The narrative around Ohtani’s season that gives him the assumption of “dominance” is uniqueness. Many people have stated that the 50/50 is what tilted them to Ohtani, as it’s “ ever been done before.” I continue to contest that idea. Never been done before does not equate dominance. It’s unique, it’s rare, but it doesn’t necessitate dominant. As I’ve said: Acuna became the first player in MLB history to have a 40/60 and 40/70 season just last year. How come no one considers him dominant the way they do Ohtani?
It’s not convenient to remove his pitching from his only “dominant” batting season - he hasn’t thrown a single pitch in over 13 months. It’s convenient to assume he is a top 5 pitcher AND top 5 hitter at the same time - he has never done both together. It’s not coincidence that when he is batting only (he doesn’t even play the field this season), his batting goes from good to great. However, despite being only a DH, he isn’t even the top hitting player in baseball this year (and the guy who is, has been a top-3 hitter since he came into the league). Unlike many here apparently, I am not willing to assume what can be until it has been. Babe Ruth, the greatest “two-way” player ever, gave up pitching and became the “greatest hitter ever.” It’s not coincidence that it happened to boost Ohtani as well. But even in that context, Ohtani was never a dominant pitcher. A single 4th place finish in Cy Young confirms this.
What Ohtani is is unique, and uniquely great at hitting and pitching. But he isn’t the best, or even close to “dominant” when compared to his peers in either (when he was doing both), nor individually (when he is only a DH, as shown this year). Dominant is beating the entire field by 10%+ like Mahomes and McDavid do in nearly every statistical category.