Fordy
Registered User
- May 28, 2008
- 26,939
- 3,201
at the end of the day no one ever has to debate ovechkin's defensive acumen because everyone knows it's 0
Nick Backstrom might be a top 200 player of all time.
Malkin might be top 30.
He's quite durable because outside of the hits HE initiates he rarely gets hit or physical because his teammates are the ones doing the heavy lifting along the boards. Durability also doesn't mean he trains a ton in the offseason. Are you saying that Phil Kessel is the best offseason training athlete in NHL history? He holds the consecutive games streak which shows how durable he is.
no he wasn'tHockey players are far less likely to have good longevity if their conditioning is poor.
Ovechkin, at age 36, was superior or equal to Sidney Crosby at age 36.
You don't have a point.
Malkin being brought up as some sort of knock against Sid has alwways made me chuckle. The amount of time they've spent to together at ES is insanely small.
exactly when do you think teams have put their toughest defensive matchups against malkin instead of crosby? must be a long list, so get startedNo it isn't. And that's not the only way players benefit from each other anyway.
Penguins fans have gone on and on for 15+ years about that one time an opposing team focused their best defensive player on Crosby in the 2009 finals. Ovechkin's entire career has been that way. He was never splitting the toughest match-ups with anyone because the Capitals never had a second line or another generational player that was anywhere near the threat Ovechkin is.
No it isn't. And that's not the only way players benefit from each other anyway.
Penguins fans have gone on and on for 15+ years about that one time an opposing team focused their best defensive player on Crosby in the 2009 finals. Ovechkin's entire career has been that way. He was never splitting the toughest match-ups with anyone because the Capitals never had a second line or another generational player that was anywhere near the threat Ovechkin is.
Of the top 20 players of all time, Ovechkin has the weakest second best player on the team.
Malkin is also very injury prone.Nick Backstrom might be a top 200 player of all time.
Malkin might be top 30.
no he wasn't
wrong. i'm so glad i don't have to hang my hat on .05s of a goal to know who is better. you can get a solid gold .05 gpg and hang it over your mantle, pray to it every night, while the rest of us can rest easy knowing who is betterCrosby is currently 24th in points and 8th in goals. On pace for 49 goals and 88 points if he plays all 82 games. Crosby has a PPG of 1.08 and a GPG of .60.
Ovechkin had 50 goals and 90 points in 77 games player. He was 16th in points and 4th in goals. Had a PPG of 1.17 and a GPG of .65.
So yes, Ovechkin was better at age 36 than Crosby has been pacing this season.
Ovechkin has had stacked/deep teams.
Mike Green in his prime
Alex Semin in his prime
Kuznetsov, Oshie, Wilson,
Carlson in his prime
Holtby in his prime
Its not like the Caps didnt ubderperform until 2018.
Pens had great teams at times but so did caps.
Because he's misrepresenting the data. Low defensive zone starts and no pk does not mean he's bad defensively. It means the penguins value his offensive game more than his defensive game. His two hundred foot game is still excellent, hence the praise from around the league.Why does Sid continue winning this? I mean we're well past a decade of Sid leading this category. I guess players are just simps and racists against Far east Euro's?
Why do players and so many analysts say this if it's a load of rubbish?
@Midnight Judges
wrong. i'm so glad i don't have to hang my hat on .05s of a goal to know who is better. you can get a solid gold .05 gpg and hang it over your mantle, pray to it every night, while the rest of us can rest easy knowing who is better
in 10 years, 20, 50, everyone will be talking about crosby as the best player of his generation. you'll be talking about .05 goals per game. i'm sorry but that's the truth. truth hurts!It's not uncommon for people to continue believing things after being thoroughly disproven.
Because he's misrepresenting the data. Low defensive zone starts and no pk does not mean he's bad defensively. It means the penguins value his offensive game more than his defensive game.
except he is and will continue to get it. so you're wrong. just get over itThat's true, and I agree. It merely means Crosby doesn't deserve Selke consideration because he isn't contributing as much defensively as the real defensive players on the Penguins.
The on-ice goals against, however, does show that Sidney Crosby is the 4th WORST regular player on the Penguins in terms of preventing goals against at 5v5. So in addition to those other stats, it definitively shows that any mention of Sidney Crosby and "Selke" together is a farce.
in 10 years, 20, 50, everyone will be talking about crosby as the best player of his generation. you'll be talking about .05 goals per game. i'm sorry but that's the truth. truth hurts!
no they won't. they don't even talk about it now. it's you against the worldPeople will be talking about Ovechkin having more MVPs and a whopping 50% more goals in the same number of seasons.
False. Conditioning is one thing but players who actually battle along the boards, in front of the net etc are more likely to get injured than a guy who floats in the open space between the dots while his teammates do all the heavy lifting.Hockey players are far less likely to have good longevity if their conditioning is poor.
Ovechkin, at age 36, was superior or equal to Sidney Crosby at age 36.
You don't have a point.
Pens stacked team has 2 hall of famers on it too..."Stacked" team has 1 hall of famer, maybe 2 if Backstrom makes it.
Your post is gibberish.
Better than it used to be, which was a straight up liability that hung around the red line and never back checked. Luckily that mostly stopped after his peak ended.at the end of the day no one ever has to debate ovechkin's defensive acumen because everyone knows it's 0
I wouldn't call Backstrom weak by any stretch. I'd also probably nitpick "top 20 players of all time" because simply saying 'players' brings in a few goalies (which makes "second best player" compared to a forward weird) and a few defensemen (which also makes it weird). Maybe we should be talking 'top 20 forward' or 'top 20 goal-scorers' but that's a discussion way beyond what I was going to comment about.Of the top 20 players of all time, Ovechkin has the weakest second best player on the team.