Barkov was better than McDavid in 4 games out of 7. Speaking of "mental gymnastics"...
By what measure?
Barkov was better than McDavid in 4 games out of 7. Speaking of "mental gymnastics"...
He was certainly expected to be out there receiving the Smythe LIKE EVERY OTHER PLAYER BEFORE HIM!Because it's an awards show and he's expected to be there.
My God, the pretzels people turn themselves into to discredit him.
The Cup is the only trophy that matters and any player would turn in all awards for it.
Dude, seriously? I don't know... rewatch the games, maybe.By what measure?
And McDavid clearly understands that the Cup is tied to his legacy. No Cup = no true greatness. He can golf with the true Cup winner greats but it will be empty to him. That’s the key here. McDavid knows.See this is my point. If he went out there it wouldn't have changed anything. In the grand scheme of things, all trophies except the Cup are meaningless.
Something about jumping off bridges. If he accepted it he would've been accused of only caring about individual awards.He was certainly expected to be out there receiving the Smythe LIKE EVERY OTHER PLAYER BEFORE HIM!
Dude, seriously? I don't know... rewatch the games, maybe.
He scored 10 out of his 11 points in three games. In the other four games he managed one point.
You think showing up in three games out of seven is playing well for an entire series?
Cope. Since when does the greatest player since Gretzky need others to produce?I'm not sure it was McDavid that didn't show up - it was his supporting cast that no-showed.
Florida game planned around McDavid - Knoblauch got out coached on this one and the supporting cast didn't show up and make Florida pay for stacking the deck against McDavids line.
Dude, seriously? I don't know... rewatch the games, maybe.
So it seems clear that it was between McDavid and Barkov for the voters, not Bobrovsky.
Edit. Jim Mathesons votes were WILD man: McDavid, Hyman and Bouchard, not a single player from the Stanley Cup winning team.
Cope
Did anybody accuse Giguere or Leach of that?Something about jumping off bridges. If he accepted it he would've been accused of only caring about individual awards.
Last I checked, Draisatl wasn't in the conversation for Conn Smythe since Round 3 began. I am curious though if he would snub it like McD did.Still don't understand why everyone is focusing on McDavid and not Draisaitl. Draisaitl was a no show in the finals. He should be getting the heat, not McDavid.
No, but those players aren't regularly accused of only caring about individual awards like McDavid is. Either he does or he doesn't. He decided that he didn't care about an individual award and suddenly he's a bum for it.Did anybody accuse Giguere or Leach if that?
Last I checked, Draisatl wasn't in the conversation for Conn Smythe since Round 3 began. I am curious though if he would snub it like McD did.
Like changing the subject and not staying on topic?Ok?
You pushing back against McDavid winning the CST has all been one big Cope.
Highly doubt that. McDavid would have looked completely miserable, just like JSG did when he won the Smythe.Something about jumping off bridges. If he accepted it he would've been accused of only caring about individual awards.
Like changing the subject and not staying on topic?
But I'll direct this toward you now: Do you think not showing up in four games out of seven is playing well overall?
Why won't you answer my question? It's a simple yes or no answer.Are you somehow under the impression that the CST is only about the finals?
Because over the course of the entire playoff's McDavid showed up in ways that Barkov simply isn't skilled enough to do.
The problem is you're discrediting the Panthers by saying that McDavid no-showed in 4/7 games.Why won't you answer my question? It's a simple yes or no answer.
Just more deflection.
No-showed, shut down, failed to rise to the occasion. Whatever phrase you want to use is fine by me and doesn't change the argument.The problem is you're discrediting the Panthers by saying that McDavid no-showed in 4/7 games.
But it doesn't really matter because the Conn Smythe is for the entire playoffs not one series. Also there's a distinct problem with conflating no points with "no showing".No-showed, shut down, failed to rise to the occasion. Whatever phrase you want to use is fine by me and doesn't change the argument.
Yes, it is for the whole playoffs and has been demonstrated McDavid only produced for less than half the Finals.But it doesn't really matter because the Conn Smythe is for the entire playoffs not one series. Also there's a distinct problem with conflating no points with "no showing".
Neither did the team. It's a team game.Yes, it is for the whole playoffs and has been demonstrated McDavid only produced for less than half the Finals.
You can argue semantics all you want, the fact of the matter is for the majority of the Finals McDavid didn't produce and that's his entire job. Whatever distinction you want to make for his four game disappearing doesn't change that fact.