LOFIN
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2011
- 17,269
- 24,781
On the bright side of Messier, if we fire him a couple years later, one would think he’d finally stop coming up in conversation for HC.
If only Torts was available.
We're still putting Panarin on Dolan who had 0 idea who he was until he signed here.
That was ALL JG/JD. Fits their MO.
Patrick Roy HC
Mark Messier Offense
Steve Valiquette Defense
Henrik Lundqvist Assistant GM
Except when Dolan hired Drury he explicitly said that he expects his team to pursue high profile UFA's when they become available. That's how he runs his business.
Panarin signed here when Drury was GM?
2nd time today I heard that Dubas to Pittsburgh rumor. I think Marek or Friedman mentioned it on their podcast.
Hockey has been basically the same since the beginning. Ive been a fan since the mid 60’s. While a lot has changed with analytics and so forth the common denominator to winning in the playoffs is you need players that are willing to go into the corners, player’s that are willing to take a beating in front of the net and basically players that are willing to give up a kidney to win. This team has very few of those playersHere's the thing about Leach. I think he's a legit candidate and all. I think he could be a great coach. The only thing I would caution is this. Gallant was lauded for doing a very similar thing with the Knights in their first year. The way the Kraken play, that is the way management wants the team to play. That fast, forecheck style. Pucks go north fast. I mean that's what Quinn and Gallant have preached for 4-5 seasons now. The vet core either aren't capable or willing of playing that way. And so if we hire Leach, we better be willing or capable of changing the core.
I've said this SO many times that I'm making myself sick hearing it. Thanks for saying it!Hockey has been basically the same since the beginning. Ive been a fan since the mid 60’s. While a lot has changed with analytics and so forth the common denominator to winning in the playoffs is you need players that are willing to go into the corners, player’s that are willing to take a beating in front of the net and basically players that are willing to give up a kidney to win. This team has very few of those players
So true...analytics are for regular season imo. We have two guys who are poster boys for what you're talking about in Zib and Panarin. If those two don't have a ton of support we'll never get there because they aren't those types of player, which is why the Kane deal was dumb, and why the Copp and Vatrano deals worked for us because Panarin and Zib need guys that will do the dirty work.Hockey has been basically the same since the beginning. Ive been a fan since the mid 60’s. While a lot has changed with analytics and so forth the common denominator to winning in the playoffs is you need players that are willing to go into the corners, player’s that are willing to take a beating in front of the net and basically players that are willing to give up a kidney to win. This team has very few of those players
Not really understanding. If a coach gets fired he still needs permission to interview for another team? Or is he saying that we need Sullivans permission to become our coach, which is obvious?
A coach is under contract. When they are fired, that just means they don't show up to work anymore. They are still paid and can't work for other teams.Not really understanding. If a coach gets fired he still needs permission to interview for another team? Or is he saying that we need Sullivans permission to become our coach, which is obvious?
Understood, thank you.A coach is under contract. When they are fired, that just means they don't show up to work anymore. They are still paid and can't work for other teams.
If a team wants to get out of the contract they can give the fired coach permission to seek other opportunities. If the coach is hired, the team is released of their obligation to pay the coach.