Ovechkin by pretending he's on Bossy's level is blatant. The two of them are not close.
Wrong.
no one agrees, you will never hear anyone around the game try to claim this, especially in 10-20 years. it will always be boring copeYou are in denial then.
Ovechkin's 2008 season is far superior to any season Sidney Crosby has ever had.
Ovechkin's teams generally finished higher in the regular season than the Penguins. If he is so almighty why couldn't he get them past the second round more than once?Malkin - the clear cut 3rd best player of the generation and likely a top 25-35 player of all time - is the obvious difference here.
Where does Backstrom rank? The history forum doesn't even have him as top 200 all time.
no one agrees, you will never hear anyone around the game try to claim this, especially in 10-20 years. it will always be boring cope
Ovechkin's teams generally finished higher in the regular season than the Penguins. If he is so almighty why couldn't he get them past the second round more than once?